Re: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db] rhel,centos: Fix recommended resources

2018-05-02 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: >> >> Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau > > Actually, would you mind squashing the attached patch? I was a bit too > hasty

Re: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db] rhel,centos: Fix recommended resources

2018-04-10 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau Actually, would you mind squashing the attached patch? I was a bit too hasty pushing the asianux stuff, and it should be consistent with the RHEL7 values I think.

Re: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db] rhel,centos: Fix recommended resources

2018-04-10 Thread Christophe Fergeau
Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:53:26PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > Both RHEL and CentOS have some wrong values set for minimum and > recommended ram and storage size. > > I've adjusted the recommended resources values according to: >

[Libosinfo] [osinfo-db] rhel,centos: Fix recommended resources

2017-11-17 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
Both RHEL and CentOS have some wrong values set for minimum and recommended ram and storage size. I've adjusted the recommended resources values according to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio ---