Re: [Libreoffice] Are these wmf files real malware or just antivirus false positive?

2011-08-27 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello Caolán, * On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 16:22, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 10:59 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: I found that you have committed these files, so I write to ask you that: is it false positive of antivirus? They undoubtedly have the same

[Libreoffice] Wrong Email ID

2011-08-27 Thread exemp
Dear, The email you sent to ceasefire.in has been redirected to this id. That means the email id you typed is either not correct or not existing. You are requested to correct the email id and resend your mail. Regards Ceasefire IT Team ___

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add numbering type of arabic abjad sequence

2011-08-27 Thread Mohammad Elahi
A localized numbering type base on arabic abjad sequence is added base on a table. From 41d106c1303a53edae8551dfde7f1b35e7d67685 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mohammad Elahi elahimoham...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 03:45:19 +0430 Subject: [PATCH] Add numbering type of arabic abjad sequence

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Make numbering more flexible by custom separator

2011-08-27 Thread Mohammad Elahi
Make numbering more flexible by using custom separators. So that numbers like 3-2(a) can be used instead of boring 3.2.a. Everything for the goal was available so a simple hack in code makes it ready to use. By this patch suffix and prefix in number styles are used only for specified level number

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] some refactoring in xmlcelli.cxx

2011-08-27 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello, In my attempt to understand the xml import a bit better I found some places I think we could easily refactor a bit. It would be nice if someone could give it a quick review before I push it. Especially the long if statement is a bit tricky but I think that only the first line was needed.

Re: [Libreoffice] Build break in module basic

2011-08-27 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Eike, Eike Rathke schrieb: Hi Regina, On Wednesday, 2011-08-24 14:40:54 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: Tor Lillqvist schrieb: Maybe getting make 3.82 from http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/make/ helps, Or even our own make 3.82 with some useful debugging and warning options added from

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add numbering type of arabic abjad sequence

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mohammad, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 04:11:33 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote: A localized numbering type base on arabic abjad sequence is added base on a table. Nice patch, I'll integrate it. Please confirm that this and your further contributions are licensed under LGLPv3+ and MPL 1.1 It

Re: [Libreoffice] Build break in module basic

2011-08-27 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Eike, Eike Rathke schrieb: Hi Regina, On Friday, 2011-08-26 13:02:23 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: I follow your link, but I don't know how to use it. Should be quite similar to building upstream make I mentioned earlier cd dev-tools/make-3.82-gbuild The problem is earlier. How to

Re: [Libreoffice] Build break in module basic

2011-08-27 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi, I found it. The zip-files are under commit. kind regards Regina Regina Henschel schrieb: Hi Eike, Eike Rathke schrieb: Hi Regina, On Friday, 2011-08-26 13:02:23 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: I follow your link, but I don't know how to use it. Should be quite similar to building

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Unity Quick List in StartCenter desktop file

2011-08-27 Thread Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai
Title: Szalai Kálmán Hi! Have you got any reference for this? I just found only this, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/720716/comments/2 not a blueprint. I still think it is useful improvement for Startcenter item. KAMI

Re: [Libreoffice] Build break in module basic

2011-08-27 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Eike, the files from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/make-3.82-gbuild result in errors too in step 'make check' 6 Tests in 6 Categories Failed (See .diff files in work dir for details) :-( make[2]: *** [check-regression] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory

[Libreoffice] CAD

2011-08-27 Thread 810d4rk
Hi, there is a discussion on librecad website about the idea of including the CAD application with libreoffice, if there is anyone interested in joining you are welcome! Just go to the dev mailing list on librecad.org -- Thanks ___ LibreOffice mailing

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add numbering type of arabic abjad sequence

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mohammad, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 19:35:52 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote: Yes these are licensed under LGLPv3+ and MPL 1.1. Fine. I used http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ to get the source, maybe I should update my repository. The core repo only exists since a week or

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] some refactoring in xmlcelli.cxx

2011-08-27 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Markus, On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote: It would be nice if someone could give it a quick review before I push it. Looks good to me. The second hunk was a bit hard to grok, but I came to the same conclusion as you did. Especially the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add numbering type of arabic abjad sequence

2011-08-27 Thread Mohammad Elahi
The core repo only exists since a week or two so things have changed since you obtained the source. You'll need to clone that core git repo once and do an initial build. OK. I'll clone it again. Thanks. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice] monimega.com Shop|Techsup|WebDesign

2011-08-27 Thread Monimega
http://monimega.com Monimega, Shopping is cool! A new advanced Megastore about hi-tech, computing, audio, video and more... now at your service. http://monimega.com/it/ Monimega: 6 Paesi europei. 20.000 prodotti delle migliori marche al mondo. Veloce, sicuro, economico, affidabile.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add numbering type in persian word.

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mohammad, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 04:10:40 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote: Numbering in localized persian word is useful in some areas, at least for me it is necessary. Since it is not trivial a function and table is needed. Good one, I'll also integrated this. I added quite a few spaces

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add numbering type in persian word.

