Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

2011-11-23 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 17:52 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: See also http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2c46cde2edf25e8c9ae6f591b52a6b7c086fe166 for another place where support for C++11 is used. That's just a little workbench program that I stuck together to (somewhat

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

2011-11-23 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Lionel, On 2011-11-22 at 17:52 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: Kendy, would you consider having your MinGW tinderbox compile with -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x? That would ensure coverage of Windows-only code. I tried, but there were several places that were broken. After I found out that

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

2011-11-22 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Attached patch solves (according to user report on master daily build) fdo#36555, a severity critical bug which keeps users from connecting to ADO / OLE DB datasources. In particular, it keeps user from connecting to MS Access (.mdb) files in the most natural way; that is, by creating a new ODB

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

2011-11-22 Thread julien2412
Hello Lionel, Like I said in the tracker sorry for all this mess :-( Thank you for having solved this bug. Do you know if there's a way to detect cases like this one ? Julien. -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

2011-11-22 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 07:23:48AM -0800, julien2412 wrote: Like I said in the tracker sorry for all this mess :-( Thank you for having solved this bug. Do you know if there's a way to detect cases like this one ? Compile with gcc -std=c++0x or gcc -std=gnu++0x or (since my commit