Re: [Libreoffice] Remove __FAR_DATA [PATCH]

Michael, under which name do you want this to be commited ? ( --author="Michael " ) Norbert On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:53 PM, wrote: > Here are patches to the various git repositories to remove the empty > __FAR_DATA macro from solar.h.  Changes are under LGPLv3+ / MPL as requested > (Altho

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:09:05PM +, Christopher Backhouse wrote: > Hi, > > This is item 3.17 in the easy hacks list. > Seems to work fine here. I can turn the quickstarter on and off and > launch things from it. > > The code is simplified a little from the libegg version (partially > becaus

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Caolan McNamara wrote: >> IIRC I tried this before, and there was some cockup under MacOSX, so if >> someone on MacOSX could see what findhome says and if its correct/wrong >> vs what works correctly there, that'd be helpful. >> > About 4k

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: quick stop

I had an issue with /bin/sh as the shebang. Kendy seems to have fixed that issue for me. What i have been informed as to why /bin/sh is being used is for portability. On 12/6/10 2:17 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: I found the simplest fix f

Re: [Libreoffice] Deleting Java from Base

Not necessarily. If there is a dev whose willing to do a port of said filters I would say have fun. I think porting the filters would be a great asset to this project as well as many other office related open source projects. On 12/6/10 6:50 AM, David Tardon wrote: On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:

Re: [Libreoffice] Deleting Java from Base

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:40:07PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Jonathan, *, > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Aquilina > wrote: > > i was talking to kendy this morning on irc and i was told that java is > > eventually going to be phased out its a matter of porting the code fr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] more SAL_N_ELEMENTS

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:09:35AM +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote: > hey, > > more use of the SAL_N_ELEMENTS macro like replacing the > STATIC_TABLE_SIZE macro. > > -- Kenneth Noel pushed it, thanks. D. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.free

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

Caolan McNamara wrote: > IIRC I tried this before, and there was some cockup under MacOSX, so if > someone on MacOSX could see what findhome says and if its correct/wrong > vs what works correctly there, that'd be helpful. > About 4k miles away from my MacBook currently - Norbert, Cloph, any chanc

Re: [Libreoffice] de-emphasisig java ... - summary so far ...

Christian Lohmaier wrote: > But it is more than clear that those users will then get the "This > function requires a JRE" notification. This hasn't been a problem in > OOo-land, so why should it be a problem for LO? > Because the default OOo install does include a JRE. Otherwise, I'm rather indiff

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: quick stop

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: > I found the simplest fix for it: > diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in > index 9e05c70..4fbbf4a 100644 > --- a/Makefile.in > +++ b/Makefile.in > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ >  # @configure_input@ >  # FIXME: create 'install' and 'check' target > > -S

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] configure.in patch for testing ...

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 05/12/10 23:05, Wols Lists wrote: >> Another configure to test ... I tweaked a bit the display. Pushed Norbert >> > Cheers, > Wol > > ___ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedeskto

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: quick stop

I found the simplest fix for it: diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in index 9e05c70..4fbbf4a 100644 --- a/Makefile.in +++ b/Makefile.in @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # @configure_input@ # FIXME: create 'install' and 'check' target -SHELL=/bin/sh +SHELL=/bin/bash all: dmake/dm...@exeext@ fetch @.

Re: [Libreoffice] configure.in patch for testing ...

On 05/12/10 23:05, Wols Lists wrote: > Another configure to test ... > Cheers, Wol >From 456c58cc44c68978facbdbc57e680758705a337c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wol Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 00:27:16 + Subject: [PATCH] Fix configure to work on gentoo --- configure.in | 79 +

Re: [Libreoffice] de-emphasisig java ... - summary so far ...

