?
Thomas Hackert wrote
Please let me know when you report it so that I can confirm it ;)
It is https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72218 now ... ;)
Confirmed, as you probably already were notified :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi Thomas
Thomas Hackert wrote
if I open the above
mentioned dialog, I can only see squares with lines instead of
pictures and lines from the sixth square for a couple of rows ... :(
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open Writer or Impress
2. Go to Format – Bullets and Numbering...
3. Look at
the time and energy to do it ... ;)
I did some searches in bugzilla and couldn't find any related reported.
No, I do not have the energy on a Sunday night :)
Please let me know when you report it so that I can confirm it ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi Christian, all
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
The TDF labeled ones will follow shortly, I need to tweak the build
scripts to work with multiple branches.
Excellent. I will wait for those then.
I think I will ignore the 4.3 branch for now (until 4.2.0 RC1 is out, at
least) and stick with 4.2
is 132Mb in size)
However the Master builds for TB#39 and TB#42 are 125Mb and 121Mb
respectively
What was removed? What are the goals of this builds? Using this build
instead of #47 allows to prove/test something?
Thanks,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
presets. If the check box doesn't show up on your system then it is
a bug :)
It does work correctly under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
Another Debian only bug? :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Greyed-out-Save-settings
?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Three-times-default-settings-in-Presentation-Minimizer-tp4085086p4085095.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice
for updates shows LibreOffice 4.1 is
up to date. What is the point in this? It just confuses users...
Why not LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 is up to date. or simply (as Mozilla does)
LibreOffice is up to date. ?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-long-before
to date. and
version 3.6.7.1 still reports LibreOffice 3.6 is up to date.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-long-before-a-released-build-is-notified-by-Update-tp4082780p4084885.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
the laptop with build 4.1.2.1 (which is the official RC1) now
reports that 4.1.3 is available. Could it be that RC checking has been fixed
in the 4.1 branch?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-long-before-a-released-build-is-notified-by-Update
Hi Thomas
Under Windows XP the icon themes do work and they are distinct from Tango
(Tango Testing shares many icons but you would notice the difference)
You should report the bug for Debian (at least)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
one should people select?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4084478.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
Ping! Any news?
Did anyone read
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-long-before-a-released-build-is-notified-by-Update-tp4082780p4083805.html
?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-long-before-a-released-build-is-notified-by-Update
me back to the question: which build should users download? Is
testing IA2 important or are there features in the builds from the other
TBs that are more crucial/urgent to test?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds
Hi Thomas
Bug confirmed with LO 4.2 Alpha under Windows XP. And since it doesn't occur
under LO 4.1 it is a regression.
Thomas Hackert wrote
P.S.: If someone finds a faster way to freeze, feel free to tell me
... ;)
You just need to open LO Calc and do steps 6 and 7 :)
Cheers,
Pedro
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70499
Thank *you* for your persistence ;)
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Moztrap-some-feedback-please-tp4083995p4084132.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
there are even differences from 4.1 to 4.2) and
after making changes and saving again as MS XML sometimes the file is
unreadable by MS Office.
I know that LO's recommended format is ODF but in the real world you can't
refuse MS XML documents.
Just my 2 cents.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context
is LibreOffice 4.1.2.1.
(already reported as a bug some time ago
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46354 )
Just my 2 cents on update checking under Windows ;)
Cheers.
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-long-before-a-released-build-is-notified
on the
server that wasn't updated? Is this still done manually by Kendy?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-long-before-a-released-build-is-notified-by-Update-tp4082780.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
or impossible?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-long-before-a-released-build-is-notified-by-Update-tp4082780p4082793.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice
Hi qubit
In this server you have ALL builds for ALL OSes since 3.3.0 Beta1 until
4.0.5 and 4.1.0 (i.e until August 15th 2013)
ftp://ftp.uni-muenster.de/pub/software/LibreOffice/testing/
Are these useful?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
or full installer). Is this deliberate?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4081948p4082028.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
for the relationship with the
community/users...
Otherwise, someone will have to actually read it :)
Personally I think it's good to have such a tool (in the Mozilla version
there is an optional field for email contact) but does LO/TDF have the
manpower?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message
not that geek,
when it comes to choosing the right component and the like, but I
prefer it over BSA ... ;)
I'm sorry to tell you this: you collaborate in the QA of an Open Source
project and therefore you are in the geek category :)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi Rob
Rob Snelders-2 wrote
Emails can be validated (in the same way your email client
immediately informs you that an address is not valid: it checks
with the target mail server)
I have always learned to turn that feature off. So you can't verify a
mail-address against the mailserver I
Rob Snelders-3 wrote
I think that a lot of hardcore users would be mad if you exclude them. I
wouldn't want that, as some of our developers are those users, I for
example wouldn't be able to work on the BSA anymore. So a big NO against
any such rule.
