Re: [Libmesh-users] [libmesh-users] quick question about parallel

2012-08-17 Thread David Knezevic
K, Just run the code with mpiexec -np 8 (or whatever) as Roy suggested. The "greedy algorithm" is sequential, but the finite element solves are parallel and so is the "sampling" at each greedy iteration. (The training set is divided up among the processors.) David On 08/16/2012 10:04 PM, Ky

Re: [Libmesh-users] [libmesh-users] quick question about parallel

2012-08-16 Thread Kyunghoon Lee
Dear Roy, Thank you for explaining the necessary steps. I'm not quite sure reduced basis training can work in parallel since it is more like a sequential process. I'll ask to David to get a better understanding. Regards, K. Lee. On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > On Fri,

Re: [Libmesh-users] [libmesh-users] quick question about parallel

2012-08-16 Thread Roy Stogner
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Kyunghoon Lee wrote: > I noticed that my workstation uses only one core for reduced basis training > despite having eight cores, so I guess I may use more CPU power by > utilizing parallel. I checked two examples, introduction_ex4.C and > transient_ex1.C, to see if how it wo

[Libmesh-users] [libmesh-users] quick question about parallel

2012-08-16 Thread Kyunghoon Lee
Hi all, I noticed that my workstation uses only one core for reduced basis training despite having eight cores, so I guess I may use more CPU power by utilizing parallel. I checked two examples, introduction_ex4.C and transient_ex1.C, to see if how it works, but I couldn't tell which part of code