Hi Skyler
On 25/03/11 07:22, Skyler Hawthorne wrote:
vcl/source/window/printdlg.cxx implements vcl/inc/vcl/prndlg.hxx,
so I've renamed the .cxx file so it remains consistent, yet doesn't
break the API.
Thanks for the patch, I don't want to sound discouraging but really I am
not sure we really
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 16:32 -0400, Clio wrote:
It seems that python scripting is not working in dev300m103 as it was
the case with LibO 3.3.0
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33355). (Maybe the fix is
not in 3.4 yet?)
Sorry, what's your bug ? Are you reporting that in
Hi Julien,
This looks nice ! thanks for that :-) should make the IDL and the
generated headers much more readable. Having said that things like:
-#ifndef __com_sun_star_uno_XInterface_idl__
#include com/sun/star/uno/XInterface.idl
-#endif
-#ifndef
thanks!!
On 25/03/11 17:44, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi Lubos
On 25/03/11 18:52, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 25 of March 2011, Noel Power wrote:
Ewww ...
class SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT IFieldmark
: virtual public IMark
...
class SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT ICheckboxFieldmark
: virtual public IFieldmark
...
IFieldmark*
Hello everyone,
I've started work on removing all calls to SfxItemSet::Put(SfxPoolItem ,
int which) from the code. Attached the first two patches,
which contains mostly easy cases: Almost all SfxPoolItems already contained
the right WhichID, so the extra argument could
just be removed. But there
Hi Rafael, and Octavio,
First - welcome to the project; no doubt your design insight will be
appreciated on the design list: des...@libreoffice.org
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 14:40 -0300, Rafael Daud wrote:
I've just joined the development list, and don't have any programming
skills worth
Hi Rainer,
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 18:01 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
please excuse me for another annoying Test, unfortunately I have some
problems with this particular mailing list (all other ones work fine). I
can read, but not post, and sender
Last I checked, we are not even
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 10:21 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
Still I think there is something strange happening here
Are we certain that we compiled the key method of the class (I forget
how this is calculated ;-) where the vtable is emitted with exceptions
enabled (which AFAIR enables rtti and
On 25/03/11 19:48, Xisco Faulí wrote:
Hi,
This macro is never defined so I delete it.
well I think we'll keep it, I think it is useful, is seems to be failrly
new ( commited 2010-07-26 ) developer only debug tracing, it isn't
defined so it isn't enabled unintentionally, personally I'd like
Hi Miklos,
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 17:16 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
So I just went the route what Michael suggested, to keep the patch sort,
see the attachement.
So - of course you should push that :-)
Of course, in a separate future patch it would be interesting to fix
SfxTabDialog
On Friday 25 of March 2011, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
Hello,
On 03/25/2011 02:13 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 25 of March 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
argh!, I meant to say then things are *not* too bad, not *too* bad.
I mean that's far less that I would have feared, quite
Norbert Thiebaud píše v Ne 27. 03. 2011 v 11:24 -0500:
translate_toolkit seems upset that we build for a 10.4 target despite
being on a 10.6 machine...
mkdir: ./unxmacxi.pro/misc/build/translate-toolkit-1.8.1/: File exists
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./setup.py, line 397, in
Hi,
formula and sfx2 pushed. The files WriterHelper.java and
DocumentMetadataAccess.java changed their place in the code tree but
DocumentMetaData.java seems to have been removed.
Christina
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces
Andras Timar píše v Pá 25. 03. 2011 v 21:47 +0100:
Hi Petr,
Petr Mladek píše v Čt 24. 03. 2011 v 21:38 +0100:
Worked well, so I have just pushed it.
Here is the patch of the build repository (master). It is enough not to
call localize-ooo.
I went through localize-ooo and I found that
Hi,
there are some places where _USE_UNO is #defined and some lines later it
is queried via #ifdef. It seems that _USE_UNO could be removed in that
context.
Veto or go?
Christina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Theo,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:25:32 +0200
Theo van Klaveren
theo.van.klave...@gmail.com wrote:
I've started work on removing all calls to
SfxItemSet::Put(SfxPoolItem , int which) from the code. Attached the
first two patches, which contains mostly easy cases: Almost all
SfxPoolItems
On 25/03/11 19:46, Kayo Hamid wrote:
This patch removes some variableScope warnings from
http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com, sending for review.
revol_
looks good to me, pushed
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Christina,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:45:49 +0200
Christina Roßmanith chrrossman...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
during patch reviewing I came across the following:
file: sfx2/source/view/frame.cxx
int SfxUsrAnyItem::operator==( const SfxPoolItem /*rItem*/ ) const
{
return sal_False;
}
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||31606
Mostly pushed as is,
I changed in slot.cxx
+for (SvSlotElementList::iterator it = pCurSlot+1; it !=
rSlotList.end(); ++it)
to
SvSlotElementList::iterator it = ( pCurSlot != rSlotList.end()
) ? ++pCurSlot : rSlotList.end();
for ( ; it != rSlotList.end(); ++it)
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened during the 12th week in 2011
on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches:
+ master:hot LO-3.4 development
+ libreoffice-3-3: fixes for next LO-3.3.x bug fix release
There are two logs for each branch:
adding pushed as I see it is already committed
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Hugo,
I'm adding the libreoffice dev mailing list in CC, please prefer this
way to communicate as others can help you too.
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 10:29 -0300, Hugo Leonardo Melo dos Santos wrote:
I have read some bugs. I am interested to solve the bug 34413, but I do not
know if this is
Last time It was used was back in 2000.
From a4b55d6390006b032a34cc6a252726d3e35e2dcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xisco Fauli aniste...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:03:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unotest macro
---
basic/source/app/mybasic.cxx | 22 --
1 files
Hi Kevin, *;
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Kevin Hunter hunt...@earlham.edu wrote:
At 10:39am -0400 Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
It will then send a probe/warning message, and if that is rejected as
well, send a last
On 28/03/11 16:07, Xisco Faulí wrote:
Last time It was used was back in 2000.
right, seems completely useless, pushed ( presumably this contribution
GPL3+/GPL3+/MPL ) and thanks for the patch!!!
Noel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||35744
--
At 11:36am -0400 Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
At 10:39am -0400 Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
it smells like a misconfiguration of the list or FDO's mailing
setup somewhere.
Is there something obvious I'm
Hi all,
the development of LibreOffice and its features are growing every day and week
;-)
In my opinion it would be a good idea to have a special build (nightly build or
something similar) with a special naming, maybe LibO-Future, so that it is
posible to
install that build in parallel on
Hey,
No I just installed the rpm libreoffice-bootstrap package
with the following description:
libreoffice-bootstrap - LibreOffice Build Bootstrap
This packages provides the basic tools and framework for building
LibreOffice using separate source packages.
I did not install the source
Hi Kayo,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:53:10 -0300
Kayo Hamid
kayo.ha...@gekkolinux.com.br wrote:
Hey, we have one inconsistency with EasyHack marks at Bugzilla. Some
are EasyHack and others [EasyHack], the result is:
13 bugs -
Hi *. Sorry to say that it appears a hardware problem (bad RAM) has put
a stop to cppcheck's 5 hour report runs that get pushed to
http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ . I'm RMA-ing the RAM today, and
hopefully we'll see the replacements in a few weeks, if not sooner.
Sorry for not writing
33 matches
Mail list logo
