On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 12:25 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:36 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > so apparently for some reason having *two* lines with symlink: in it
> > with the same target breaks (which is news to me). Someone should have a
> > look at deliver in the sole
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:36 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> so apparently for some reason having *two* lines with symlink: in it
> with the same target breaks (which is news to me). Someone should have a
> look at deliver in the solenv to find what it does on seeing a
> "symlink:" line and try and
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:38:42PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
> On the other hand, I've already looked at configure.in, and if you ask
> for system cppunit it just assumes it's there. I've already modded that
This is not true:
dnl ===
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:36:40PM +, Caolán McNamara
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:10 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> > Just doing an emerge cppunit.
>
> It shouldn't be necessary to use system cppunit, cppunit should be built
> as part of the build.
>
> So, lets just document debugging thi
On 05/11/10 21:36, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:10 +, Wols Lists wrote:
>> Just doing an emerge cppunit.
> It shouldn't be necessary to use system cppunit, cppunit should be built
> as part of the build.
And now I've played, if you ask for system cppunit and it's not there
On 05/11/10 21:36, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:10 +, Wols Lists wrote:
>> > Just doing an emerge cppunit.
> It shouldn't be necessary to use system cppunit, cppunit should be built
> as part of the build.
Okay, I'll try and take a look.
On the other hand, I've already loo
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:10 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> Just doing an emerge cppunit.
It shouldn't be necessary to use system cppunit, cppunit should be built
as part of the build.
So, lets just document debugging this...
sal/cppunittester/makefile.mk has
APP1STDLIBS = $(CPPUNITLIB) $(SALLIB)
On 05/11/10 20:44, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> Wols Lists wrote:
>> Just (yet again :-) done a completely fresh download of libreoffice,
>> type "make", and I get the following fail :-(
>>
>> I'll investigate further, but has somebody just committed a change and
>> broken it?
>>
>
> ...
>
>>
>> Ente
Wols Lists wrote:
Just (yet again :-) done a completely fresh download of libreoffice,
type "make", and I get the following fail :-(
I'll investigate further, but has somebody just committed a change and
broken it?
...
Entering /home/anthony/gitstuff/loffice/rawbuild/sal/cppunittester
Mak
Just (yet again :-) done a completely fresh download of libreoffice,
type "make", and I get the following fail :-(
I'll investigate further, but has somebody just committed a change and
broken it?
Cheers,
Wol
Entering /home/anthony/gitstuff/loffice/rawbuild/sal/cpprt
Making:all_salcpprt.dp
10 matches
Mail list logo
