ust plain 1-byte -> 2-bytes extension.
> Anyhow - on this topic:
>
> Any chance of SAL_UNUSED ? ;-) At worse, SAL_UNUSED_PARAM.
SAL_UNUSED_PARAM? And that's how the Writer codebase came around ... . Unlike
RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM(), this one is unlikely to be
rom performance point of
view.
I can't comment on other reasons why this might have been split though.
[*] Seriously, I can't find a thing. Is there actually something using the
library?
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
temState(), but also to make it more
visible that it is an out argument. The intuitive reading of "if(
set.HasItem( which, item ))" to me is "does 'set' have an item of
type 'which' that is 'item'?".
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.c
On Thursday 02 of February 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 11:26 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > I agree with all the points, but in Julien's defense, I remember
> > exactly this same approach was pushed in recently as a fix to the same
> > issue elsewhere.
>
should agree on what the recommended way is? I personally think
the simplest and most elegant solution is to go with 'it = container.erase(
it );" and move the "++it" out of for()'s parentheses to an else block of the
if() condition (oh well, ease of use
avoid most of the unneeded output and still, I assume, would do and be an
optimal default.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
hat, and is the least intrusive change.
>
> Can you please review for -3-5 and -3-5-0?
Pushed to 3-5.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
rocessComponentContext in code that does not thread the
> component context more locally).
How usual is the case that one does not want to pass
comphelper::getProcessComponentContext() to all these functions? Or in other
words, why not simply make it the default argument value?
--
Lub
ormat enough to be certain about the fix, but I
expect it is quite clear from the logic of the thing, so I've committed as
b5a73d4b2b283d3d1a57ac0f66b608998960a873 . Please review and backport.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice ma
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 04:40 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > I intend to put just a short note to the documentation in sal/log.hxx
> > pointing to this file (so that additions wouldn't trigger rebuilds), but
> > I'm not su
od with scripts, he'd be more than welcome to e.g. use them to
change writer's cryptic indentifiers to something that does not need
decyphering. Which would affect git blame as well, but in this case the huge
increase in readability of the code would be more than worth it. Tasks for
han's problem, but your changes (both the commit and
the attached patch) break the document from bnc#743331 (picture in the
upper-right corner).
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://l
irely a matter of taste and IMO it's not worth to affect git
blame by things like this.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
ebody sign-off and push to -3-5, please?
>
> I cherry-picked it to -3-5, but it would be good to have 2 more reviews
> to push it to -3-5-0 as well.
One.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.free
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > (and the filter-it-out suggestion is ridiculous, what if somebody really
> > explicitly also CC-ed me e.g. because it's urgent?).
>
> http://help.cselabs.umn.edu/email/procmail ;)
Cool! S
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> On 24/01/12 16:26, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > - it leaves less room for the actually important part of the subject when
> > browsing mail
> > - which gets expecially insane when forwarding mails futher or between
> >
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 12:04 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > if I wanted to get all those useless duplicates of replies to my
> > mails, I would have said so.
>
> This might be a controversial issue. While I too feel I don
On Wednesday 25 of January 2012, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lubos Lunak schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, khagaroth wrote:
> >> While at it, it would be nice to also set Reply-To:
> >> libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org.
> >
> > Oh
ke, last
decade) to have 'reply-to-mailing-list' and that solves the problem. And that
was a plural you, if I wanted to get all those useless duplicates of replies
to my mails, I would have said so.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
__
hat doesn't look very good to me. Does somebody know where a good place for
such a file would be?
Thanks.
PS: A good place meaning that people would actually be able to find it and use
it, which rules out the option of burying it in some random wiki page.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
__
iling lists
- it makes adding tags like [PUSHED] more cumbersome
- one would hope that by 2012 everybody interested in filtering mail can
actually do it based on the List-Id header, which has the additional benefit
of really filtering mails from the mailing list
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@su
On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 23/01/12 21:31, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Technically, I get in SwXDocumentSettings::_setSingleValue() first a
> > call with HANDLE_CURRENT_DATABASE_DATA_SOURCE and then with
> > HANDLE_CURRENT_DATABASE_COMMAND. They
-push-all-the-data-as-properties-one-by-one approach, so I wonder what
the common way of avoiding this problem is? Preferably something that's not
an ugly hack, excuse the naivety.
Thanks
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing li
t; custom document information.
>
> Please consider this patch for inclusion.
