On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:00 PM, John Peterson wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Karen Lee wrote:
> >
> >> Distinct, yes, but have you checked whether it is inverted? Assuming
> >> this is a tet, it will be inverted (and thus have negative jacobians)
> >> if you take one of the vertices a
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Karen Lee wrote:
>
>> Distinct, yes, but have you checked whether it is inverted? Assuming
>> this is a tet, it will be inverted (and thus have negative jacobians)
>> if you take one of the vertices and 'pull it through' the opposite
>> face. You say the solution
> Distinct, yes, but have you checked whether it is inverted? Assuming
> this is a tet, it will be inverted (and thus have negative jacobians)
> if you take one of the vertices and 'pull it through' the opposite
> face. You say the solution came from a previous libmesh run, what
> mesh format did
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Karen Lee wrote:
> Dear libmesh users and developers,
>
> 1) I'm having a problem where I'm reading in the solution obtained from a
> previous successful libmesh run to try to get the gradient of the solution
> and I'm getting the following error:
>
> ERROR: negativ
Dear libmesh users and developers,
1) I'm having a problem where I'm reading in the solution obtained from a
previous successful libmesh run to try to get the gradient of the solution
and I'm getting the following error:
ERROR: negative Jacobian: -2.55565e-10 in element 0
[0] src/fe/fe_map.C, lin