We are discussing about a simplified
bfoman wrote
I do not think that we should babysit bug reports - already there are a
lot of them in fdo, not mentioning other bug-trackers (novell, redhat), or
those on aoo issues system.
Yes, there are too many bugs in fdo. Both because the project has very
little QA people and also because
need to install separately is the offline help. Make sure
you get the file ending with helppack_pt.msi
However I don't know if there is an easy way to do a system wide deployment.
Hope this helps ;)
Cumprimentos,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Set
:)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Where-should-users-report-bugs-tp4081505p4081524.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
bfoman wrote
Input is fire and forget type of site, which helps to find out hot issues
and is triggered from within Firefox.
Interesting. Someone/something (word filter?) has to read it though :)
bfoman wrote
I can write that I do not want to work with anonymous bug reports while
triaging.
mariosv wrote
I have read about it in the Kohei Yoshida's Webspace:
Thank you for the link. It allowed me to figure out that the limitation is
not so much which formulas/functions it applies to but which GPUs it
detects...
My netPC based on the ION chipset does support CUDA and OpenCL but is
Hi Thomas
Thomas Hackert wrote
Maybe ... ;) What do others here think? Should I open a bugreport
for it?
This is the QA mailing list and the Q stands for Quality.
I think you should report it. It is wasted space and it looks bad.
My 2 cents ;)
Have a nice Sun day :)
Pedro
--
View
in Calc by making sure that the large
Calc refactorings did not introduce regressions.
I was referring to communication in general...
not yet ready for testing by QA... Interesting. Please do remember to post
on this mailing list when it's ready for QA...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message
will change the MIME type at some point...
The workaround is NOT to add attachments to the original post but add it in
the first comment.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-White-bar-at-the-bottom-of-Tools-Options-LibreOffice-Appearance
Hi Florian
I know that LO is Germany based but many of us do not understand German ;)
Your post is obviously related to a QA call on Nov 4th...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Florian-Reisinger-hat-Sie-zu-QA-Call-4-11-13
...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-White-bar-at-the-bottom-of-Tools-Options-LibreOffice-Appearance-tp4080642p4081012.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List
Hi all
Can anyone tell me if GPU calculation through OpenCL is already working in
the Master releases?
Is it enabled by default? If not, how is it enabled? In the Advanced
Enable Experimental Features?
What kind of operations is this expected to enhance? File loading?
Thanks,
Pedro
--
View
Hola Miguel Ángel
mariosv wrote
take a look in:
Menu/Tools/Options/LibreOffice calc/Formula - Detailed calculation
settings - Custom.
Thank you for the directions ;)
Can you (or anyone else) tell me which sorts of simple formula expressions
are affected by this setting?
--
View this
information, feel free
to ask :)
Works perfectly with LO 4.1.2.3 under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3.
It's probably a Linux (or Debian) only bug?
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Unreadable-words-on-Insert-Object-Chart-when-enabling
doing a parallel
install?
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-garbage-into-the-dev-builds-libreoffice-org-tp4074218p4080208.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List
previous minimal builds before the Optional Components allowed
the user to select LibreOfficeDev Program Modules... I'm just mentioning
this because it seems like a regression. If this won't affect the release
build installer then just forget I mentioned it ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message
needs to have a warning or run some system check?
It probably makes sense to also add a warning to the Wiki page on Parallel
install?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-garbage-into-the-dev-builds-libreoffice-org-tp4074218p4080246.html
Sent
://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox
Thank you for updating the table.
Could you please rename the TB to match the name in the table?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-garbage-into-the-dev-builds-libreoffice-org
sc/source/ui/vba/vbawindow.cxx | 83 +++--
sc/source/ui/vba/vbawindow.hxx |2
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit b9a4efe219b27adb09dbb56efb829b1e88f88ef7
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Mon Aug 13 17:05
/The-Document-Foundation-announces-LibreOffice-4-0-6-tp4079543.html
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-0-6-RC2-test-builds-available-tp4078636p4079627.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi Florian
Florian Reisinger wrote
PS: Too many builds here!
I guess you didn't read the original email by ape...
There AREN'T too many builds... Just too many EMPTY folders!
There AREN'T any builds NEWER than Oct 16th.
@ape, the builds from both tinderboxes (#39 and #47) work under
Hi Christian, Thorsten, all
Thank you for the information. However some of the Windows tinderboxes
(e.g. #6 and #39) were maintained by Suse employees... Maybe someone at TDF
should handle this?
I'm re-adding Thorsten in the loop (he is the admin for #42) just in case he
missed this...
