Hi Michael,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:22:22AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 08:27 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > It was not luck, there was some conditional code to use either GNU or
> > straight cp. It may have been a hack though.
>
> Hey - well, if we can do a bu
Hi Francois,
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 08:27 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> It was not luck, there was some conditional code to use either GNU or
> straight cp. It may have been a hack though.
Hey - well, if we can do a build with your 'cp' that works, then we
should tweak the configure chec
Hey Bjoern,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:05:07AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 06:09:10 +0100
> Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> > Well, all my builds of the last few month were run without it.
>
> That is luck and you dont want to count on that. Anyone using a
> variable GNUCOP
Hi Francois,
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 06:09:10 +0100
Francois Tigeot wrote:
> Well, all my builds of the last few month were run without it.
That is luck and you dont want to count on that. Anyone using a
variable GNUCOPY in the old build system has every right to expect it
to contain a GNU cp.
> N
Hi Bjoern,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:36:02AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:17:34 +0100
> Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> > configure: error: no, GNU cp needed. install or specify
> > with --with-gnu-cp=/path/to/it
>
> As the guy who changed that (back when I was still
