First off, thanks to everyone who tried to help me with my strange
cross compilation endeavor. I am happy to say that I finally got it
working. Although I cannot post proper patches to fix the cross
issues, still I would like to provide a starting point, in case
someone else wants to clean this
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:50:42PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Forgot git fetch --tags?
I did 'git remote update origin', and I thought that includes tags.
Now I see. The tag 'libreoffice-4.4.3.2' is not the branch called
Dear list,
It appears that LO Fresh 4.4.3 is not tagged in git.
git tag | grep libreoffice-4
...
libreoffice-4.4.0.1
libreoffice-4.4.0.2
libreoffice-4.4.0.3
libreoffice-4.4.1.1
libreoffice-4.4.1.2
libreoffice-4.4.2.1
git branch -a | grep libreoffice-4
...
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:57:38PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 08.05.2015 16:53, Miklos Vajna wrote:
In any case:
if test $cross_compiling != yes; then
libo_CHECK_SYSTEM_MODULE([cppunit],[CPPUNIT],[cppunit = 1.12.0])
fi
in configure.ac where cppunit is disabled in case of
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Forgot git fetch --tags?
I did 'git remote update origin', and I thought that includes tags.
Hm.
Thanks,
Richard
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 06:41:06AM +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Richard Cochran
richardcoch...@gmail.com wrote:
I specifically did 'make build' in order to avoid the tests, but the
build system compiles the tests anyhow.
The 'build' target includes tests
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
Thanks, that is very useful to know.
Actually, that target fails in the same way as 'build' does:
In file included from
/mnt/storage/git/libreoffice/sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:28:0:
/mnt/storage/git/libreoffice/include
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
What's your cross-compilation target?
x86_64
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html says that the
Android and iOS cross-compilation targets work fine (those columns are
green), as far as I see.
That doesn't surprise
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 08:07:19PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Well, we have tinderbox slaves that cross-compile for Android and iOS
constantly, so it can't be totally broken.
Those only work because the makefiles are full of special hacks for
those two targets. For example:
find external
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 02:31:16PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
At the very least, you would need to be consistent about passing
--host and --build to the externals:
Cross-compilation support for the bundled projects was added to these
that needed to be cross-compiled. Doing it for all of
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 06:59:47PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I think you missed the meaning of host in GNU autoconf terminology;) (np,
I confuse those constantly myself, too, unless I am ver careful)
Yes, the gnu terminology is confusing to me, too.
But no, this time I am not confused! Both
Dear list,
I am trying to build Version 4.4.0.3 with a -j30 parallel build, but I
am running into this error.
In file included from
/git/libreoffice/sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:28:0:
/git/libreoffice/include/cppunittester/protectorfactory.hxx:24:31: fatal
error:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:48:53PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:12:45PM +0200, Richard Cochran
richardcoch...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't I just force cppunit to build manually beforehand?
make cppunit.all
Tried that already, too. Here is what I got
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:55:35PM +0200, Richard Cochran
richardcoch...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, it is somehow related to the cross compile configuration. The
'make cppunit.all' works as expected with a native build.
Isn't
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:31:39PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
I should probably add that I am trying to cross compile LO (I know, I
know, don't ask why), and it is clear that building cross is not fully
implemented, but in this case I think it should still work.
Ok, it is somehow related
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:08:23PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/08/2015 10:45 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
1. Where is the dependency from sal-cppunit specified?
in sal/Executable_cppunittester.mk:
$(eval $(call gb_Executable_use_externals,cppunittester,\
boost_headers
16 matches
Mail list logo