On 03/12/2010 Michael Meeks wrote: > We cannot bundle the JRE (as Oracle do) Wouldn't it be possible to bundle a free Java implementation? I haven't followed the status of the ongoing efforts toward a free Java recently, but if it is stable enough and cross-platform (I heard a Mac OS X version sta

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Clean code at impress

Sending for review, cover sd/slideshow/* revol_ cleancode-impress.slideshow.diff Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] configure.in for shm_get

the following patch worked for MacOS diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index d875950..ea6bea1 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -3674,8 +3674,8 @@ fi if test "$SOLAR_JAVA" != ""; then dnl first check if we have been asked to autodetect JAVA_HOME with a recent gij -

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed 01-16] [PATCH 01/16] warning variable unused fix in binfilter bf_sw attr

2010/12/5 Pierre-André Jacquod : > Hi, > here some patches to suppress warnings within binfilter. > I took a - sometimes too - conservative approach for doing this. Hope I > did not harm this module > regards Thnaks, I pushed the whole series... Norbert > > __

[Libreoffice] Patch for i115495: import problem with centered rtl tables from word

Hi, Can any one look at the small patch attached to http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115495 It would be nice to have this fixed in LibO 3.3, as this annoys a lot of users of the the RTL languages. Thanks Kaplan ___ LibreOffice mailing

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

On 05/12/10 20:40, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 17:24 +, Wols Lists wrote: >> Yup. findhome found the right place (or I assume it did). >> >> /opt/icedtea6-bin-1.9.1 > Yeah, so what I'd like to see is that findhome (or something like it) is > the normal way to get the jdk home

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 01/16] warning variable unused fix in binfilter bf_sw attr

Hello again, can't figure where the first patch is, currently only 2 -> 16 are on the list. Here again the first one. But if this is as last time, tomorrow you will have this mail twice.. regards Hi, here some patches to supp

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 17:24 +, Wols Lists wrote: > Yup. findhome found the right place (or I assume it did). > > /opt/icedtea6-bin-1.9.1 Yeah, so what I'd like to see is that findhome (or something like it) is the normal way to get the jdk home when one is not set via the --with-jdk-home. And

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 16/16] removing code due to endless loop

regards >From 6551d69a5fbc85f3af92cada84bf543a083d4453 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:05:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 16/16] removing code due to endless loop these part of code have been removed. The While(true) loop means either that

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 15/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter - bf_sw unocore

regards >From 151194c8a68754f9521bd485a9124f6e08f36239 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:58:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 15/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter - bf_sw unocore trying to stay on the safe side, means not always removing

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 14/16] fix warning unused param in binfilter bf_sw txtnode

regards >From 1a50712d282fd282ab53deb2fd7fb2e5acfa3807 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:23:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 14/16] fix warning unused param in binfilter bf_sw txtnode --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/txtnode/sw_atrfld.cxx |

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 13/16] fix warning in binfilter bf_sw tox

regards >From 239641e4b675424de81e45cb455e66b8127f9ff3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:01:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 13/16] fix warning in binfilter bf_sw tox --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/tox/sw_txmsrt.cxx |2 +- 1 files change

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 12/16] fix warning unused var binfilter bf_sw text

regards >From 22f6a25fcbba5eb41b73436f36a9542b2f898ef4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:38:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 12/16] fix warning unused var binfilter bf_sw text --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/text/sw_atrstck.cxx |5 ++---

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 11/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw swg

regards >From c8861cfc5de23428356c1a5cf6aaed6d2a0eced3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:13:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 11/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw swg --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/swg/sw_rdflds.cxx |2 +- bin

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 10/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw sw3io

regards >From 18b052aa37f4adb95f3250de4967b739bd14be11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:07:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 10/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw sw3io --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/sw3io/sw_sw3field.cxx |2 +

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 09/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw ole

regards >From 5a619e9399713a488eeadc484617e630ed9d06ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:02:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 09/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw ole --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/ole/sw_ndole.cxx |2 +- 1 fi

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 08/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw layout

regards >From 86062da5291cc62d4f378fb8adb366d696ee11b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:32:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 08/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw layout --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/layout/sw_atrfrm.cxx | 22

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 07/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw fields

regards >From 0049d6aa3dd25887c742b51a764776103e67daf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 15:44:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 07/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw fields still only fixes, no optimization has been done. On purpose, a

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 06/16] warning fix unused var in binfilter bf_sw draw

regards >From eac219396edebdf58deba912b02edac9a7999554 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 15:30:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 06/16] warning fix unused var in binfilter bf_sw draw --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/draw/sw_dcontact.cxx | 75 +++

