Dear all,
In my application, I am doing quite a lot of assignments between
NumericVector instances (which always are PetscVector instances in my
case), and since I am lazily most of the time working in opt mode, I
didn't realize that I was sometimes assigning vectors of different
type, that is
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:59:22 +0200 (CEST), Tim Kroeger
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In my application, I am doing quite a lot of assignments between
> NumericVector instances (which always are PetscVector instances in my
> case), and since I am lazily most of the time working in opt mode, I
> didn'
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:59:22 +0200 (CEST), Tim Kroeger
> wrote:
>
>> In my application, I am doing quite a lot of assignments between
>> NumericVector instances (which always are PetscVector instances in my
>> case), and since I am lazily most of the time
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:16:53 -0500 (CDT), Roy Stogner
wrote:
> I suspect there are only two reasons why we didn't support mismatched
> types:
>
> when that assertion was written we only had serial and parallel
> vectors, a more extreme mismatch
Yes, these are different in a deep way, they have
