Hi Josh, Regina, Astron!
Josh, thanks for the patch and the screenshot - the latter makes
evaluating things for less developers (tm) like myself very quick and
easy.
Am Donnerstag, den 11.08.2011, 12:29 +0930 schrieb Josh Heidenreich:
Hi All,
I have made some additional changes to the
I noticed that cppcheck made its report on the old repositories too, is it
possible to remove the cppcheck scan on these ?
Julien.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/http-libreoffice-boldandbusted-com-cppcheck-report-jobs-stalled-tp2745270p3244910.html
Sent
This is a library pull request.
Please could someone upload
http://sourceforge.net/projects/silgraphite/files/graphite2/graphite2-1.0.1.tgz/download
to htp://download.go-oo.org/src I will then submit a patch to integrate the
graphite2 release into libo (simplifying the existing patches, no
Hi Harri,
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 22:02 +0300, Harri Pitkänen wrote:
My ultimate goal is to reach a point where we could drop all browser specific
or legacy HTML formats and just have one HTML export format that works in all
browsers (or at least in those that 99 % of people use). Or if it
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:28:42PM +0200, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
For which I always recommend xmlpp,
http://software.decisionsoft.com/tools.html
Is this better in some aspect than xmllint --format, which cames with
libxml and requires no manual installation? :)
Thanks.
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Noack píše v Ne 07. 08. 2011 v 14:32 +0200:
Very good questions ... it would be cool if some of us (QA, dev, UX)
could chat about that (Hackfest in Munich, anyone?). At the end, Easy
Hacks is only one way how an issue / wish is turned in something a new
developer may
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 09:25 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:28:42PM +0200, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
For which I always recommend xmlpp,
http://software.decisionsoft.com/tools.html
Many thanks Eike for that tool: I think I'll replace xmllint --format by
this ;)
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina píše v St 10. 08. 2011 v 11:39 +0200:
Kendy shouldnt opengrok still be indexing the old build system for those
building 3.4.x ?
[Stripped the unnecessary context that you've let in the mail...]
No need to, all the 3.4 fixes have to be backports from master
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
[Postgresql connector]
And the libreoffice pre-commit hooks complain about that. I was
wondering if by any chance there is a general authorisation by Sun /
Oracle that relicenses *all* OpenOffice-related code to LGPLv3 that
would apply _also_ to this code?
Hi
some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
I see the excellent Tinderbox work is going strong. If my report isn't
really useful anymore due to work elsewhere, please let me know. Time
moves on, and perhaps this kind of thing is no longer useful or wanted.
Hi Jesse - nah, quite the opposite, your
On 10/08/11 17:54, Tom Tromey wrote:
I tried building LibreOffice with svn trunk gcc; though in this case the
bug seems to be a fairly generic include order problem.
The build dies in cosv with:
Compiling: cosv/source/strings/string.cxx
In file included from ../../inc/cosv/string.hxx:33:0,
On 10/08/11 18:14, Tom Tromey wrote:
I tried building LibreOffice with svn trunk gcc.
It dies in o3tl with:
In file included from
/home/tromey/Space/LibreOffice/bootstrap/o3tl/qa/test-vector_pool.cxx:8:0:
Caolan McNamara wrote:
We don't use these AFAIK.
Wow, one month to get to this mail - anyway, if anyone has hints on
how to keep especially the pdf backend working, that would be
appreciated. Could be a nice start of adding a feature to have
librsvg render natively to pdf ...
Cheers,
--
On 11/08/11 09:36, Noel Power wrote:
[...]
pushed to master
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1a35f23a2ccb17c3e8e0cb218bb1cf886b4c7124
modified subject to PUSHED
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On 10/08/11 18:49, Tom Tromey wrote:
I tried building LibreOffice with svn trunk gcc.
It dies in sax with:
In file included from
/home/tromey/Space/LibreOffice/bootstrap/sax/source/tools/fastserializer.cxx:33:0:
On 11/08/11 02:59, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
[...]
2/ I am not well equipped to apply in-lined patch like that (I use
gmail as main mailbox for this dev-list... so it is cut-and-paste with
horror stories about line wrapping and all)
could you use git format-patch to generate patches and attach
Seeing this is pushed.
Olivier Hallot wrote:
License is LGPLV3 + MPL
Hi Olivier, can you please confirm your patch is LGPLv3+ / MPL
(to avoid any ambiguities)?
Thanks,
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpvTID2joUA7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
I guess Bjoern knows most about this, adding him to cc list, think he is
on vacation now but surely will look when he gets back
Noel
On 10/08/11 22:56, Henrik Jensen wrote:
Patches licensed under LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1 ( or what ever Bjoern Michaelsen prefers
:-) )
A series of 7 suggested patches
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Wednesday, 2011-08-10 17:48:14 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
For performance reasons, it (like all the other xcu files, too) got
folded into a single large main.xcd. (Beware, very long lines. You
may want to pipe it through an XML pretty
Jambunathan K wrote:
I am running in to an issue while converting from odt to Microsoft Word
97 format. The problem is that some sections of the odt file are
differently formatted in word document.
