Hi Fridrich,
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 16:43 -0700, Pedro wrote:
So - Fridrich is going to do a re-spin. The (only) change (in a
nutshell) is to delete the cairocanvas.uno.dll from the program/
directory - so you can even test it before it goes live.
...
I think this was not cherry-picked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/04/12 16:30, Michael Meeks wrote:
I think this was not cherry-picked or whatever you call it to
master.
Bother ! :-)
The problem is that we disabled it in the release build configuration
file. If the tinderbox is buidling without using the
Hi Pedro,
thanks for noticing ... I added Michael and Fridrich to cc.
Pedro wrote (22-04-12 01:43)
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
Sure :-) luckily it is a really trivial bug to fix - it looks (to me)
like the same bug as bug#45584 - Thorsten: dudie - you fixed only 1/2 a
blocker bug symptom (ie.
Hi Petr, all
I'm glad to announce that the version number in the binary files now matches
the About dialog information under Windows!!!
This has been committed both to the 3.5 and 3.6 branch so it will be
available in the next RC (and Beta).
I have confirmed this with a daily build from the 3.5
Pedro píše v Po 02. 04. 2012 v 07:41 -0700:
Petr Mladek wrote
Why could it cause bad image? IMHO, it was bug on the Secunia side and
it is fixed now. We used this version scheme also for LO-3.4 and nobody
complained.
A bug on the Secunia side that LO version 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 are
Hi Petr, all
Petr Mladek wrote
Hmm, where do you see the version 3.5.0 and 3.4.602? I can't find it
anywhere. I checked name of the installer, about dialog and output from
libreoffice --version. So, I am confused.
In the file properties of any exe file under Windows
Pedro Lino píše v Čt 29. 03. 2012 v 19:06 +0100:
Hi all,
Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the
secunia
reports problem)
I think Secunia has already fixed the numbering so that the warning it
gone for version 3.5.1.
But the Version
Petr Mladek wrote
Why could it cause bad image? IMHO, it was bug on the Secunia side and
it is fixed now. We used this version scheme also for LO-3.4 and nobody
complained.
A bug on the Secunia side that LO version 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 are named 3.5.0? I
have to disagree...
As I mentioned in
Hi Michael, all
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
Since each dictionary is an Extension and extensions are checked at load
time, having dozens of un-needed dictionaries loaded not only makes first
load take ages but surely increases memory usage ? (I haven't tested this
but
I can tell for sure that
Hi Tor, all
Tor Lillqvist-2 wrote
My *personal* fear is that if we start doing these kinds of
suggestions, we will get into nasty nationalistic arguments...
We here in Freedonia certainly don't need any Sylvanian dictionary;
we will never forget how they destroyed our Holy Bicycle of
Filter Flat XML is set, if I choose Sample Filters. But the item Sample
Filters makes it so that MSI can not finish the job in my OS
(Windows_7_HP_32-bit; Windows_XP_64-bit).
This item is called Sample Filters. It seems to me, the word Sample is
synonymous with the word Example. Is the Simple
This item is called Sample Filters. It seems to me, the word Sample is
synonymous with the word Example. Is the Simple Filters correct?
The current name of the item doesn't really make much sense. If
sample means that the filters in question are intended to be
representative samples of source
Now I can DOCX files with formulas of Word-2003 and Word-2010 save as ODT
files across FODT filter only. I used Sample.. at all times. But I can
not install it normal, when the LibreOffice-3.5.2rc2_win-x86.msi was used.
The question sample - simple is not relevant when Flat XML filter is
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 10:32 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
The current name of the item doesn't really make much sense. If
sample means that the filters in question are intended to be
representative samples of source code for people writing new filters,
why does that have to show up in the
Le 29/03/12 07:28, Pedro a écrit :
Hi,
FlatXML is not installed by default, was it ever?
On Mac, all of the filters are installed as default...
Alex
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
It is installed with the version that you mention. Look for OpenDocument
Text (Flat XML) format.
The xslt filters are installed by default now. However, if you are
upgrading your LibreOffice, the installer checks what options were
chosen the previous time, so if you did not have your XSLT filters
Hi *,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Fridrich Strba
fridrich.st...@graduateinstitute.ch wrote:
for the upcoming new version 3.5.2, the RC2 builds now start to be
available on pre-releases.
Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the secunia
reports problem)
Hi Christian
Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the secunia
reports problem)
http://ask.libreoffice.org/question/1459/secunia-psi-reports-insecure
also on the mailinglists)
i.e. version info of soffice.exe, not the one in the about dialog.
I didn't check that and now I
Sorry, I am ashamed. It was my mistake. I think that the reason for failure
the MS installer was to change the registration of components
LibreOffice-3.5.2rc1.
Parameter:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\The Document
Foundation\LibreOffice\3.5\Capabilities\FileAssociations]
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
Personally, I think the ability to save 30k of stripped install size is
not really that valuable - so I'd want it to be bundled unconditionally
really if possible.
I agree that saving 30k in a 200Mb+ install is absurd.
On a opposite trend it would be great if
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 07:47 -0700, Pedro wrote:
On a opposite trend it would be great if the installer ASKED which
dictionaries should be installed (like Abiword' installer does), while
suggesting the most obvious (based on locale)
Ho hum :-)
Since each dictionary is an
Hi all,
Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the secunia
reports problem)
I think Secunia has already fixed the numbering so that the warning it gone
for version 3.5.1.
But the Version number in the file Properties for 3.5.2rc2 is now 3.5.0.202
instead of 3.5.2.2
Unless
Pedro wrote (29-03-12 01:13)
If Hardware Acceleration is not important then it's okay to do that. But it
must be, otherwise it wouldn't be activated by default, right?
I've really no idea what positive thing it should bring :-)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 15:30 -0700, Pedro wrote:
I can't believe that 3.5.2 is going to be released with Slideshow completely
ruined for all Windows users...
:-) lets not conclude that. The purpose of the RC's is to find horrible
bugs that havn't been noticed yet.
This is a regression
Hi *,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Fridrich Strba
fridrich.st...@graduateinstitute.ch wrote:
for the upcoming new version 3.5.2, the RC2 builds now start to be
available on pre-releases.
Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the secunia
reports problem)
Hi all,
Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the secunia
reports problem)
I think Secunia has already fixed the numbering so that the warning it gone
for version 3.5.1.
But the Version number in the file Properties for 3.5.2rc2 is now 3.5.0.202
instead of 3.5.2.2
Unless
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 3.5.2, the RC2 builds now start to be
available on pre-releases. This build is slated to be second release
candidate build on the way towards 3.5.2, please refer to our release
plan timings here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
*Attention! A blocking error Writer (LibreOffice 3.5.2.2; build_ID
281b639-6baa1d3-ef66a77-d866f25-f36d45f; Windows_OS):
File menu, point Save as: format FlatXML (*. fodt) is not in the list
of available formats.*
--
View this message in context:
ape wrote
*Attention! A blocking error Writer (LibreOffice 3.5.2.2; build_ID
281b639-6baa1d3-ef66a77-d866f25-f36d45f; Windows_OS):
File menu, point Save as: format FlatXML (*. fodt) is not in the list
of available formats.*
This is not really a Development question. It would have been
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 3.5.2, the RC2 builds now start to be
available on pre-releases. This build is slated to be second release
candidate build on the way towards 3.5.2, please refer to our release
plan timings here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
Pedro wrote (29-03-12 00:30)
Doesn't anybody care about the bad image this projects?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46901
A simple patch to turn hardware acceleration off by default wouldn't
have be to hard ?
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
31 matches
Mail list logo