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 05/16] warning fix unused var in binfilter bf_sw docnode

regards >From dafaabb2c38990bf4141c6074e15f0ca35d7e160 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 15:19:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 05/16] warning fix unused var in binfilter bf_sw docnode only warning removal, not code optimization, hence some funct

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 04/16] warning fix for unused var in binfilter bf_sw doc

regards >From 76026a3ef610c3b348f2fa514591e452eff3cd8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:56:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 04/16] warning fix for unused var in binfilter bf_sw doc This is warning removing, not code optimization => minimum ri

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 03/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw crsr

regards >From fe0b41fe4378e18478263caf8d09af1f3adafa28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 11:12:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 03/16] fix warning unused var in binfilter bf_sw crsr this is fixing warning, not optimizing. This means, some functio

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 02/16] warning fix unused variable in binfilter bf_sw bastyp

regards >From a03ec223cf70c17a1cd6bbf397dc954c8d9d13fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:25:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 02/16] warning fix unused variable in binfilter bf_sw bastyp --- binfilter/bf_sw/source/core/bastyp/sw_calc.cxx|

[Libreoffice] [PATCH 01/16] warning variable unused fix in binfilter bf_sw attr

Hi, here some patches to suppress warnings within binfilter. I took a - sometimes too - conservative approach for doing this. Hope I did not harm this module regards >From 3c2cd665fe8a344626265f6c8a2a3b195556441d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= Date: Sat, 4 D

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter and features...

On 12/05/2010 12:39 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > All true. It was just a note that it might be easier, if you have an > interest in binfilter, to just take the conservative approach and > silence warnings with e.g converting I was thinking of taking a 2 steps approach: first silent warning in a c

Re: [Libreoffice] List of Mirrors

Hi Rainer, *, On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > > any volunteers to complete > ? Does it make sense to have a manually maintained page when we're using mirrorbrain anyway? You can get a listing of mirrors that have the file by

Re: [Libreoffice] occured occurred

On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 14:35 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: I'm reading through these at the moment and applying them. So far so good, will have to skip the ones that change the external API in offapi however I think. Hmm. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list Li

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

Hi Andrea, all, On 05/12/2010 20:39, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not sure about bugs in localizations. So a major change with respect to the OpenOffi

Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria

On 26/11/2010 Petr Mladek wrote: > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria > Feel free to update it or propose improvements. Especially, I am not > sure about bugs in localizations. So a major change with respect to the OpenOffice.org release process would be that no explicit approval

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On 05/12/10 16:54, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 16:35 +, Wols Lists wrote: >> On 05/12/10 16:08, Caolán McNamara wrote: >>> On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 14:28 +, Wols Lists wrote: No luck, it's not working. And what's findhome.class supposed to be? A file in the directo

[Libreoffice] libreoffice-3-3, problem building sw

Title: Szalai Kálmán Hi, DO you have idea what went wrong? Entering /home/kami/git/libreoffice-3-3/build/build/libreoffice-3.3.0.1/sw/uiconfig/layout Entering /home/kami/git/libreoffice-3-3/build/build/libreoffice-3.3.0.1/sw/util Making:    l

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Remove dead codes from sd

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 22:43 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > Removing dead codes from sd. Looks good to me, pushed now. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 16:35 +, Wols Lists wrote: > On 05/12/10 16:08, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 14:28 +, Wols Lists wrote: > >> No luck, it's not working. And what's findhome.class supposed to be? A > >> file in the directory? Not there, I'm afraid :-( > > Look into t

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On 05/12/10 16:08, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 14:28 +, Wols Lists wrote: >> No luck, it's not working. And what's findhome.class supposed to be? A >> file in the directory? Not there, I'm afraid :-( > Look into the configure.in itself, and search for "findhome". Looks like >

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On 05/12/10 16:08, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 14:28 +, Wols Lists wrote: >> No luck, it's not working. And what's findhome.class supposed to be? A >> file in the directory? Not there, I'm afraid :-( > Look into the configure.in itself, and search for "findhome". Looks like >

