review for patch for tdf#127785 Apply 180deg compensation for flipV to text range

Hi all, because my first attempt to fix the error was wrong, I have made a new proposal in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/80310/ To be sure, that it is correct now, it would be nice, if you review the patch. Some comments and test documents are in the bug report. But perhaps you know

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127710] PATCH: fix sending documents to Claws Mail

the patch. Could you please upload to gerrit as described here < https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit/SubmitPatch > ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffic

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127710] PATCH: fix sending documents to Claws Mail

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127710 --- Comment #1 from p...@claws-mail.org --- i was told on irc to include a license statement for the patch. It has the same license as the file it patches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127710] New: PATCH: fix sending documents to Claws Mail

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127710 Bug ID: 127710 Summary: PATCH: fix sending documents to Claws Mail Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: Reverting patch

the respective branch How to "build the respective branch" ? After you have checked out the gerrit patch, you can build it the same way as you build master, i.e. run './autogen.sh' and then 'make'. The checkout will be the branch that the gerrit patch has been cherry-picked to, e.g. the libre

Re: Reverting patch

tive branch > > How to "build the respective branch" ? After you have checked out the gerrit patch, you can build it the same way as you build master, i.e. run './autogen.sh' and then 'make'. The checkout will be the branch that the gerrit patch has been cherry-picked to, e.g. the libreoffice-

Re: Reverting patch

On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 21:44 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > > The "cherry pick" button in Gerrit provides "LibreOffice 6-3", > "LibreOffice 6-3-0" and "LibreOffice 6-3-1". Which item would be the > correct one? 6.3.0 is released so ignore 6-3-0 Cherry-pick to 6-3 first to get it into the 6-3

Re: Reverting patch

Hi Regina, On 21/08/2019 21.44, Regina Henschel wrote: > it is about https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/77882/ > That reverts a patch, that I had made 9 months ago, because it had > introduced a regression, see bug 126271. I have submitted the revert to > master. >

Reverting patch

Hi all, it is about https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/77882/ That reverts a patch, that I had made 9 months ago, because it had introduced a regression, see bug 126271. I have submitted the revert to master. Unfortunately, this regression is in LibreOffice 6.3 too. Of cause I have tested

SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

Hello all, I would like to ask if I or any other from OpenOffice Development team can port the patch from LibreOffice to OpenOffice to fix this Issue under the APL2 License, so the Issue can be fixed in OpenOffice without more work then necessary. LO Issue: 114939 OO Issue: 127661 Thanks

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124118] Old Hungarian letters doesn't appeared in typing time on 6.0.0.0beta, produce tofus under KDE. Patch is given and works on 6.4.0.0Alpha.

|doesn't appeared in typing |doesn't appeared in typing |time on 6.0.0.0beta,|time on 6.0.0.0beta, |produce tofus under KDE.|produce tofus under KDE. |Patch is given and works. |Patch is given and works

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124118] Old Hungarian letters doesn't appeared in typing time on 6.0.0.0beta, produce tofus under KDE. Patch is given and works.

|doesn't appeared in typing |doesn't appeared in typing |time, produce tofus under |time on 6.0.0.0beta, |KDE.|produce tofus under KDE. ||Patch is given and works. -- You

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120710] Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned"

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120710 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120710] Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned"

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120710 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org ---

Fwd: [PATCH] Add content_rating to AppData files

FYI. If anybody thinks the answers I picked below are sufficiently wrong: please comment. Forwarded Message Subject: [PATCH] Add content_rating to AppData files Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 09:13:54 +0200 From: Stephan Bergmann (via Code Review) Reply-To: sberg...@redhat.com CC

Re: Question about submitting patch for dictionaries

On 05.05.19 14:33, julien2412 wrote: Hello, I'm trying to submit a patch for dictionaries part. In /dictionaries I typed this: ../logerrit submit After several minutes, it's still trying to send the patch. Did I miss something? apparently there was some network routing problem yesterday

Re: Question about submitting patch for dictionaries

I gave a try to https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Submodules but it finally really pushed directly the patch. However, I had also took a look to the content of loggerrit and saw that "submit" was calling "push". So I'm a bit confused... If my patch is wrong, don'

Question about submitting patch for dictionaries

Hello, I'm trying to submit a patch for dictionaries part. In /dictionaries I typed this: ../logerrit submit After several minutes, it's still trying to send the patch. Did I miss something? I know there is this page https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Submodules but I thought

