Bjoern Michaelsen píše v St 21. 12. 2011 v 21:31 +0100:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:34:26PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Note that I used the correct version 3.4.99.1 for this beta. We use
(3.3.99.X also for 3.4 betas). I am sorry that I used 3.5.0.0 for
beta0. The 3.5.0.x version are reserved
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:34:26PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Note that I used the correct version 3.4.99.1 for this beta. We use
(3.3.99.X also for 3.4 betas). I am sorry that I used 3.5.0.0 for
beta0. The 3.5.0.x version are reserved for release candidates.
Can we tag the beta0 as 3.4.99.0 in
2011/12/14 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de:
any suggestions welcome.
the only difference to beta0 is the changed internal libvisio src bump.
tried autoconf/autoreconf and make -j1 install without luck :(
-Andy
It is not failure during build, but during install, so configure and
make can
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:12:33PM +0100, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de
wrote:
Are you sure the new tarballs are fixed? I've tried the new .xz ones and
I'm still getting the same error.
I tried to build these:
$ sha1sum *.bz2
b116c7dade3d0fb9bf73362e728dbb1b04068acb
Andreas Radke píše v Út 13. 12. 2011 v 18:12 +0100:
Am Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:30:01 +0100
schrieb Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz:
Andreas Radke píše v Út 13. 12. 2011 v 05:14 +0100:
I'm running into this new build issue:
Sigh, I have created the source tarballs from master instead of the
Am Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:59:57 +0100
schrieb Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz:
Well, Rene pointed out that there is outdated configure stuff. It
seems that the script lo-pack-lources did not run autoreconf. You
might try to run it to refresh the files.
Tomas saw something similar on Gentoo as well.
Andreas Radke píše v Út 13. 12. 2011 v 05:14 +0100:
I'm running into this new build issue:
Sigh, I have created the source tarballs from master instead of the
libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag.
Could you please dowload the updated tarballs from
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/ and try
Am Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:30:01 +0100
schrieb Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz:
Andreas Radke píše v Út 13. 12. 2011 v 05:14 +0100:
I'm running into this new build issue:
Sigh, I have created the source tarballs from master instead of the
libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag.
Could you please dowload the
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag for 3.5.0-beta1 release.
The corresponding official builds will be available within 4 days or so.
It was delayed by few days because there were several build problems
caused by the hectic atmosphere around the feature freeze. Also we
did
At 12:34pm -0500 Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Petr Mladek wrote:
Note that I used the correct version 3.4.99.1 for this beta. We use
(3.3.99.X also for 3.4 betas). I am sorry that I used 3.5.0.0 for
beta0. The 3.5.0.x version are reserved for release candidates.
./g fetch --tags
./g checkout -b
Kevin Hunter píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 12:52 -0500:
At 12:34pm -0500 Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Petr Mladek wrote:
Note that I used the correct version 3.4.99.1 for this beta. We use
(3.3.99.X also for 3.4 betas). I am sorry that I used 3.5.0.0 for
beta0. The 3.5.0.x version are reserved for release
At 1:24pm -0500 Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Petr Mladek wrote:
Looks good. Please, also make sure that the other repositories are
on this branch. I do the following
./g branch | grep \*
:-) They are; no worries/ But good eye for git vs ./g!
Kevin
___
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag for 3.5.0-beta1 release.
The corresponding official builds will be available within 4 days or so.
Mac OSX x86 build uploading now at
I'm running into this new build issue:
[ build ALL ] top level modules: bootstrap src.downloaded ooo
[ build ALL ] loaded modules: ooo
LibreOffice build successfully finished.
To install, issue: make install
Developers might prefer this way: make dev-install -o build
To run smoketest, issue:
14 matches
Mail list logo
