On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:07 PM, David Knezevic
wrote:
I'm assembling a non-local term (specifically
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Roy Stogner
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:07 PM, David Knezevic <
>> david.kneze...@akselos.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm assembling a non-local term (specifically some LHS values on either
>>> side of a contact in
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, David Knezevic wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:07 PM, David Knezevic
> wrote:
>
>> I'm assembling a non-local term (specifically some LHS values on either
>> side of a contact interface). Let's consider a simple case: node A on proc
>> 0 is on one side of the interface, a
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:18 PM, David Knezevic
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:07 PM, David Knezevic <
> david.kneze...@akselos.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm assembling a non-local term (specifically some LHS values on either
>> side of a contact interface). Let's consider a simple case: node A on pro
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:07 PM, David Knezevic
wrote:
> I'm assembling a non-local term (specifically some LHS values on either
> side of a contact interface). Let's consider a simple case: node A on proc
> 0 is on one side of the interface, and node B on proc 1 is on the other
> side. Suppose t
I'm assembling a non-local term (specifically some LHS values on either
side of a contact interface). Let's consider a simple case: node A on proc
0 is on one side of the interface, and node B on proc 1 is on the other
side. Suppose that node A has a dof_constraint_row associated with it
(stored on