Re: Permission not granted to push my patch

Il 04/05/2019 11:49, Kaganski Mike ha scritto: > Hi, > > On 04.05.2019 12:45, Cyrille wrote: >> I tried: >> git push ssh://lafric...@gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/dictionaries >> HEAD:refs/for/master >> >> I got now this error: >> remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1/1) >> remote: Processing

Re: Permission not granted to push my patch

Hi, On 04.05.2019 12:45, Cyrille wrote: > I tried: > git push ssh://lafric...@gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/dictionaries > HEAD:refs/for/master > > I got now this error: > remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1/1) > remote: Processing changes: refs: 1, done > remote: ERROR: [b5f81e8] missing

Re: Permission not granted to push my patch

I tried: git push ssh://lafric...@gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/dictionaries HEAD:refs/for/master I got now this error: remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1/1) remote: Processing changes: refs: 1, done    remote: ERROR: [b5f81e8] missing Change-Id in commit message footer remote: remote: Hint: To

Re: Permission not granted to push my patch

Il 04/05/2019 11:39, Christian Lohmaier ha scritto: > Hi, Hi, Thank you for the help. > > I.e. push to refs/for/master Then the good command is: git push ssh://lafric...@gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/dictionaries refs/for/master Or: git push

Re: Permission not granted to push my patch

Hi, On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:36 PM Cyrille wrote: > I would like to push dictionaries on the dictionaries branch on Gerrit. > But when I try to push I have an issue with permission: > git push ssh://lafric...@gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/dictionaries > HEAD:kikongo You cannot create branches

Permission not granted to push my patch

Hello, I would like to push dictionaries on the dictionaries branch on Gerrit. But when I try to push I have an issue with permission: git push ssh://lafric...@gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/dictionaries HEAD:kikongo Enter passphrase for key '/home/cyrille/.ssh/id_rsa': Décompte des objets: 13,

Looking for review for patch for tdf#115813

Hi all, I'm still working on https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115813 Position shifted while moving the handle of OOXML Callout shape My solution is now in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/71258/ The patch handles only the case of XY-handles in preset OOXML-shapes. I

Re: Call for suggestion to a patch for tdf#114311

Hi Andras, Thanks a lot for your reply. On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:20:27 +0100, Andras Timar wrote: > Hi, (snip) > I merged your patch to master, thank you. Do not worry about translations, > the new string will be automatically extracted by l10ntools. It's a normal > to add new

Re: Call for suggestion to a patch for tdf#114311

Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:16 PM Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > Having uploaded a patch [1] for tdf#114311 a month ago, I would like > to ask developers who are familiar with Windows installation to check > it. At least I have confirmed that it works on a Windows 10. > >

Call for suggestion to a patch for tdf#114311

Hi, Having uploaded a patch [1] for tdf#114311 a month ago, I would like to ask developers who are familiar with Windows installation to check it. At least I have confirmed that it works on a Windows 10. It would be necessary to tweak the translations submodule simultaneously to complete

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120710] Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned"

o_Bold.ttf,DestName=LiberationMono-Bold.ttf,Attributes=16384,FileSize=301684,PerTick=65536,,VerifyMedia=1,CheckCRC=0,Version=2.0.1.0,,InstallMode=58982400,,,) MSI (s) (0C:B4) [12:50:03:420]: File: C:\WINDOWS\Fonts\LiberationMono-Bold.ttf; To be installed;Won't patch;No existing

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120710] Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned"

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120710 --- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski --- I'm not sure we want to fix this. It's unfortunate that we had bugs that resulted in "unversioned" fonts installed; but I cannot see how could we tell for sure if the unversioned version is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120710] Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned"

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120710 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120710] Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned"

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120710 --- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote --- Created attachment 145833 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=145833=edit zip Windows MSI verbose log of update from 6.1.1.2 -> 6.1.3.1 -- You are receiving this mail

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120710] Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned"

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120710 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120710] New: Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned"

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120710 Bug ID: 120710 Summary: Update font showing "Won't patch; New file versioned -existing file unversioned" Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.1.2.1 release

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/lhm/libreoffice-4-1-6+backports' - nss/nss-no-c99.patch nss/nss.patch

nss/nss-no-c99.patch | 111 --- nss/nss.patch|2 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) New commits: commit cac9ecae63d789e03241ed85cf5c43832b3d15d8 Author: Thorsten Behrens AuthorDate: Thu Oct 11 16:04:39 2018 +0200

Re: Submitted patch builds "Aborted by user anonymous"