Pushed.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
broken to me to unconditionally move a table
forward just depending on whether there is something before it. Git blame
shows a CWS merge, so it is unhelpful.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
From 63e7d5a92a9580b1e04026657eb99bfef3480fde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Lubo=C5=A1=20Lu=C5=
On Friday 06 of January 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 06/01/12 17:35, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Friday 06 of January 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
> >> in the case of pdfimport, isn't there a potential licensing problem
> >> because it uses GPL-licensed xpdf/pop
g out we
have this filter that can handle it or by finding out we have this extension
that can handle it.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tuesday 03 of January 2012, Marcel Metz wrote:
> ---
> binfilter/inc/bf_starmath/smmod.hxx |2 ++
> binfilter/inc/bf_sw/shellres.hxx|2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Pushed all patches.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.l
but the
> patch also touches some of the mac specific code like
> fpicker/source/aqua/SalAquaFilePicker.mm so it would be maybe a good
> idea to test this patch.
Compiled for me too, so let's say the only way to check for problems is by
running into them :). Pus
On Wednesday 04 of January 2012, Gustavo Pacheco wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 (part XXII) for review.
>
> Part XXII
> modules
> jvmfwk, l10ntools, lingucomponent
Pushed, thanks.
--
Lubos L
On Wednesday 04 of January 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 04:15 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 of January 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> >> (One downside of doxygen appears to be that
> >> it does not generate an overview of all the non-class
not sure what you mean here - the overviews do include also global
non-namespaced objects, search
http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/cpp/ref/names/index.html for
e.g. 'typereg_writer_destroy'.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffi
hanks (and all the notes were correct).
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
;isEmpty() patches I've reviewed are
correct, I expect the rest will be as well, and by now you are the expert in
this field anyway :). You can still post for review other patches where you
won't be sure.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
.begin()); it !=
aFldNames.end(); ++it)
{
-pArray[i] = *aFldNames.GetObject(i);
+pArray[i] = **it;
^^^
+delete *it;
}
Fixed, pushed.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
The same like before.
Pushed.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
(i.e. addresses
remain the same), which does not seem to be the case, this is just an
optimization. The 16 looks a bit like a magic number anyway.
You also removed the check for m_pGlosArr being NULL in the code below:
SwGlossaries::~SwGlossaries()
{
- sal_uInt16 nCount = m_pGlosArr? m_
On Tuesday 03 of January 2012, Marcel Metz wrote:
> Hello lo-devs,
>
> this patch removes the unused (according to OpenGrok) GetIsoFallback
> function from the tools module.
Looks ok, pushed.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOf
lows a ctor to directly call another ctor, but otherwise
init() seems to be the only correct option.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Monday 02 of January 2012, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460
>
> Part XXVII
> Modules
> padmin, pyuno, rdbmaker, regexp, registry, rsc, sal
Pushed as well.
--
Lubos Lunak
On Sunday 01 of January 2012, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460
>
> Part XXVI
> Module
> package
Pushed.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
On Sunday 01 of January 2012, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460
>
> Part XXI
> Module
> oox
Pushed, thanks.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing l
bs-core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4
>&id=395c05c288116683ffb3bceb658f61694c042b28
>
> We need 2 more approvals for the 3-4-5 branch.
Makes sense.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
assumption. Your patch makes sense
> and I have pushed it to the 3-4 branch, see
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id
>=502ef71db74c3cdb1433c3402a0d93971dc47f1b
>
> We need two more approvals for the 3-4-5 branch.
Looks ok.
--
Lubos L
cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&i
>d=9dcc765e88bf23418ffbf66345e4eaa4c36005e4
Yes, it's correct.
> We need two more approvals for the 3-4-5 branch.
One.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
__
On Wednesday 28 of December 2011, Marcel Metz wrote:
> Hello lo-devs,
>
> There is never an instance of mpDateTable allocated and a lot of
> code is never executed because of that. This patch removes the
> unused code.
Pushed, thanks.
--
Lubos Lunak
it to the libreoffice-3-4 branch, see
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4
>&id=005f59ac32ce48397fa7df3b4f6586467c7f9bda
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4
>&id=09b32d79015b9e4fd933492b495b99ab1
ces, set the tab size
correctly or whatever it is your editor needs.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
alue mpGraphic, so that suggests it is possible to re-initialize the class
using this call. But then using this init() call first and later one of the
ones inherited from GraphicDescript will leave mpGraphic inconsistent.
