Re: [Libmesh-devel] libmesh and petsc-dev

2013-02-27 Thread Jed Brown
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote: > Here it is: https://github.com/libMesh/libmesh/pull/51 > I made some line comments. Did you test this with petsc-3.2 or earlier? > DMlibMeshCreateXXXDecomposition() is "broken" (produces no decompositions > at the moment), > but the API

Re: [Libmesh-devel] libmesh and petsc-dev

2013-02-27 Thread Dmitry Karpeev
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote: > >> Here it is: https://github.com/libMesh/libmesh/pull/51 >> > > I made some line comments. Did you test this with petsc-3.2 or earlier? > I tested with petsc-dev, petsc-3.3 and petsc-3

Re: [Libmesh-devel] libmesh and petsc-dev

2013-02-27 Thread Jed Brown
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote: > I made some line comments. Did you test this with petsc-3.2 or earlier? >> > I tested with petsc-dev, petsc-3.3 and petsc-3.2. > Can you explain how the preprocessor accepted this line without having PETSC_VERSION_LE defined? #if !PETSC_V

[Libmesh-devel] TBB config issue

2013-02-27 Thread Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
On Feb 27, 2013, at 7:53 AM, wrote > > I have a user trying to configure libMesh on a Linux cluster but it keeps > running into problems with TBB. He's not alone as I have also had a few > other reports of people who still receive error even after adding the > --diable-tbb flag to the config

Re: [Libmesh-devel] libmesh and petsc-dev

2013-02-27 Thread Dmitry Karpeev
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote: > >> I made some line comments. Did you test this with petsc-3.2 or earlier? >>> >> I tested with petsc-dev, petsc-3.3 and petsc-3.2. >> > > Can you explain how the preprocessor accepted t

Re: [Libmesh-devel] libmesh and petsc-dev

2013-02-27 Thread Jed Brown
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote: > Sure. petscdmlibmesh assumes !PETSC_VERSION_LESS_THAN(3,3,0) at the very > top. > Okay, I missed that. You could have used an exact match PETSC_VERSION_(3,3,0) in the conditional. --