On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:12 PM, David Knezevic wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:07 PM, David Knezevic <
> david.kneze...@akselos.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Roy Stogner
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
>>>
>>> I've attached a modified versi
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:07 PM, David Knezevic
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Roy Stogner
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
>>
>> I've attached a modified version of misc_ex9 that attaches
>>> constraints on one side of the "crack" and checks if the dof
>>> c
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Roy Stogner
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
>
> I've attached a modified version of misc_ex9 that attaches
>> constraints on one side of the "crack" and checks if the dof
>> constraints are present during assembly. This passes in serial but
>>
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
> I've attached a modified version of misc_ex9 that attaches
> constraints on one side of the "crack" and checks if the dof
> constraints are present during assembly. This passes in serial but
> fails in parallel because constraints are not communicated o
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Roy Stogner
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Roy Stogner
>> wrote:
>>
>> I think the proper fix is to call the coupling functors in
>> scatter_constraints(), then query the processors who own
On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> I think the proper fix is to call the coupling functors in
> scatter_constraints(), then query the processors who own the elements
> which are to be coupled for any constraints
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:44 PM, David Knezevic
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Roy Stogner
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
>>
>> I'm using GhostingFunctor for a contact solve, in which I consider a 1/4
>>> domain with partial Dirichlet boundary conditions
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Roy Stogner
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
>
> I'm using GhostingFunctor for a contact solve, in which I consider a 1/4
>> domain with partial Dirichlet boundary conditions that impose a symmetry
>> condition (i.e. displacement normal to th
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
> I'm using GhostingFunctor for a contact solve, in which I consider a 1/4
> domain with partial Dirichlet boundary conditions that impose a symmetry
> condition (i.e. displacement normal to the symmetry boundary is clamped to
> zero, and tangential di