On 04/20/2012 12:42 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
1) Exceptions have message and context fields and there should be a
constructor with arguments (java.lang.String m, java.lang.Object c)
for those fields. However, this doesn't seem to be applied
consistently.
Where is this not applied
Hi all,
bellow are some patches fixing minor issues with idl files.
Also I would like to ask:
1) Exceptions have message and context fields and there should be a
constructor with arguments (java.lang.String m, java.lang.Object c)
for those fields. However, this doesn't seem to be applied
On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
index f87d245..cfb42b6 100644
--- a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
+++ b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
@@ -27,7 +27,7
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com writes:
On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
...
Are you sure that this is right, using chart2 entities from within
chart? I
On 01/05/2012 09:38 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
Stephan Bergmannsberg...@redhat.com writes:
On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
...
Are you sure that this is right, using chart2
Hi Tomas,
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 23:09 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
sorry for inconvenience, I have sent the License statement email to the
mailing list so please feel free to reapply the patch.
Thanks ! - I pushed it to master; it also seems to be in the 3.5
branch, so hopefully it
On 05/01/12 09:38, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com writes:
On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
b/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
...
Are you sure that this is right,
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com writes:
On 01/05/2012 09:38 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
Stephan Bergmannsberg...@redhat.com writes:
On 01/04/2012 11:09 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/chart/XAxisSupplier.idl
What exactly is broken?
as Michael Stahl
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com writes:
Thanks ! - I pushed it to master; it also seems to be in the 3.5
branch, so hopefully it should be there too for you in the release :-)
Thank you!
Tomas
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi Michael,
Until then I'll reverting the patch, in case I forget later; we
wouldn't like to accidentally license your code against your wishes.
sorry for inconvenience, I have sent the License statement email to the
mailing list so please feel free to reapply the patch.
Also, I attach a few
On 12/13/2011 01:21 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
Stephan Bergmannsberg...@redhat.com writes:
At runtime, the C++ UNO binding queries the types.rdb for certain data
(e.g., when (un-)packing data as ANY).
OK. Does it need to go through the rdb file? It could as well be
already compiled into a
Hi Tomas,
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 00:52 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
that they are tiny,
What does tiny mean?
Well - you're going to find it hard to make it bigger than the existing
rdb files ;-) but by tiny I really mean fast to read from disk and fast
to parse.
Currently, rdb files
On 12/13/2011 11:15 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 00:52 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
If 200ms is slow, we could split the allpp,idl file into something
smaller required at startup and the rest loaded lazily.
Possibly; or we could invent yet another format for this type
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 14:57 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
I would be happy with LGPLv3+ but I haven't found much on why was MPL
added and/or preffered for new contributions. Could you please point me
to some discussions so I can make up my mind on this matter?
Sure; so - the
On 12/10/2011 02:57 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
There seems to be agreement that the RDB type database should go away.
There are several LO projects that would be affected by this and they
seem rather complex with dependencies. Also, for example the conversion
from uno idl to java and cli goes
Hi Michael,
This would allow us to get rid of the RDB files (although I need to
familiarise myself with current use-cases to understand the impact of
such change, e.g. merging in custom plugins).
So, there are rather a number of hidden criteria for RDB files:
that they are tiny,
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com writes:
Historically, the situation is as follows:
thanks a lot!
At runtime, the C++ UNO binding queries the types.rdb for certain data
(e.g., when (un-)packing data as ANY).
OK. Does it need to go through the rdb file? It could as well be
Hi Michael,
Nice work - thanks :-) It'd be great if you could give an explicit
licensing statement for your contributions; something like:
All my contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under
the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license
or somesuch :-) then we can add you to:
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 00:02 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
attached is a patch to fix some broken IDL files.
Nice work - thanks :-) It'd be great if you could give an explicit
licensing statement for your contributions; something like:
All my contributions to
Hi all,
attached is a patch to fix some broken IDL files.
Thank you,
Tomas
From d66bf0eea556f71b25c526e7916d7aaea739c8a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomas Hlavaty t...@logand.com
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 23:52:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] minor idl fixes
---
20 matches
Mail list logo
