On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Vetter Roman wrote:
>>> I've just checked in a change which will hopefully please both the
>>> people who need to call this->clear() at the end of
>>> PetscNonlinearSolver::solve and the people who want
>>> PetscNonlinearSolver::print_converged_reason() to work.
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Derek Gaston wrote:
>> What arguments do we want these to take? An EquationSystems& and
>> string as usual? I'd think a System& would be more elegant, except
>> that then when someone needed more than a bare-bones System (as
>> everyone does...) they'd have to downcast it
Agreed. I plan to implement a prototype interface next week at FEF.
-Ben
On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:16 PM, "Roy Stogner" wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
>>> What arguments do we want these to take? An EquationSystems& and
>>> string as usual? I'd think a System& would
