>> Is there any reason why the AutoPtr class does not have a copy
>> constructor? I would like to create an stl vector of AutoPtr
>>
>> vector< AutoPtr > > local_solution_history;
>>
>> to store the entire solution history.
>
> Unfortunately you can never ever have a container of AutoPtrs. Yo
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:38 PM, David Fuentes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Is there any reason why the AutoPtr class does not have a copy
> constructor? I would like to create an stl vector of AutoPtr
>
> vector< AutoPtr > > local_solution_history;
>
> to store the entire solution history.
Is there any reason why the AutoPtr class does not have a copy
constructor? I would like to create an stl vector of AutoPtr
vector< AutoPtr > > local_solution_history;
to store the entire solution history.
thanks,
df
--
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Roy Stogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, and this is a completely irrelevant remark that may lower the IQ
> of anyone who reads it: Doesn't the singular noun with misconjugated
> verb, "LIBMESH_HAVE_", make our config code now sound just a little
> like it wa
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Benjamin Kirk wrote:
> I am about to check in a substantial change set that prefixes every variable
> in include/base/libmesh_config.h with LIBMESH_ to avoid conflicts with
> external packages.
I'm copying this to libmesh-users to make sure everyone sees it. As I
just disco
Roy, John,
Thank you very much,
df
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, David Fuentes wrote:
>
>> System is defined as a derived class of a template class
>> ReferenceCountedObject ?
>>
>> I've never seen this before. Are both "System" referring
>> to the sa
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, David Fuentes wrote:
> System is defined as a derived class of a template class
> ReferenceCountedObject ?
>
> I've never seen this before. Are both "System" referring
> to the same class? Is the System in the template the
> same as the System in the class definition?
Yes.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:45 AM, John Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:42 AM, David Fuentes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
>> I've never seen this before. Are both "System" referring
>> to the same class? Is the System in the template the
>> same as the System in th
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:42 AM, David Fuentes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've never seen this before. Are both "System" referring
> to the same class? Is the System in the template the
> same as the System in the class definition?
Yeah, it's the same system. If you take a look at the templ
In the system class definition
$LIBMESH_DIR/include/solvers/system.h
//
// System class definition
class System : public ReferenceCountedObject
{
protected:
.
.
.
System is defined as a derived class of a template class
Refer
10 matches
Mail list logo