Hi Brian, You can trigger a new build by rebasing your change, by using the button ("Rebase") on gerrit. Best, Muhammet On 09/27/2018 06:28 PM, Brian Fraser wrote: Hello, I submitted a patch to gerrit a week ago which shows the MacOS and Linux (clang) builds as "Aborted by

Submitted patch builds "Aborted by user anonymous"

Hello, I submitted a patch to gerrit a week ago which shows the MacOS and Linux (clang) builds as "Aborted by user anonymous": https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/60707/ How can I trigger a restart of the build so that the patch can be code reviewed? Thank

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/lhm/libreoffice-4-1-6+backports' - 2 commits - download.lst external/curl nss/nss-no-c99.patch nss/nss.patch nss/nss.windowbuild.patch.0 nss/UnpackedTarb

download.lst |4 external/curl/CVE-2018-14618.patch| 34 external/curl/UnpackedTarball_curl.mk |1 nss/UnpackedTarball_nss.mk|3 nss/nss-no-c99.patch | 2526 +- nss/nss.patch

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - 3 commits - default_images/introabout external_deps.lst i18npool/source libxml2/libxml2-c99.patch libxml2/libxml2-configure.patch libxml2/libxml2-l

libxml2/libxml2-c99.patch | 48 - libxml2/libxml2-configure.patch | 12 ++-- libxml2/libxml2-long-path.patch | 18 -- libxml2/libxml2-nan-inf-fix.patch | 60 ++ libxml2

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/lhm/libreoffice-4-1-6+backports' - python3/python-3.3.7-c99.patch.1 python3/python-3.3.7-vcproj.patch.1 python3/UnpackedTarball_python3.mk

python3/UnpackedTarball_python3.mk |2 + python3/python-3.3.7-c99.patch.1| 38 python3/python-3.3.7-vcproj.patch.1 | 20 ++ 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+) New commits: commit d46694b4f7f745a5095b04137ee50b8aa03914b1 Author

Re: Fwd: [PATCH] xmlsecurity: nsscrypto_initialize: try to avoid profile migr...

to test if it actually works? Miklos pointed me to an "old" unit test profile in xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/ and the patch does appear to have the intended effect, so it's pushed now. but i'm thinking we need some insight here before backporting the recent bundled N

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/lhm/libreoffice-4-1-6+backports' - 9 commits - configure.ac curl/curl-7.26.0_mingw.patch curl/curl-7.26.0_nspr.patch curl/curl-7.26.0.patch curl/curl-7.2

| 43 - curl/curl-7.26.0.patch| 86 --- curl/curl-7.26.0_win.patch| 59 - curl/curl-aix.patch | 13 -- download.lst |3 external

Fwd: [PATCH] xmlsecurity: nsscrypto_initialize: try to avoid profile migr...

thinking we need some insight here before backporting the recent bundled NSS upgrade to release branches :) Forwarded Message Subject: [PATCH] xmlsecurity: nsscrypto_initialize: try to avoid profile migr... Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:02:55 +0200 From: Michael Stahl (via Code

Fwd: [PATCH] xmlsecurity: nsscrypto_initialize: try to avoid profile migr...

thinking we need some insight here before backporting the recent bundled NSS upgrade to release branches :) Forwarded Message Subject: [PATCH] xmlsecurity: nsscrypto_initialize: try to avoid profile migr... Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:02:55 +0200 From: Michael Stahl (via Code

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/lhm/libreoffice-4-1-6+backports' - 33 commits - download.lst editeng/source expat/expat-2.1.0.patch expat/StaticLibrary_expat.mk expat/StaticLibrary_expa

| 1 expat/StaticLibrary_expat_x64.mk | 1 expat/UnpackedTarball_expat.mk| 3 expat/expat-2.1.0.patch | 13 graphite

Re: Can someone kindly backport a patch to 6.1?

> I recently pushed to master a patch [1] for an issue I introduced > in LO 6.1.0.0.alpha0+ [2]. This patch will be integrated in 6.2, can > someone kindly backport it to 6.1? It seems that I have no push rights > to such branch. You can push, but you’ve got to send

Can someone kindly backport a patch to 6.1?

