Hi Ben,
On 11/13/2012 09:53 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Is this something that I could test, or could you send
> me a patch for one of the examples to crank them up to a big problem size?
I'll send you a patch for one of the examples to make a large RB IO file
Thanks for the info. Is this something that I could test, or could you send me
a patch for one of the examples to crank them up to a big problem size?
Also, what type of computer / filesystem are you testing this on? Straight
local disk or what?
301MB/19 = 15.8 MB/sec, so I expect there is st
On 11/12/2012 09:23 PM, David Knezevic wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 05:24 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
>> Dave, my ultimate fix for you will be extending this to write
>>
>> for node…
>> for vec…
>> for var…
>> for comp…
>>
>> or some permutation thereof, which will necessitate
On 11/06/2012 05:24 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> Dave, my ultimate fix for you will be extending this to write
>
> for node…
>for vec…
> for var…
>for comp…
>
> or some permutation thereof, which will necessitate writing all the reduced
> basis vectors to a single file,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> I just wanted to report that with libMesh HEAD our tests are currently
> running fine in both serial and parallel (both threaded and MPI and the
> combo). So, as far as I can tell, nothing has been broken on our end.
Woohoo!
Thanks for that.
So... I had a crazy week this week and I haven't given you guys feedback on
all of this.
I just wanted to report that with libMesh HEAD our tests are currently
running fine in both serial and parallel (both threaded and MPI and the
combo). So, as far as I can tell, nothing has been broken on our
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> I tested this on all my stuff and am pretty confident with it, but
> let me know if anything breaks!
We should probably coordinate commits of "stuff that works great on
all our tests but fundamentally changes core library functionality"
bet
On 11/06/2012 05:24 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> All -
>
> I'm refactoring the SystemIO code to help address the RB IO bottleneck. As
> of r6316, serialized vectors are written as
>
> for node…
>for var…
> for comp…
>
>
> instead of the previous implementation
>
> for var…
>
