On 09/27/2011 09:00 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Hi all,
As has recently been discussed on #libreoffice-dev, its probably a good
idea to remove the rather unhelpful conversion operators
rtl::OString::operator sal_Char const * ()
rtl::OStringBuffer::operator sal_Char const * ()
Hi all,
As has recently been discussed on #libreoffice-dev, its probably a good
idea to remove the rather unhelpful conversion operators
rtl::OString::operator sal_Char const * ()
rtl::OStringBuffer::operator sal_Char const * ()
rtl::OUString::operator sal_Unicode const * ()
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 21:00 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
introduce the operator [] replacements.
Any reason, we make operator[] const ?, i.e. unassignable. plenty of
code out there using operator[] to get a given index, and setCharAt to
set it, which is kind of clumsy.
C.
On 09/27/2011 09:07 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 21:00 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
introduce the operator [] replacements.
Any reason, we make operator[] const ?, i.e. unassignable. plenty of
code out there using operator[] to get a given index, and setCharAt to
set it,
On 09/27/2011 09:21 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(Note that my commits just broke various tinderboxes due to some GCCs
apparently complaining about alleged ambiguities in a+=b when a is a
tools String and b an rtl::OUString; fixing it right now.)
Hopefully fixed now with