Presumably the proper fix is to get rid of the init() calls and use directly
On Wednesday 14 of December 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi Lubos,
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:45:29PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > I find it mildly annoying that gbuild outputs "[ build CXX ]
> > starmath/source/types", without the .cxx extension, i.e. a no
On Thursday 08 of December 2011, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 of December 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 17:35 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > > So -gdwarf-4 looks like a sensible default to me. Even if not, I'm
> > > > going
On Thursday 15 of December 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 02:57 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > The "bar"<< "baz", which, at first glance, is nonsense. Code is not
> > only written, it is also read, and many more times.
>
> Still do
On Thursday 15 of December 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 07:56 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > But it might the moment you realize you're trading away things like
> >
> > SAL_INFO( "foo", 1<< 2 ) or SAL_INFO( "foo", &quo
27;, the app then will
crash as soon as it reaches the limit.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello,
I find it mildly annoying that gbuild outputs "[ build CXX ]
starmath/source/types", without the .cxx extension, i.e. a non-existent file.
Especially since other target types like LNK do output "[ build LNK ]
Library/libsmlo.so". Any objections to the attache
On Monday 12 of December 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 16:30 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > The format-based usage uses a printf-like function that, unlike printf,
> > is typesafe and extensible. If people would be interested, the function
> > itself cou
On Monday 12 of December 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 04:30 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > I'd like to propose changes to the SAL_INFO etc. family of the new
> > logging functions that would replace the somewhat strange usage
> >
> > SAL_INFO(&quo
On Monday 12 of December 2011, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Attached source code has a testing implementation of the format function and
> a simple logging macro.
In case somebody actually tries to build it :), the easiest way seems to be:
g++ -Wall -O2 -save-temps
a.cxx -DUNX -DLINUX -I$LODIR/
a: Did you know that despite being seemingly highly
optimized, with stuff like OUStringBuffer::makeStringAndClear() or the
obnoxious RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM macro, O(U)String* actually does some
rather pathetic things like ctors first checking if there's any memory to
free or allocat
ore/docnode/nodes.cxx does instantiate SwNode, so I really
don't know.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Wednesday 07 of December 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 17:35 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > > So -gdwarf-4 looks like a sensible default to me. Even if not, I'm
> > > going to use it (quick hack: modify your LO make script to add it to
> >
em? I don't know if/where
we have a suitable place.
The documents would be also usable for automated tests, but seeing the
discussion about subsequenttests right now it's probably not the right time
to try to figure it out.
--
Lubos Lunak
s, also errors. Tinderbox mails are already pretty difficult
to read as they are and anything that makes people less motivated to do more
than just glance at them is bad. Thanks for switching tinderbox to -s.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
Li
On Thursday 01 of December 2011, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 of November 2011, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > These options cause debuginfo for
> > most big types to be shared across compilation units, a huge size win.
> > This also makes gdb use less memory.
>
> I&
On Thursday 01 of December 2011, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:14:32PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 of November 2011, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >> First, one must consider the tradeoffs. I always use -g3 when building
> >> gdb, bec
ce any problems with -gdwarf-4.
So -gdwarf-4 looks like a sensible default to me. Even if not, I'm going to
use it (quick hack: modify your LO make script to add it to $CXXFLAGS).
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
increase object size compared to -ggdb2?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-April/010408.html
Short answer: yes.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.fr
$(filter s,$(MAKEFLAGS)),,VERBOSE=T) -P$(BUILD_NCPUS) $(2)
> -P$(GMAKE_PARALLELISM) gb_MAKETARGET=$(gb_MAKETARGET) $(eval
> gb_BuildplTarget_COMPLETEDTARGETS+=$(1))
> endef
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tuesday 29 of November 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Ah - but this is what I added:
>
> Window* Window::GetParentDialog() const
One 'const' missing (or one too much).
