Thanks John for the message. I am aware of your contribution in that end,
however, I was wondering if there was any progress with that class to any other
physics problem.
However, I would appreciate sharing your code, which (after reviewing to
understand more about the class and its implementat
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Vasileios Vavourakis
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has available to share with the users-list an
> example that utilises the *libMesh::ContinuationSystem* class.
>
> I aim developing a code in 3D elastostatics of a fibre-reinforced inelastic
>
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:13 PM, John Peterson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
> > If you don't have a bifurcation you can just write a loop around your
> > solver and ramp up your parameter each "step".
> >
>
We are trying to compare computational expense between
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> If you don't have a bifurcation you can just write a loop around your
> solver and ramp up your parameter each "step".
>
> John: does the ContinuationSystem offer any advantages in this case?
No, it will actually do more work, which is why
If you don't have a bifurcation you can just write a loop around your
solver and ramp up your parameter each "step".
John: does the ContinuationSystem offer any advantages in this case?
Derek
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:27 AM John Peterson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Harriet Li wrot
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Harriet Li wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm looking to solve a nonlinear problem where the nonlinearity is
> controlled by some parameter. The Newton solver does not converge at the
> desired parameter value without a better initial guess than I have.
>
> Is this a prob
