Either way, this have to be addressed ASAP. I need the 3.6 series for
accessibility
tests with Freedom Scientific JAWS and others. The testing is related to
usage
scenarios for members of the Norwegian Association of the Blind and
Partially
Sighted, so it's important.
--
Olav Dahlum
PGP key ID
. More testing,
predictability, and fixing
bugs are required in order to minimize the ranting. Remember that users
seldom think the
changes we like are very interesting, as they really just want stability
and to continue their
work.
--
Olav Dahlum
PGP key ID: 0xA6BD1795
, so I wouldn't chuck
him out at his point.
--
Olav Dahlum
PGP key ID: 0xA6BD1795
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
On 15/02/12 18:29, Florian Reisinger wrote:
A second try, after sending this message just to Rainer - sorry for that
Am 15.02.2012 18:28, schrieb Florian Reisinger:
Am 15.02.2012 18:10, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld:
Petr Mladek schrieb:
What about having the following for the beta builds:
On 14/02/12 22:35, Cor Nouws wrote:
Pedro wrote (14-02-12 22:33)
is released and the About box says
LibreOffice 3.5.0rc3
IIRC, this is as usual: after the final RC no new builds are made, so no
strings are updated :-)
This should be fixed ASAP from a marketing point of view. It's
2012/2/14 Pedro pedl...@gmail.com
Olav Dahlum wrote
This should be fixed ASAP from a marketing point of view. It's all about
expectations, so renaming the tarball etc is just not good enough.
Leif did also receive a similar complaint earlier, so this should be
taken very seriously
On 15/12/11 17:03, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hi,
you can find a summery from my point of view concerning QA related
discussion of the Engineering Steering Committee on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/RBd/TSC_Call_Minutes
Best regards
Rainer
Will the Bugzilla Assistant allow
