>> Is there any reason why the AutoPtr class does not have a copy
>> constructor? I would like to create an stl vector of AutoPtr
>>
>> vector< AutoPtr > > local_solution_history;
>>
>> to store the entire solution history.
>
> Unfortunately you can never ever have a container of AutoPtrs. Yo
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:38 PM, David Fuentes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Is there any reason why the AutoPtr class does not have a copy
> constructor? I would like to create an stl vector of AutoPtr
>
> vector< AutoPtr > > local_solution_history;
>
> to store the entire solution history.
Is there any reason why the AutoPtr class does not have a copy
constructor? I would like to create an stl vector of AutoPtr
vector< AutoPtr > > local_solution_history;
to store the entire solution history.
thanks,
df
--