On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:13 PM Renato Poli wrote:
> The good news is that, if I "reinit" the equation systems in the first
> timestep only, it works beautifully.
> However, as I rely on this call to change the boundary conditions, that
> means I am not able to change the BCs during the run.
>
>
The good news is that, if I "reinit" the equation systems in the first
timestep only, it works beautifully.
However, as I rely on this call to change the boundary conditions, that
means I am not able to change the BCs during the run.
If it is a bug, it looks like workaroundable?
Perhaps forcing re
Is there any "close all" call?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:03 PM John Peterson wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:53 PM Renato Poli wrote:
>
>> Hi John
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> It seems that I moved one small step forward.
>> I added the coupling_functor as you advised - following misce
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:53 PM Renato Poli wrote:
> Hi John
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> It seems that I moved one small step forward.
> I added the coupling_functor as you advised - following miscellaneous_ex9.
> This way, I succeeded to solve the first timestep.
> I found out I needed to reinit
Hi John,
I am really stuck here... any clue would be helpful.
Can you tell me if the pattern below is familiar?
I could not get the "add_extra_ghost_elements" to work.
I am using individual "add_constrain_row" to model the rigid BC (DOF_I =
REFERENCE_DOF).
LibMesh fails when I call "reinit_consta
Hi John,
Should I consider "add_extra_ghost_elem"?
Then I add "row_constraints" between the DOFs I need to tie together and
this element.
Does that make sense?
If so, what element should I add? I just need a single DOF to tie many DOFs
together.
thanks,
Renato
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:07 PM Ren
Adding the mailing list in distribution...
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:03 PM Renato Poli wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Do you see a better way to do?
> I can see that Abaqus uses an extra node to tie all dofs together.
> I need the DOFs to be identical.
> That means eliminating lines in the matrix so that
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:43 PM Renato Poli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just refreshing this one, because I am sort of stuck in inserting a "rigid"
> BCs.
> It seems simple, but I cannot make it work.
>
Hi,
>From your error message, it sounds like you are introducing a coupling
(through the constraint
Hi all,
Just refreshing this one, because I am sort of stuck in inserting a "rigid"
BCs.
It seems simple, but I cannot make it work.
Some help would be handy...
Maybe adding an extra 'virtual' element would be the best idea?
How can I do that?
Thanks upfront.
Renato
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:52