BTW
Hi Jean-Baptiste
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote
It seems that something went wrong, the version 4.0.6.2 is no longer
available in http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/
Why do you think this is wrong? It was available for a few days and now a
new build is available. In fact the official
don't. Simple :)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-garbage-into-the-dev-builds-libreoffice-org-tp4074218p4079291.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
forgot to mention that you are referring to Tinderbox #39.
All other Windows tinderboxes for the Master branch are either empty or the
builds are even older than that.
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-builds-last-2013-10-16
that human resources are scarce and valuable (it just find it amusing
when PR starts bragging about the hundreds of devs) but if testing ahead
is important then TDF needs to make sure that the tinderboxes (at least
those owned by TDF) keep sharing valid binaries ;)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View
gladly take this task...)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-2-RC3-test-builds-available-tp4075690p4077036.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
feedback before I submit this to Bugzilla?
Thanks,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-2-RC3-test-builds-available-tp4075690p4076740.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
some more info ... ;) I am
not sure, what exactly your problem is ... :(
Sorry for the inconvenience
I hope the info provided now is better. Sorry for not making it clearer on
the first post ;)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
that the bug is present in LO 4.0.5.2 but not in 4.1.1.2 under
Windows XP using the Eng_US interface.
It seems it was fixed in the 4.1 branch (but not backported to the 4.0
branch) and you can close the bug as FIXED ;)
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
couldn't find that issue in Bugzilla, do you have any idea where I could
find that?
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-0-6-RC1-test-builds-available-tp4075995p4076384.html
Sent from the QA mailing list
Major regression found in 4.1.2.3 (I haven't teste 4.1.2.1 or 4.1.2.2 but it
is a regression from 4.1.1.2)
Reported here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70029
--
View this message in context:
Notice the half button in front of Similarity.
But I just noticed that two options have been removed since version 4.1.1.2:
Match character width and Sounds like (Japanese) which also had an
half button. Maybe these functions weren't used? Or is this a regression?
Pedro
--
View this message
TinderBox: Win-x86@6-debug, Branch:master, Time: 2013-09-03_14:36:22 which
is the latest Master version available for Windows XP)
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Doubled-Help-and-Close-in-Find-Replace-window-tp4075693p4075719.html
Sent
?) cases people *don't need* styles because they are never
going to change any formatting and the documents aren't complex enough to
need more than Default and Default+Bold :)
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-ux-advise-some-thoughts-on-the-Sidebar
mariosv wrote
There you can create a new style based on the current format, and the type
of style depends on what type you have selected: paragraph, character or
page.
But that is not the same. First, you need to *manually* create the new style
(and give it a name) while what MS Word does is
going to drop support for XP before Microsoft? Are the major changes being
carried out (like OpenCL) incompatible with Windows XP?
ape wrote
Windows XP users have a rest from the tests.
Yep. No problem ;)
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Microsoft
compilation on many different
build configurations after all.
Thank you for the clarification. Looking forward to new builds that work
under XP ;)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Microsoft-Installer-Error-1937-with-TB-39-Windows-builds
Michael Stahl-2 wrote
where do you get the idea that support for XP would be dropped from
release builds now? clearly the problem is just a badly configured
tinderbox, perhaps it has the non-updated release VS 2012 installed that
only has the 8.0 sdk.
Let's see: in August there were 3
V Stuart Foote wrote
The same downloads will install on Wnidows 8 and on Windows 7 Enterprise
sp1 64-bit system. But not on Windows XP where I get the same Error 1937
for same component.
So far it is just on one system for me. But is anyone else having this
issue? Ideas about what could
, obviously)
My point here is: if GPG verification does not guarantee file integrity can
TDF provide a Checksum (SHA1 or MD5) with the Pre-release files?
Thanks,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-2-RC2-test-builds-available
Hi Jean-Francois
Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote
Yes, for sure. But changing a style is extensive: the changes apply
throughout the document, whereas a local format is, well, local.
IOW, changing a style is worth the few extra clicks, if any and setting
direct formatting is actually requiring
the Paragraph and at least 5
mouse clicks (assuming you know where Styles are) ;)
BTW I just added an Enhancement Request so that Sidebar is set per
Module/Program
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69534
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
a month ago but
nobody bothered to answer... I hope someone answers to you...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-garbage-into-the-dev-builds-libreoffice-org-tp4074218p4074332.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi ape
I believe it must be related to the fact that many of the tinderboxes (e.g.
Tinderbox #6, the only one producing binaries for all Windows versions) were
run by Suse staff and Suse has dropped LO development
(https://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2013-09-03-collabora.html)
See list of
in Windows XP) so it must be doing something right :)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Why-no-daily-master-builds-tp4073881p4073919.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
Actually there are two portable versions.
The one suggested by Christian and X-LibreOffice from winPenPack.
