[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #29 from Chris Sherlock --- Sorry, I'm literally still learning how to develop on OS X :( I'm happy to look into it, but not sure how long it will take me to work this out... I've been a bit ill

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #29 from Chris Sherlock --- Sorry, I'm literally still learning how to develop on OS X :( I'm happy to look into it, but not sure how long it will take me to work this out... I've been a bit ill

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #26 from Sierk Bornemann --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #7) > 3. Have one download which includes all languages, like every other Mac app +1 (!) (In reply to steve -_- from comment #16) > Raising

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #26 from Sierk Bornemann --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #7) > 3. Have one download which includes all languages, like every other Mac app +1 (!) (In reply to steve -_- from comment #16) > Raising

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Sierk Bornemann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||42082 -- You

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Sierk Bornemann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||42082 -- You

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #28 from barefootguru --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #27) > @Chris, want to be a hero to your fellow OS X users? ;-) > > See Thorsten's code tip in comment 8 Unless the AppleScript

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #28 from barefootguru --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #27) > @Chris, want to be a hero to your fellow OS X users? ;-) > > See Thorsten's code tip in comment 8 Unless the AppleScript

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #25 from barefootguru --- Thanks Frank, had forgotten you needed to right-click when installing language pack. Note you *can* run LO if you immediately install a language pack, but it requires

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #25 from barefootguru --- Thanks Frank, had forgotten you needed to right-click when installing language pack. Note you *can* run LO if you immediately install a language pack, but it requires

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|high|medium

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|high|medium

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #18 from barefootguru --- While I don't have any stats on the number of people affected by this, I think the current system is unacceptable and user hostile: - you shouldn't have to download 2 things

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #18 from barefootguru --- While I don't have any stats on the number of people affected by this, I think the current system is unacceptable and user hostile: - you shouldn't have to download 2 things

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #20 from Frank Fuchs --- Stuart: I beg to differ as a really long time StarOffice/OOo/LO user - and MAC user since 3 years: The problem is even worse than barefootguru described: Because the language

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #20 from Frank Fuchs --- Stuart: I beg to differ as a really long time StarOffice/OOo/LO user - and MAC user since 3 years: The problem is even worse than barefootguru described: Because the language

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #22 from Frank Fuchs --- Tor: that can't be bypassed. Mac OSX simply reports this app as "broken". You do not get a prompt where you could choose to accept running an unsigned app. -- You are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #22 from Frank Fuchs --- Tor: that can't be bypassed. Mac OSX simply reports this app as "broken". You do not get a prompt where you could choose to accept running an unsigned app. -- You are

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #23 from Tor Lillqvist --- Not even right-click and "Open"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #21 from Tor Lillqvist --- But if the user has to know how to bypass Gatekeeper when running a langpack installer, can't she then also bypass Gatekeeper when running LibreOffice that has been "broken" by the

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #21 from Tor Lillqvist --- But if the user has to know how to bypass Gatekeeper when running a langpack installer, can't she then also bypass Gatekeeper when running LibreOffice that has been "broken" by the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #24 from Frank Fuchs --- Nope. If you install a language pack before running a freshly installed LO at least once, all you can do is move the installed LO app to the trash. Afterwards, a new install is

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #24 from Frank Fuchs --- Nope. If you install a language pack before running a freshly installed LO at least once, all you can do is move the installed LO app to the trash. Afterwards, a new install is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #23 from Tor Lillqvist --- Not even right-click and "Open"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list

[Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #19 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #18) > LO needs a single installer or drag-and-drop install, like almost every > other Mac app. > Hence this Installation/UX issue

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OSX unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #19 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #18) > LO needs a single installer or drag-and-drop install, like almost every > other Mac app. > Hence this Installation/UX issue