On 11/02/2011 05:21 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
The benefits of the stable ABI requirement are somewhat unclear to me.
Mostly for the benefit of (external) client code. Also, as a secondary
effect, striving for a stable API probably tends to make the authors of
the API work harder to pr
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 15:47 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 07:50 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > Wouldn't they benefit/suffer from the stable ABI requirement then,
> > whereas in comphelper they don't? Or am I mislead?
>
> Yup, that was the original rationale for introducing
> comphel
On 11/01/2011 07:50 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Wouldn't they benefit/suffer from the stable ABI requirement then,
whereas in comphelper they don't? Or am I mislead?
Yup, that was the original rationale for introducing
comphelper/string.hxx, see the comment at the start of the file.
Stephan
_
Hi Michael,
On Tuesday, 2011-11-01 11:58:52 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Which makes me wonder whether we should be moving comphelper's
> string.hxx methods into sal/ anyway
Wouldn't they benefit/suffer from the stable ABI requirement then,
whereas in comphelper they don't? Or am I mislea
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 11:58 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Which makes me wonder whether we should be moving comphelper's
> string.hxx methods into sal/ anyway - they look reasonably sensible
> seemingly
case-by-case basis generally. e.g. methinks now that NaturalStringSorter
should go into i
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 11:01 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Generally IIRC StringBuffers were the way to go. You can find
> padToLength in comphelper/inc/string.hxx which expands a buffer to the
> desired length and pads it with the requested character, which is pretty
> much an equivalent to the
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:15 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> However, I would also be sceptical that there are that many places that
> actually need to construct such an (immutable!) string---maybe at least
> some of the places are misguided attempts at preallocating some buffer
> of a given len
Hi Christina,
Great to see you here again :-)
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 22:18 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
> the deprecated string classes have a Fill(n,c) method which fills a
> string with a single character c repeated n times. I found ~50
> occurrences of Fill() using "git grep", so it mi
On 10/29/2011 10:18 PM, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
the deprecated string classes have a Fill(n,c) method which fills a
string with a single character c repeated n times. I found ~50
occurrences of Fill() using "git grep", so it might be worth to add a
Fill() method to OUString. Maybe the name of the
Hi,
the deprecated string classes have a Fill(n,c) method which fills a
string with a single character c repeated n times. I found ~50
occurrences of Fill() using "git grep", so it might be worth to add a
Fill() method to OUString. Maybe the name of the new method could be a
bit more verbose
10 matches
Mail list logo