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On 04/12/10 22:07, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > I had to add --with-jdk-home=/opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.20 > to my gentoo build. Can you please do a 'ls -al /usr/bin/javac' (assuming java was installed by your distro). I'm guessing it points to a symlink. And if that's a symlink, can you do a -al on that, to

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 14:28 +, Wols Lists wrote: > No luck, it's not working. And what's findhome.class supposed to be? A > file in the directory? Not there, I'm afraid :-( Look into the configure.in itself, and search for "findhome". Looks like that all the other (incredibly dodgy) hackery to

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On 05/12/10 14:28, Wols Lists wrote: > On 05/12/10 11:26, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 16:07 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >>> I had to add --with-jdk-home=/opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.20 >>> to my gentoo build. >> Hmm, I wonder. >> >> If you go to configure.in and change >> >> if test "x

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On 05/12/10 11:26, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 16:07 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> I had to add --with-jdk-home=/opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.20 >> to my gentoo build. > Hmm, I wonder. > > If you go to configure.in and change > > if test "x$with_jdk_home" = "x" -a "$_gij_longver" -ge "4

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

Hi, This is item 3.17 in the easy hacks list. Seems to work fine here. I can turn the quickstarter on and off and launch things from it. The code is simplified a little from the libegg version (partially because I removed a few what now seem to be be unnecessary hacks). Hints on removing libe

[Libreoffice] List of Mirrors

Hi any volunteers to complete ? Thanks Rainer Bielefeld ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ cppcheck report server problem

Just a note to state that the top entry in the cppcheck report list is basically a false positive. Standlone example now logged as https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cppcheck/ticket/2279 C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org h

[Libreoffice] RC1 Help

Hi, can someone please urgently check ? Best regards Rainer Bielefeld ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove dead codes from sd

Hi, Removing dead codes from sd. Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe >From 11834378cb34a21be9e80740718d74251725717b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takeshi Abe Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:42:19 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Remove dead codes from sd --- sd/source/filter/eppt/pptx-epptooxml.cxx |4 --- s

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Impress and draw cleanup session

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 00:26 +0200, Roth Robert wrote: > Patch co-licensed as usual under LGPLv3+, GPLv3+ and MPL licenses. > Patch made for sd repository, I hope it's not a problem. Looks good to me. Pushed, thanks for this. I did drop one tiny little bit that has a "TODO" on it. Probably pointl

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: commented out code in sd

On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 17:32 -0800, Kayo Hamid wrote: > Covering sd/source/{filter,helper}. Looks ok, now pushed. Thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffic

Re: [Libreoffice] FOSDEM foo ...

HI Michael, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Suren, >e more time for the patch to mature ? > >        Wow - it's always the right time to apply for a FOSDEM paper :-) just > whack your name in the wiki, and encourage your friends to come. > > ... >        Incidentally; th

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter and features...

On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 10:59 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > On 12/04/2010 09:49 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > > I wouldn't like to see too much effort spent on binfilter though. > I understand the point. On the other side, leting it behind generate a > lot of - not very useful - job when wan

Re: [Libreoffice] "bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch" on boostrap build

On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 16:52 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > apparently -mtune=atom require gcc 4.5. uh huh, fair enough. I've tweaked things to try and use the version number as the default ARCH_FLAGS for this now. Does that break things again, or continue to work ? C.

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 16:07 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > I had to add --with-jdk-home=/opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.20 > to my gentoo build. Hmm, I wonder. If you go to configure.in and change if test "x$with_jdk_home" = "x" -a "$_gij_longver" -ge "40200"; then to if test "x$with_jdk_home" = "x"; the

Re: [Libreoffice] binfilter and features...

On 12/04/2010 09:49 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > I wouldn't like to see too much effort spent on binfilter though. I understand the point. On the other side, leting it behind generate a lot of - not very useful - job when wanting to do global changes, like the RTL_CONST... macro, or getting ride o

Re: [Libreoffice] Enable build of ure and extension

Hi, thank you very much for checking them. Well, after a good night of sleep, I have just realized that since the change to the new build system my root directory is a real mess. For sure, I did not do it the right way and then focussed on the patches ready before the upgrade. Thanks for your pa