On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Christophe Fergeau
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>>
>> Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
>
> Actually, would you mind squashing the attached patch? I was a bit too
> hasty
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
Actually, would you mind squashing the attached patch? I was a bit too
hasty pushing the asianux stuff, and it should be consistent with the
RHEL7 values I think.
Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:53:26PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> Both RHEL and CentOS have some wrong values set for minimum and
> recommended ram and storage size.
>
> I've adjusted the recommended resources values according to:
>
Both RHEL and CentOS have some wrong values set for minimum and
recommended ram and storage size.
I've adjusted the recommended resources values according to:
https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio
---