You can get the latest version from
http://www.winpenpack.com/en/download.php?view.1354
or choose any specific version from
of place (if this was a Forum it would already have been moved ;) )
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/is-there-a-portable-version-of-libre-office-for-win-7-tp4072807p4072877.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Update-not-working-as-expected-tp4072550.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http
://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-ESC-call-td4072185.html
Which makes sense for 4.1.1 which was officially released 2 days ago but
4.1.0 final was released in July 25th...
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Update-not-working-as-expected
://www.winpenpack.com/en/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?57347
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-QA-Meeting-Minutes-2013-08-23-tp4071347p4072034.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
is always created even if the user performs a Custom install
and deliberately deselects that option. See
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65102
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-1-RC2-test-builds-available
?
Cheers;
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-1-RC2-test-builds-available-tp4071184p4071237.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice
Hi Kendy, Thorsten, all
Pedro wrote
The debug master build from the 13th (Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 73c02c20b19702dbe662fe0d80601049f015d8ac
TinderBox: Win-x86@6-debug, Branch:master, Time: 2013-08-13_21:26:14)
worked correctly so it won't help in solving the problems that were
there is a new one.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070921.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Thorsten Behrens wrote
* Pending Action Items:
+ upgrade 3.6 users to 4.0.5 once that is out (Thorsten/Kendy)
Please make sure that you check OS version first.
See related bug report
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65128
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65129
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Minutes-of-the-ESC-call-2013-08-15-tp4070282p4070994.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List
section of
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/stable/4.1.0/win/x86/LibreOffice_4.1.0_Win_x86.msi.mirrorlist
Or maybe on a separate file?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070577.html
Sent
should be removed since they are
not producing any master builds.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070620.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi Kendy, all
For some odd reason this message by ape hasn't been accepted.
I can confirm that build
master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from
tinderbox 39 fails to run on Windows XP x86 SP3 en_US because it misses some
MSVC dlls.
I can also confirm that the build
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
The tag libreoffice-4.0.5.2 (AKA 4.0.5 RC2) has been created. This is
the last scheduled RC.
This message was created on the 13th but files are already being uploaded
for RC2 and they are from the 14th, a little more than 24 hours later... I
hope all is ok because
Hi Jochen, all
I think this is a GREAT idea!
Jochen wrote
2) What benefits?
IMO the main advantage would be to remove another one or two layers of
obstacles for the user
1) Instead of having to select the project from a long list where
LibreOffice is somewhere in the middle
on the Dev list ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4069800.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Hi all
Two questions:
1) Tinderbox 6 stopped producing non-debug Windows daily builds for Master
branch. Is this deliberate?
2) There are 43 registered tinderboxes
(https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox) . Isn't it
possible that at least one of these uploads Windows daily
Andras Timar-3 wrote
It is in the review queue for 4.1.0:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/4738/
Excellent! But it would make sense to let people know about that in
Bugzilla?
In Bugzilla you only get Whiteboard: BSA target:4.2.0 target:4.1.1
In any case, that was an example. I meant this
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66420)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-crash-message-tp4064175.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
-unused-parameters.patch | 31
vigra/vigra1.6.0.patch | 1453 ++
7 files changed, 1487 insertions(+), 1761 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit d5a3cf938907eb9ab61044810d984c73452eb200
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Wed Sep 19 22:31:29 2012
I fixed a formatting error on the wiki page but it is still missing a link to
the Top priority item.
Hopefully this message is not ignored as well...
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Triage-Contest-tp4062244p4063045.html
Sent from the QA
,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Triage-Contest-tp4062244p4062249.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa
Update:
Pedro wrote
Reported new bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65545
Fixed in Version: 4.1.0.0.beta2+
Build ID: 5f58b80f7355f5947635d70b54b3e87a7421d8f
TinderBox: Win-x86_9-Voreppe, Branch:libreoffice-4-1, Time:
2013-06-15_06:47:45
The other two bugs persist.
--
View
Another interesting reading
http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2013/06/13/wasted-time/
This time about the new sidebar (and more, obviously)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338p4061428.html
Sent from the QA mailing list
with the Persona which is still an
unfinished job IMO)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338p4061530.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
Hi Enervation
Enervation wrote
I reported a bug, which is located at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65571
However, it is marked as NEW even though no one triaged it. Can someone
resolve this?
This is the default now. Bugs are initially marked as NEW. If additional
Hi Joel
jmadero wrote
This is a general problem that I think we shoudl just talk a bit about. If
we confirm a bug on 4.1 but it's fixed in 4.2 master - what status is
appropriate? Usually WFM is good but it's hard to tell a user so it'll be
broken for the foreseeable future but by 4.2
Hi all QAers
A very interesting reading
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2013/06/the-power-of-brand-and-the-power-of-product-part-2.html
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive
701 - 800 of 1079 matches
Mail list logo
