On Sep 1, 2011, at 2:19 AM, Mohammad Elahi wrote:
Changed function lcl_formatPersianWord to be more generic, and added support
for some more numbering types:
English word: one, two, three, ...
English cardinal: first, second, third, ...
English cardinal semi-word: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, ...
Persian
Hi Stephan
First, I think extending this from Persian to English already shows the
biggest flaw of this approach: Do you want to extend in in this way for all
languages supported by LibO?
Yes, I was trying to make it more generic so can be used by more languages.
But maybe I should not,
I
On Sep 1, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Mohammad Elahi wrote:
Here, however, someone doing localization would need to add new constants to
NumberingType.idl and would need to add code to defaultnumberingprovider.cxx.
That does not feel right.
OK, I'm just started to work with libreoffice code ;) Just
Hi,
On Thursday, 2011-09-01 09:35:09 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
First, I think extending this from Persian to English already shows
the biggest flaw of this approach: Do you want to extend in in this
way for all languages supported by LibO? I would consider such
extension to additional
Hi Eike
String resources wouldn't be sufficient as different locales have
different rules for how to form a number string, especially when it
comes to ordinals. However, this looks more like spell-out than level
numbering and as such misses the point of the numbering provider. If we
wanted to
On Sep 1, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Thursday, 2011-09-01 09:35:09 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
First, I think extending this from Persian to English already shows
the biggest flaw of this approach: Do you want to extend in in this
way for all languages supported by LibO? I
Hi Mohammad,
On Thursday, 2011-09-01 16:04:53 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote:
However, this looks more like spell-out than level
numbering and as such misses the point of the numbering provider. If we
wanted to implement spell-out I'd rather go for ICU's methods than
implementing yet
Hi Eike
I thought the persian word numbers were meant to be used in numbering,
isn't that the case?
Well, I wanted to use it for a few page numbers in start of my document.
Instead of
roman numbers which is customary in some English books.
Please don't confuse numbering used for paragraphs
Hi
Changed function lcl_formatPersianWord to be more generic, and added support
for some more numbering types:
English word: one, two, three, ...
English cardinal: first, second, third, ...
English cardinal semi-word: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, ...
Persian cardinal word.
I used C++ macros, but do not know
