On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or two
at most (unx and wnt). Thoughts ?
That will break cross-compilation as
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:07:03AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or
two
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:15:50AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I have no idea how cross-compilation is currently implemented, but can't
that
be done with the same build directory name for all platforms ?
Not unless the way it is done currently is changed. New ideas, and patches to
Then we should only need two build directories:
- one for the host binaries
- one for the target binaries
Bzzt, you are misunderstanding the GNU autofoo cross-compilation terminology;)
(A *very* common trap to fall in...)
In general, in GNU autofoo cross-compilation terminology, there
Hi Tor,
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 00:15:50 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ?
Yes please.
The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different output
hierarchies when switching branches is nice to have in order to not
spoil already
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 00:15:50 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
For instance, when cross-compiling to PowerPC Linux from x86_64 Linux
(hypothetical example, but as such potentially useful), idlc would be
in solver/350/unxlngx6.pro/bin, and the PowerPC binaries being
produced in
Sent from my iPhone
On 30.08.2011, at 14:40, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
Hi Tor,
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 00:15:50 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ?
Yes please.
The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different
Hi Stephan,
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 14:59:23 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ?
Yes please.
The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different output
hierarchies when switching branches is nice to have in order to not
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 14:59:23 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ?
Yes please.
The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different output
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
The build system uses so many flags and tricks it can't run as-is under
the pkgsrc framework, many libraries are not found at link time.
Some platforms don't understand the -rlink-path and related options either.
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 10:20:05 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
You can try git-new-workdir
http://kohei.us/2010/11/16/working-with-a-branch-using-git-new-workdir/
Way cool, thanks! I'll try that one day.
Eike
--
PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
The build system uses so many flags and tricks it can't run as-is under
the pkgsrc framework, many libraries are not found at link time.
Some
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:42:42PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Which reminds me there may be other places that rely on the $UPD path
particle.
Francois, did you adapt solenv/bin/linkoo as well?
Good catch, I didn't.
What does this file do ? I did a complete build before commiting the patch
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
The build system uses so many flags and tricks it can't run as-is
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On
Hi Francois,
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 17:49:06 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Francois, did you adapt solenv/bin/linkoo as well?
Good catch, I didn't.
What does this file do ? I did a complete build before commiting the patch
and there was no obvious problem.
When doing make dev-install
Hi Eike,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:42:54PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 17:49:06 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Francois, did you adapt solenv/bin/linkoo as well?
Good catch, I didn't.
What does this file do ? I did a complete build before commiting the patch
I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or two
at most (unx and wnt). Thoughts ?
That will break cross-compilation as currently implemented. It isn't entirely
unthinkable that somebody might at some point want to cross-compile from some
(well, *the*) mainstream
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17:33AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I'd like to consolidate the different OUTPATH values to a single one or two
at most (unx and wnt). Thoughts ?
That will break cross-compilation as currently implemented. It isn't entirely
unthinkable that somebody might at
Hi,
I have been packaging snapshots of LibreOffice in pkgsrc for a few months
now, and the $OUTPATH directory is a pain to manage.
There are tons of different possible values for this variable (no less than
13 for Linux !), and I have to maintain the list in my build scripts in
addition to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