Please file a bug, with your sample files attached, here:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org - use
Hello Aaron
Aaron Rasmussen aaron.rasmussen@... writes:
When I run the program, everything builds and runs without any error messages,
the LO application starts
up, but no spreadsheet is ever created. I get the launch screen if I click on
the LO icon in the dock.
I'm wondering if there
On 10/08/11 18:44, Jenei Gábor wrote:
Hello Noel,
Well, I just like more if{ linefeedcodelinefeed } form even is
code is just one line long, but you are right
there are no rules about this, but it is the convention to at least
follow the pattern already used in the source file otherwise
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:22 PM, julien2412 wrote:
cppcheck has detected 1 Throwing exception in destructor line 88 of
core/bridges/test/java_uno/acquire/testacquire.cxx
(sorry I mentionned 2 locations on IRC cause I forgot about the new git repo
: it was in core and old ure repo)
Could it be
On Wednesday 10 of August 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 09 of August 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Technically, lostd::list is no longer a container, as it violates the
requirement that the return type of size() is size_type. (And
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:30 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
On 08/04/2011 01:56 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
For this one at least, the assert itself was bogus for the empty
paragraph case, fixed with
Josh, thanks for the patch and the screenshot - the latter makes
evaluating things for less developers (tm) like myself very quick and
easy.
No problem
Hence, my question whether a semi-automatic extraction of short
versions of the file type...
I like this idea quite a bit
Mmh, although it
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Noack schrieb:
Hi Josh, Regina, Astron!
[..]
Another thing I've thought about is keep, use anyway, ... Only the
visual marker on the button reveals the default choice in the dialog
(grrr, different to LibreOffice ODF default - didn't notice that) - so
my take is to
Hi All,
I think, that does not solve the keep problem. The document, the user is
working on, _is_ in ODF Format. So saying Switch to ODK Format makes no
sense to him. The user relates (or might relate) the button caption not to
the target file format but to the source file format. So the
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
After a long hiatus, this service is back on the air. I swapped out the
bad RAM for some good RAM, and hooray, we've got a fresh cppcheck report
at http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ .
gives a 403 forbidden error right
[ Premise: If you think adding something to LO code is easy, you are still an
inexperienced LO developer. ]
#include tools/time.hxx
...
printf( %d\n, Time( 25, 0, 0 ).GetHour());
printf( %d\n, ( Time( 1, 0, 10 ) - Time( 1, 0, 20 )).GetSec());
25
10
As much as I don't like it, I can possibly
BANNED CONTENTS ALERT
Our content checker found
banned name: .exe,.exe-ms,.txt ... .exe
in email presumably from you libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
to the following recipient:
- jbelt...@iqfarma.com
Our internal reference code for your message is 22512-11/BHV4qPSr8+9R
First upstream
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:43 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Does somebody know why the Time class does either of these and how much would
break if I fixed these two to be sane?
I don't know, but I would guess that it is used for delta times as well
as wall clock times. That would certainly explain
Hi all,
I fixed fdo#37403 a while ago, and Rainer asked if we could cherry-pick
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=21ec661d09ed9d7bbbec5e52ee2b382d8c465324
to 3.4.2.
Can someone review, sign-off and cherry-pick it?
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 15:36 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hi all,
I fixed fdo#37403 a while ago, and Rainer asked if we could cherry-pick
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=21ec661d09ed9d7bbbec5e52ee2b382d8c465324
to 3.4.2.
Forgot all about that one. Don't you
Hi,
On Thursday, 2011-08-11 10:15:02 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
And the libreoffice pre-commit hooks complain about that. I was
wondering if by any chance there is a general authorisation by Sun /
Oracle that relicenses *all* OpenOffice-related code to LGPLv3 that
would apply _also_
Hello Thosrten
I do confirm.
Kind regards
Olivier
2011/8/11 Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org
Seeing this is pushed.
Olivier Hallot wrote:
License is LGPLV3 + MPL
Hi Olivier, can you please confirm your patch is LGPLv3+ / MPL
(to avoid any ambiguities)?
Thanks,
Hello Kohei, Eike, Caolán
Thank you guys for the coding advise and commit.
I take note on the added value in optimizing code to squeeze CPU cycles. So
far I was coding caring on legibility and understandability.
Kind regards
Olivier
2011/8/11 Kohei Yoshida kohei.yosh...@suse.com
On Wed,
Meta-reply: I am far from contributing a patch, so my
thoughts are off-topic for this list. I am happy to take
this conversation to private email or to the discussion list
if that would better suit the list recipients.
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:43 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
[ Premise: If you
Lubos Lunak wrote:
As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least some reason for time
having 25 hours, but 10 seconds without 20 seconds being 10 seconds (and
there is actually explicit code to ensure that)?
