https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Hossein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||reviewed:2023
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #12 from jan iversen ---
Please be aware, that this easyhack is considered an important but large scale
cosmetic change as described in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|ToBeReviewed|
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:4.4.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:4.4.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #7 from Fernando Montes fernandomonte...@me.com ---
Well i am going to try to do what is left of this. Hopefully i can get ride of
both headers. Though i doubt getting rid of them will improve performance by
much.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #7 from Fernando Montes fernandomonte...@me.com ---
Well i am going to try to do what is left of this. Hopefully i can get ride of
both headers. Though i doubt getting rid of them will improve performance by
much.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #8 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
What made you think this bug has anything to do with performance?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #9 from Fernando Montes fernandomonte...@me.com ---
I don't know. I don't really understand what the bug really is. I understand
its about types conflicting with each other. But much like you said I can't
think of a clear way
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #9 from Fernando Montes fernandomonte...@me.com ---
I don't know. I don't really understand what the bug really is. I understand
its about types conflicting with each other. But much like you said I can't
think of a clear way
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #8 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
What made you think this bug has anything to do with performance?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #4 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
Forgot the quartz/hide-osl-timevalue.h, would be something like this. (But the
above was just one test approach, not sure at all that it is sane.)
#define TimeValue OslTimeValue
#include
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #6 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
Or we could just say that having premac.h/postmac.h is not that bad after all
and close this bug as WONTFIX. After all, the above approach at least is hardly
any cleaner...
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #4 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
Forgot the quartz/hide-osl-timevalue.h, would be something like this. (But the
above was just one test approach, not sure at all that it is sane.)
#define TimeValue OslTimeValue
#include
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #6 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
Or we could just say that having premac.h/postmac.h is not that bad after all
and close this bug as WONTFIX. After all, the above approach at least is hardly
any cleaner...
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #3 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
I guess handling TimeValue will be problematic here, as it is defined in a
stable API header, osl/time.h.
OK to break API (and ABI?) by renaming TimeValue there to OslTimeValue?
Or is something
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #3 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
I guess handling TimeValue will be problematic here, as it is defined in a
stable API header, osl/time.h.
OK to break API (and ABI?) by renaming TimeValue there to OslTimeValue?
Or is something
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|EasyHack
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #2 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Tor Lillqvist committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|EasyHack
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
--- Comment #2 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Tor Lillqvist committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||EasyHack
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82579
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||EasyHack
26 matches
Mail list logo