2011-08-27 Thread Mohammad Elahi
Thanks for informative and helpful comments, I'll try to use them ;) Thanks. Again Elahi ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Make numbering more flexible by custom separator

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mohammad, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 04:09:34 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote: By this patch suffix and prefix in number styles are used only for specified level number not on the whole number. So the hardcoded . separator was removed. While replacing the hardcoded '.' may be a good thing, I'm

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Make numbering more flexible by custom separator

2011-08-27 Thread Mohammad Elahi
Thanks for review. maybe you are right. My problem was somehow the same as these links: http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7t=37009 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21387 Maybe the best solution is another property instead of prefix and suffix to format

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] some refactoring in xmlcelli.cxx

2011-08-27 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello Eike, 2011/8/27 Eike Rathke o...@erack.de Hi Markus, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 15:24:31 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: -if ( (!pOUTextContent !pOUText !pOUTextValue) - ( (pOUTextContent !pOUTextContent-getLength()) ||

Re: [Libreoffice] code simplification: please logic review, to be sure

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Pierre-André, On Friday, 2011-08-26 22:23:07 +0200, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: But this basically, this just ensure that the return value is not NULL (comparing the pointer SwFrm* with 0 ) So I though the final version to be: if( 0 != ( pONd = aIdx.GetNode().GetOLENode() )

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Make numbering more flexible by custom separator

2011-08-27 Thread Mohammad Elahi
You are right, I should not remove those conditions with no prior thinking ;) But maybe the prefix and suffix can be used like what I thought. Any way this needs more thinking and more search for possible side effects. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] how to handle this bug (if this is one?)

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Pierre-André, On Friday, 2011-08-26 23:19:34 +0200, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: in vcl/win/source/gdi/winlayout.cxx, around line 695 there is: long SimpleWinLayout::FillDXArray( long* pDXArray ) const { +if( !mnWidth ) +{ +long mnWidth = mnBaseAdv; +for( int

Re: [Libreoffice] Build break in module basic

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Regina, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 18:22:12 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: the files from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/make-3.82-gbuild Btw, as dev-tools is a git repo, all (~10MB) can be obtained by invoking git clone

Re: [Libreoffice] Build break in module basic

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Regina, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 15:55:37 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: The build breakers are all solved now. But build time is again about 18 hours. And I had been down to 5 hours for OOo. So a make-solution is absolutely necessary. Whoops.. is your $HOME directory on a different volume

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Add numbering type of arabic abjad sequence

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mohammad, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 04:11:33 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote: A localized numbering type base on arabic abjad sequence is added base on a table. Pushed on master http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9e1b651db768667ab7f87d66a225ea008b4bd811 Thanks Eike --

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Add numbering type in persian word.

2011-08-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mohammad, On Saturday, 2011-08-27 04:10:40 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote: Numbering in localized persian word is useful in some areas, at least for me it is necessary. Since it is not trivial a function and table is needed. Pushed on master

Re: [Libreoffice] http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ cppcheck report jobs stalled... no longer! :)

2011-08-27 Thread Jesse Adelman
Hi Julien and *, Can you specify which repos are now deprecated, explicitly? Or point me to a document that states what's still active and what is not? It's the etc. that's confusing me. ;) I'll remove the directories/repos you list. Best, Jesse Adelman Brisbane, CA On 08/25/11 22:53,

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Unity Quick List in StartCenter desktop file

2011-08-27 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi KAMI, On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:06:18 +0200 Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai kami...@gmail.com wrote: Have you got any reference for this? It was discussed with in the session for this blueprint at UDS-O in Budapest, its not in the notes, but you can hear it in the audio recording, I hope (minute 47 ff.):

[Libreoffice] looking for scripting help

2011-08-27 Thread Steven Howe
Hi, if discovered that ODF format does not 'save as' in word 'doc' format all that well. My partner is trying to get a manuscript written. Publishers are cheap and generally a few thousand years behind the times. I'm surprised we still are writing on goat skin. So. The problem. 'save as'

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Unity Quick List in StartCenter desktop file

2011-08-27 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
thanks! Kami 2011/8/28, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@gmail.com: Hi KAMI, On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:06:18 +0200 Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai kami...@gmail.com wrote: Have you got any reference for this? It was discussed with in the session for this blueprint at UDS-O in Budapest, its not in

Re: [Libreoffice] http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ cppcheck report jobs stalled... no longer! :)

2011-08-27 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello Jesse, * On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:13, Jesse Adelman some...@boldandbusted.com wrote: Can you specify which repos are now deprecated, explicitly? Or point me to a document that states what's still active and what is not? It's the etc. that's confusing me. ;) I'll remove the

[Libreoffice] a few things about ./g, git and git hooks

2011-08-27 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
I have given the repo translations its own set of git-hooks. that way the special 'po' handling that was in pre-commit is now only in translations, and translations' pre-commit does not have whitespace-checking since this never apply to it. This triggered changes in ./g to link the git-hooks