On Thursday 18 of August 2011, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Lubos Lunak wrote:
However, I can't help noticing that the template layout is ... er, not
suitable for easy use:
How about attached patch? Does that address your points?
It does, but does it really need to be so chatty to repeat the
On Thursday 18 of August 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:21:54 +0200
Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
It does, but does it really need to be so chatty to repeat the
obvious facts that each contributor's copyright relates only to
portions created by that
Hi Lubos,
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:02 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
And do we have somebody like that? Who can decide if it is ok to change the
template to this version?
Yes - and yes it's fine.
Just an idea: IIRC we have a git hook
that warns about commiting files with merge
Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:02 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
And do we have somebody like that? Who can decide if it is ok to change
the
template to this version?
Yes - and yes it's fine.
Good then, tweaked Lubos' proposal with the conflict markers
pushed.
On Tuesday 16 of August 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Lubos,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 12:09 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
No, starmath doesn't need to call back to writer. The problem is that
this is still needlessly complicated. How about the attached patch?
I like it's simplicity
