On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> Deleting them would have worked, but just changing PETSC_LIB to
> SLEPC_LIB overrode the SLEPc config files' SLEPC_LIB and broke
> linking. I've fixed it.
Oops, guess I won't check in SLEPc patches without a working installation then?
BTW,
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, John Peterson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
>
>> Also, I find it strange that the Make.common.in section for SLEPc
>> computes PETSC_LIB variable. It looks more like a copy-paste error
>> from the PETSc section. Should it not be SLEPC_LI
Ah yes. That must have stemmed because of my typo earlier. Thanks for
checking.
Vijay
On Sep 1, 2011 5:11 PM, "Roy Stogner" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
>
>> And the other is related to the recent change in PETSc where the
>> *Destroy() take the address of the object
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
> And the other is related to the recent change in PETSc where the
> *Destroy() take the address of the object which has been propagated
> in SLEPc to maintain consistency.
libMesh now fails to build for me with SLEPc 3.1.0.4 - I presume that,
since
Oops. That's a typo :) slepc-3.1-p6
So include the PETSC_ARCH/include only if version is greater than 3.1.
I do see the configure script having the information but not sure how
you would propagate that into Make.common.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
>> Is this a rece
> Is this a recent change? As of slepc-3.0.0-p7 it looks like slepc
> header files are in $SLEPC_DIR/include. Also I don't think $PETSC_DIR
> is required any more as of PETSc 3.
Yes. I have a slepc-3.0.0-p6 installed and it does not require this.
The inclusion is due to "slepcconf.h" required by
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
> All,
>
> Find attached two small patches for working with the SLEPc dev version.
>
> One of them is related to adding the include directory in the
> configured architecture. And the other is related to the recent change
Is this a recent
