[Libmesh-devel] sanity check: AMR & subdomain restricted variables?

2016-04-29 Thread Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
Just a sanity check question: is anyone out there successfully doing AMR in combination with subdomain restricted variables? We have a domain with T active everywhere, tightly coupled to P but only on a subset of the domain (ablation material with T,P in perfect contact to an insulator with T

Re: [Libmesh-devel] sanity check: AMR & subdomain restricted variables?

2016-04-29 Thread Paul T. Bauman
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) < benjamin.k...@nasa.gov> wrote: > Just a sanity check question: is anyone out there successfully doing AMR > in combination with subdomain restricted variables? > > We have a domain with T active everywhere, tightly coupled to P but onl

Re: [Libmesh-devel] sanity check: AMR & subdomain restricted variables?

2016-04-29 Thread Derek Gaston
We use both of those things a lot... but I can't think of an instance where we use them both together. What kind of error do you get? I could try a quick problem... Derek On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:41 PM Paul T. Bauman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) < > be

Re: [Libmesh-devel] sanity check: AMR & subdomain restricted variables?

2016-04-29 Thread Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Derek Gaston mailto:fried...@gmail.com>> wrote: What kind of error do you get? I could try a quick problem… No assertions or anything, just some crap values coming out of the first linear solve after AMR. Interestingly looks like on the interface of the subdomai