Does somebody know why the Time class does either of these and how
Norbert == Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com writes:
Norbert 1/ Are we sure that this behavior will be seen in a _released_ gcc ?
Norbert (not a rhetorical question, I'm a bit weary of chasing gcc trunk that
Norbert closely)
I believe so; or at least, this is definitely a bug in LibreOffice.
Noel I rolled up this patch and the previous one here
Noel
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c2a634416ba8f385c25c16cc52aeae6f68cab9db
I don't understand where these commits go.
I re-pulled in 'ure' (actually everywhere using ./g pull) but I don't
see that commit. I'm on
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:09:39AM -0600, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
Noel I rolled up this patch and the previous one here
Noel
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c2a634416ba8f385c25c16cc52aeae6f68cab9db
I don't understand where these commits go.
I re-pulled
Hello Tom,
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 09:09 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
Noel I rolled up this patch and the previous one here
Noel
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c2a634416ba8f385c25c16cc52aeae6f68cab9db
I don't understand where these commits go.
I re-pulled in 'ure'
Miklos Yes, core.git. See
Miklos
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build#Getting_the_sources
Miklos Background:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/One_Git_Conversion
Thanks. I must have read some stale document before starting; but
unfortunately I don't recall
On 11/08/11 16:09, Tom Tromey wrote:
Noel I rolled up this patch and the previous one here
Noel
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c2a634416ba8f385c25c16cc52aeae6f68cab9db
I don't understand where these commits go.
I re-pulled in 'ure' (actually everywhere using ./g
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:29 +0930, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
I have attached a patch also.
Looks a good start to me, overly-wide alright for some of the filter
names, but when it appears it's obvious without reading war and peace
which button I want, which makes it better I reckon.
Pushed as a
Hi Lubos,
On Thursday, 2011-08-11 14:43:28 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
#include tools/time.hxx
...
printf( %d\n, Time( 25, 0, 0 ).GetHour());
printf( %d\n, ( Time( 1, 0, 10 ) - Time( 1, 0, 20 )).GetSec());
25
10
As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least some reason for
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:15 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
[Postgresql connector]
And the libreoffice pre-commit hooks complain about that. I was
wondering if by any chance there is a general authorisation by Sun /
Oracle that relicenses *all*
Le 11/08/11 16:05, Eike Rathke a écrit :
Hi Eike,
The current state of affairs from what I know is that the list of files
prepared contains all files of OOO340 plus all new files in all of the
pending CWSs. Whether all of the files really will end up at AOOo is yet
to be seen. But I'm fairly
Hi Olivier,
On Thursday, 2011-08-11 11:26:28 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
I take note on the added value in optimizing code to squeeze CPU cycles. So
far I was coding caring on legibility and understandability.
Bear in mind that usually micro-optimizing code isn't worth the time as
modern
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 18:14 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 11/08/11 16:05, Eike Rathke a écrit :
Hi Eike,
The current state of affairs from what I know is that the list of files
prepared contains all files of OOO340 plus all new files in all of the
pending CWSs. Whether all of the
Hi,
The attached patch allowed me to build and dev-install (wikihelp opens
properly) master without cloning the help repo (saving 20MB of download
of something I don't need during development in most cases).
The Android/iOS part is because Tor already introduced a DESKTOP build
type where
Le 11/08/11 18:29, drew a écrit :
Hi Drew,
I'm not sure it ever was - you get the binary from the main OO.o webstie
and not the extensions site (that never changed did it?)
Yep, and it was only available for certain OSes (not Mac, which is my
main platform).
the only source I knew off was
Hi.
I have just found another (pretty big, I think) usability problem with
the dialogue: it doesn't have a Cancel button that would abort the
save. Pressing Esc currently selects the Save in ODF Format button.
To keep the user in control (quote from Gnome HIG again) Josh,
would you mind thinking
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:22 PM, julien2412 wrote:
...
Could it be replaced by just a log (which function should be used for
this
kind of case ?) or something since a throw in destructor should be
avoided ?
Given that assertNotNull() further down in that file uses
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 06:42:52PM +0200, Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org
wrote:
The attached patch allowed me to build and dev-install (wikihelp opens
properly) master without cloning the help repo (saving 20MB of download
of something I don't need during development in most cases).
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 01:11:43PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 11:32 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Ah, I found:
solenv/bin/linkoo:export SAL_ALLOW_LINKOO_SYMLINKS=1
sc/source/ui/vba/testvba/runTests.pl: $ENV{SAL_ALLOW_LINKOO_SYMLINKS} =
1;
Hi All,
I have the third version of the patch.
See also this screen:
http://thejosh.info/libreoffice/export_format_v3.png
Is it possible to get this into master?
Commit message:
Alien save dialog to include format name on save button
Licenced under LGPLv3/MPL
I'm going to do another one
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:55:02AM -0400, drew wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:15 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
[Postgresql connector]
I was wondering if by any chance there is a general authorisation
by Sun / Oracle that relicenses *all* OpenOffice-related code
59 matches
Mail list logo
