Thanks for the infos.
I guess that the savings I was reporting were also due to the DofObjects
refactoring.
Do you store one DofObject per VariableGroup?
I guess in my usage pattern one DofObject per element would be the most
efficient strategy.
Would it be hard to do such a thing?
I think that to
On May 28, 2013, at 11:22 AM, lorenzo alessio botti
wrote:
> Yes you are right, it would be limited to dG, all variables of the same
> polynomial degree and no local P refinement.
> I know that this is very specific but the memory savings are quite
> encouraging.
To properly test for this cas
Yes you are right, it would be limited to dG, all variables of the same
polynomial degree and no local P refinement.
I know that this is very specific but the memory savings are quite
encouraging.
Lorenzo
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
[email protected]> w
On May 28, 2013, at 7:55 AM, lorenzo alessio botti
wrote:
> I've checked out the master branch to try the blocked implementation and it
> works great.
> The memory goes down to 1.2GB from 1.7GB, in Gnuid I have a system with a
> VariableGroup of size 3 and a system with just one variable.
Exce
Hi all,
I've checked out the master branch to try the blocked implementation and it
works great.
The memory goes down to 1.2GB from 1.7GB, in Gnuid I have a system with a
VariableGroup of size 3 and a system with just one variable.
I have a remark regarding the blocked implementation in the dG fra
