Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice.boldandbusted.com] cppcheck's unusedFunction check activated

2011-09-21 Thread julien2412
Great ! The false positive we talked about are gone ! Thank you ! Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice-boldandbusted-com-cppcheck-s-unusedFunction-check-activated-tp3348745p3354804.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice.boldandbusted.com] cppcheck's unusedFunction check activated

2011-09-20 Thread julien2412
Hello Jesse, I tested on a small piece of code, unused function check works. About unused function, there is the file unusedcode.easy regularly regenerated by Caolán. So I don't know. I wonder too if git updating cppcheck would remove the false positive Boolean result is used in bitwise

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice.boldandbusted.com] cppcheck's unusedFunction check activated

2011-09-20 Thread Jesse Adelman
On 09/20/11 14:23, julien2412 wrote: Hello Jesse, I tested on a small piece of code, unused function check works. About unused function, there is the file unusedcode.easy regularly regenerated by Caolán. So I don't know. I wonder too if git updating cppcheck would remove the false

[Libreoffice] [libreoffice.boldandbusted.com] cppcheck's unusedFunction check activated

2011-09-19 Thread Jesse Adelman
Hi *, I made an adjustment to the run line for cppcheck, removing -j 2. Removing parallel jobs allows the unusedFunction check to run, and only lifts the run time from around 2 hours to 3. I have zero clue as to if this unused function check really works (especially against this giant codebase),