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice maili
it uses?). Moreover, in Qt-based land -Whadow
is (AFAICT) usually considered a nuisance rather than help (and this shows
why), so I expect nobody will even seriously look at it anyway, for a reason.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
call
> SmOoxmlImport::handleBorderBox(void)"
> (?handleBorderBox@SmOoxmlImport@@AAE?AVOUString@rtl@@XZ)
> c:/libreoffice/workdir/wntmsci12.pro/LinkTarget/Library/smlo.dll : fatal
> error LNK1120: 3 unresolved externals make[1]: ***
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
al data is split,
then the concatenation has to happen at some level.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Wednesday 23 of November 2011, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> I expect it would be even possible to achieve such single in-place call
> even for the LOG( "P is " << p << " and b is " << b ) case, or even do this
> for string+string operation, which would tu
On Wednesday 23 of November 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 14:56 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > And some of the arguments are rather weak as well, I can get you easy to
> > use and read, better to translate and similarly space efficient without
> >
On Tuesday 22 of November 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 18:26 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Since 3.4 at least, when run with KDE4 integration, LO kind of happens
> > to have a runtime dependency on a yet unreleased Qt version, otherwise LO
> > w
e does not
have SwNode as its first base class (and trying to change that goes horribly
wrong). But I myself wouldn't consider that a good reason for keeping the
serials.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing li
lso, string usage in LO is rather cumbersome as it is and in general it'd be
probably a good trade-off to waste a couple of bytes on each string operation
that doesn't need a whole line of code to express a trivial operation.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
_
On Tuesday 22 of November 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 05:17 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
...
> I did not commit it in order to stop any discussion. Sorry if it looked
> that way. Rather, as I did not get any totally disagreeing reactions, I
> thought it would be easier to
that is supposed to work.
What do you suggest to do about it?
PS: I've attached a backport of the Qt change to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40298 .
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
iant, perhaps they should
be simply rather fixed/improved
- WTH should we intentionally have two sets of one functionality again?
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
me to the right
places in the code? Thanks.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
d I don't really dare to just guess, as the 'return TRUE' part is a clear
evidence the function was written by somebody brain-damaged.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http:/
minute and write
something short. The same applies whenever you write something new of course.
Now that you know how, there's no real excuse.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
27;t say I understand the actual problem, but if you want to configure on
a system with unusual locations, there's $QT4INC and $QT4LIB.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
backwards
compatibility with KDE3 or not. The configure checks in the patch search for
KDE3/Qt3 names, so I would assume the answer is yes. If not, then at least
that part of the patch is definitely wrong.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
--- /home/llunak/build/src/libo/vcl/unx/kde/salnativewid
ch
OSL_ASSERT is really meant to assert and which is just a warning.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
ease (freeze is Dec 5th) quite
> easily.
The original mail rings a bell ...
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-September/017515.html .
And I don't remember any reply to my questions, and I don't see anything
changing since then,
wants this would
need to examine the makefiles it generates.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
his :)
Possibly 'help catch' and 'help commands' could make this easier/faster, but
I have not actually tried it.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
living Child(s) destroyed:
21SfxEmptySplitWin_Impl (window text: '')')
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
he pO->GetData() to something like
> po->data(), instead of &(*pO)[0] (and similar) used on many places...
That same would be allowed by
class bytes : public std::vector
{
public:
const sal_uInt8* data() const { return &front(); }
...
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
t.
It's going to take ages for it all to be translated manually and IMO the
translations can be occassionally useful, even if of questionable quality.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop
heck.
Even if ods does not officially store it, presumably you can have an
LO-specific field where LO could cache the value for faster reading anyway,
no?
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.o
On Wednesday 21 of September 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:55:44 +0200
>
> Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > You forgot Qt4/KDE4. LO does not use STL with it, so this is just to
> > show that it's not so trivial to check if there's a potential
>
bstractions, especially in a
non-optimized build.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
check for this automatically, so
the only way to find such a problem would presumably be getting a strange
crash.
But I'm not against, if not having STL debug enabled on Linux makes building
on Windows even more of a nightmare, then I guess we could live with that.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu..
good.
> i don't think it's a good idea that the Linux developers introduce such
> regressions
Agreed, but Linux developers getting mysterious crashes is not a very good
idea either, so it is a question if STL debug mode is worth it.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
__
i.documentfoundation.org/Development/Unit_Tests to
match the current status.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Saturday 10 of September 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Since there (AFAIR) haven't been any actual data presented in the
> > discussion
>
> here are some number for my linux buildbot.
Ccache hit statistics f
doubt ccache warrants
being enabled by default just like that.
> I don't do that in configure for the same reason we don't change
> CCACHE_DIR or the cache dir size.
> Using ccache if available is one thing... but trying to
> 'auto-magically' optimize ccache is
501 - 600 of 726 matches
Mail list logo
