On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:30:03 +0100
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Stephan,
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8907d159378b518a769e9f8c4f67290ec588a77d
Temporary hack to work around autodoc bug made it even more evident
that our home-brewed
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:57:58 +0100
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/04/2012 03:58 PM, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
I would not like to see a new configure flag for doxygen, the odk flag
suffices;
generate the documentation anyway. Otherwise it is always good to use
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:01:32 +0100
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/04/2012 04:35 PM, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:57:58 +0100
Stephan Bergmannsberg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/04/2012 03:58 PM, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
[...]
Doxygen won't
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 10:22:13 +0200
Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Alexander,
My understanding is that libgsf is a Gnome i/o abstraction library used
for reading/writing structured file formats, and it has several
extensions, one of which is the thumbnailer
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 12:08:42 +0200
Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have librsvg natively on MacOSX, and I already have gio, so I
don't understand why it isn't being recognised instead of requiring
libgsf, unless it is a compiler linking problem ??
So, if there is GIO
On Mon, 30 May 2011 14:08:41 -0600
Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
Browsing configure.in, I see three different binary options for various
aspects of Pyhon support:
--disable-python. Disable build of Python 2.x UNO API
--enable-ext-scripting-python. Enables support for scripts
On Mon, 30 May 2011 22:54:54 +0200
Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Hanno, *,
Hi Christian,
What build tools need python? The build system is perl, not python.
Translate-Toolkit is python.
http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/toolkit/index
Regards,
I made the attached patches to get rid of the 'ooo-services.rdb' file
and fix the disabled-python build. Though, now I get a general
configuration error. stderr shows following message:
Error: File
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:53:20 +0200
Andreas Becker atayoo...@googlemail.com wrote:
First of all, it has nothing to do with that patch.
You should perhaps update automake (my version is 1.11).
You are so right. automake 1.11 does just fine.
Now then, I got this error:
=
Building
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:58:29 +0200
Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
One of the arguments seems to point outside my chroot or wherever to a
bad path. How can I check the args?
First of all, just to verify, your PKGBUILD looks just fine.
So, how to check the args, see
Hi Andreas,
got around my problem by disabling translations.
Finally, I got it installed. Though, scp2 needs patching and Python
modules have even on Mac OS X .so endings stated here:
scp2/source/python/file_python.scp:303:// pyuno.so even on Mac OS X,
because it is a python module
Is
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:42:31 +0200
Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
... (make DESTDIR=... install is broken for me).
Hi all,
I would recommend my patch attached. For that one would need
to pass '--libdir=/usr/LIBDIR' to configure to behave. Otherwise it
installs to /LIBDIR. Improvements to
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:43:07 +0200
Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
I did some changes. I made the libreoffice dirname configurable by
--with-install-dirname option. Also I defined prefix, exec_prefix,
libdir values in Makefile.in.
The result is that the installation path is
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:35:47 +0200
Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
This has not happened when using plain beta1 source and using
make OODESTDIR=foo install.
The only thing changed there was OODESTDIR to DESTDIR.
So it should stay in the sandbox. Would you mind to pastebin
the log of the
Hi Andreas,
your patchset applies fine to 3.3.99.1. Though, configure fails with:
checking which python to use... external
checking for a Python interpreter with version = 2.2... none
configure: error: no suitable Python interpreter found
I test with python3.1 as only version installed.
#
Hi all,
would anyone of you know why there are two services.rdb created
in that makefile? And in the second one is mailmerge the only
component. Could we not simply merge mailmerge into the other
one?
Why I ask? The way it is now does a bit of a headache for a Python/PyUno
disabled build;
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:55:43 +
Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, that '/usr/lib' path is hard-coded in configure right now.
But currently only if pkg-config --variable=libdir x11 fails. I wonder
if just removing the surrounding 'if test $x_libraries... ' would be
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:45:49 +0100
Hanno Meyer-Thurow h@web.de wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:55:43 +
Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, that '/usr/lib' path is hard-coded in configure right now.
But currently only if pkg-config --variable=libdir x11 fails. I wonder
Well, this is just a resend of the first message, though, with proper
links to the patches.
1. Do not add compiler default include and library path: potentially build
against different version of system library than requested by the user
(i.e., /usr/local/lib vs /usr/lib).
Report:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:31:05 +
Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
Just for clarification, I do not want to add the sal-sandbox.dff hack but
rather a silly sandbox violation caused by officecfg makefile.mk.
*ah*, now I see, I was talking above a completely different patch of
Hi all,
next week I will merge the following Gentoo patches from the old build
repository
into master as long as there are no objections.
1. Do not add compiler default include and library path: potentially build
against different version of system library than requested by the user
(i.e.,
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:44:04 +
Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:03 +0100, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
1. Do not add compiler default include and library path: potentially build
against different version of system library than requested by the user
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:45:22 +0100
Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi Hanno,
Hi Jan,
hi Andreas,
Sorry for being unclear in the announcement mail. Indeed, the 'build'
repo is an exception, and the distro maintainers are free to commit
whatever they need for their own distros, you only
branch of libreoffice/ure
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/tree/patches/64bit/64bit-jdk-server-paths.diff
That would be great to be merged.
Regards,
HannoFrom cc3cff24234ca1f853f6d1e9149e30a12552dd90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hanno Meyer-Thurow h@web.de
Date: Fri, 11
Hi,
I just checked for my db version. I, too, use
[IP-] [ ] sys-libs/db-4.8.30:4.8
which works just fine. So I wonder what differs.
Regards,
Hanno
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:11:48 +0100
Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi Hanno,
Hi Kendy,
I have pushed that to master, and when cherry-picking to
libreoffice-3-3, I found out that Rene already partially updated it, so
I incorporated your changes there too - namely use WITH_LANG, and use
26 matches
Mail list logo
