Re: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] rhel: Add rhel8.0 data
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:28 AM Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:22:19PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio > > --- > > data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in | 77 ++ > > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in > > > > diff --git a/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in > > b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000..5b3648d > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in > > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ > > + > > + > > + http://redhat.com/rhel/8.0;> > > +rhel8.0 > > +<_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 > > +8.0 > > +<_vendor>Red Hat, Inc > > +linux > > +rhel > > +http://redhat.com/rhel/7.6"/> > > + > > +prerelease > > + > > + > > + > > +LINUX > > +RHEL-8-0-BaseOS-x86_64 > > + > > + isolinux/vmlinuz > > + isolinux/initrd.img > > + > > + > > + > > + > > +PPC > > +RHEL[_-]8[_-]0[_-]BaseOS[_-]ppc64le > > Why the different volume-id for ppc64le compared to other arches? Looks > good apart from this That's an answer that I'd love to hear from the people producing the ISOs. :-/ For some reason PPC64LE boot ISo uses _ instead of -. > > Reviewed-by: Christophe Fergeau > > Christophe ___ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
Re: [Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] rhel: Add rhel8.0 data
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:22:19PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio > --- > data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in | 77 ++ > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in > > diff --git a/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in > b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in > new file mode 100644 > index 000..5b3648d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ > + > + > + http://redhat.com/rhel/8.0;> > +rhel8.0 > +<_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 > +8.0 > +<_vendor>Red Hat, Inc > +linux > +rhel > +http://redhat.com/rhel/7.6"/> > + > +prerelease > + > + > + > +LINUX > +RHEL-8-0-BaseOS-x86_64 > + > + isolinux/vmlinuz > + isolinux/initrd.img > + > + > + > + > +PPC > +RHEL[_-]8[_-]0[_-]BaseOS[_-]ppc64le Why the different volume-id for ppc64le compared to other arches? Looks good apart from this Reviewed-by: Christophe Fergeau Christophe signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
[Libosinfo] [osinfo-db PATCH] rhel: Add rhel8.0 data
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/powering-its-future-while-preserving-present-introducing-red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-beta Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio --- data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in | 77 ++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) create mode 100644 data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in diff --git a/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in new file mode 100644 index 000..5b3648d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/os/redhat.com/rhel-8.0.xml.in @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + http://redhat.com/rhel/8.0;> +rhel8.0 +<_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 +8.0 +<_vendor>Red Hat, Inc +linux +rhel +http://redhat.com/rhel/7.6"/> + +prerelease + + + +LINUX +RHEL-8-0-BaseOS-x86_64 + + isolinux/vmlinuz + isolinux/initrd.img + + + + +PPC +RHEL[_-]8[_-]0[_-]BaseOS[_-]ppc64le + + ppc/ppc64/vmlinuz + ppc/ppc64/initrd.img + + + + +LINUX +RHEL-8-0-BaseOS-aarch64 + + + + + +LINUX +RHEL-8-0-BaseOS-s390x + + + + + +1 +10 +2147483648 +10737418240 + + + +40 +2147483648 +21474836480 + + + + + +1 +10 +1073741824 +10737418240 + + + +10 +1073741824 +10737418240 + + + + -- 2.19.1 ___ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