Dear all, I recently pushed to master a patch [1] for an issue I introduced in LO 6.1.0.0.alpha0+ [2]. This patch will be integrated in 6.2, can someone kindly backport it to 6.1? It seems that I have no push rights to such branch. Kind regards Matteo [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org

Re: [PATCH] Icon themes clean-up

Fallback is now [1] much simpler than before OUString ImplImageTree::fallbackStyle(const OUString& rsStyle) { OUString sResult; if (rsStyle == "colibre" || rsStyle == "helpimg") sResult = ""; else if (rsStyle == "sifr_dark" ) sResult = "breeze_dark"; else if

Re: [PATCH] Icon themes clean-up

Hi Heiko, On 12/05/18 11:03, Heiko Tietze (via Code Review) wrote: > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/54158 As per IRC: wrt. the INDUSTRIAL_FALLBACK in postprocess/ foo.mk Just delete all of the lines that have that mentioned =) Having said all this - it

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - python/makefile.mk python/python-2.7.14-msvs9-dir.patch python/python-2.7.14-msvs9-no-host-python.patch python/python-2.7.14-msvs9.patch python/pyt

python/makefile.mk | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) New commits: commit dd46274b48db84df03801dd858c52c4012cf00db Author: Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> Date: Wed Mar 14 02:30:11 2018 + python: rename pcbuild to msvs9 in patch names to

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - 2 commits - icc/makefile.mk icc/SampleICC-1.3.2-Win64.patch salhelper/source

icc/SampleICC-1.3.2-Win64.patch | 11 +++ icc/makefile.mk |2 - salhelper/source/makefile.mk|2 + salhelper/source/mscx.map | 58 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit

Re: calc / column limit patch ...

On 2017/11/15 6:08 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Its getting a bit close to the 6.0 freeze, and Dennis is still working hard to get the calc threading stuff merged. Eike said he'd take a look at your patch upping the column limit after your re-factoring, and had a few ideas of what

Re: [PATCH feature/new-vcl-scheduler] noop commit: trigger test build for branch feature/new-vcl-s...

Hi Jan-Marek, On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 08:43:24PM +, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote: > Nothing from my heart. The scheduler was asked to process all pending events, > but for whatever reason there is still an idle event left (Idle). > > My guess is that I broke something with

Re: [PATCH feature/new-vcl-scheduler] noop commit: trigger test build for branch feature/new-vcl-s...

Am 13. Juli 2017 21:08:29 MESZ schrieb Miklos Vajna : >Hi Jan-Marek, > >Jenkins just failed in a vcl/scheduler assertion for me: > >https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/lo_gerrit/14865/Config=linux_clang_dbgutil_64/console > >It does not seem to be clang, I can reproduce the

Re: [PATCH feature/new-vcl-scheduler] noop commit: trigger test build for branch feature/new-vcl-s...

Hi Jan-Marek, Jenkins just failed in a vcl/scheduler assertion for me: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/lo_gerrit/14865/Config=linux_clang_dbgutil_64/console It does not seem to be clang, I can reproduce the same with a local gcc build. I guess the relevant line is: cppunittester:

Re: #tdf104008 : patch gerrit 32664

contact me. I am here to help you (and others) in getting their first patch submitted. LibreOffice is a very big program and getting it built, setting up gerrit, and getting the first patch right can be a bit challenging, therefore do not hesitate to email me if you want help. We have made a step

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in configure.ac (mk68 -> m68k)

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 07:16:02PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Signed-off-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > --- > configure.ac | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 731e903..4480ed0

[PATCH] Fix typo in configure.ac (mk68 -> m68k)

This should be "m68k". Looking at the configure.ac script, it's very obvious where this typo comes from: > my_java_arch=mk68 This should be, of course: > my_java_arch=m68k The attached patch fixes the typo. Th

[PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in configure.ac (mk68 -> m68k)

Rene pushed the patch, see https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f35d29c8388744be1f95ec4acfca12eec706911a -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-Fix-typo-in-configure-ac-mk68-m68k-tp4201156p4201163.html Sent from the Dev mailing list

[PATCH] Fix typo in configure.ac (mk68 -> m68k)

Signed-off-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 731e903..4480ed0 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -7121,7 +7121,7 @@ then

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100836] [PATCH] Proposed update for " Starting the LibreOffice Software With Parameters" help page

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100836 tagezi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - 2 commits - boost/boost_1_55_0.patch python/prj

boost/boost_1_55_0.patch | 21 + python/prj/d.lst | 28 ++-- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) New commits: commit bd7f7dc8944333f3e18156d4bd446d1a240ef59c Author: Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> Date: Sat Sep 3 08

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - external_deps.lst libxml2/libxml2-c99.patch libxml2/libxml2-configure.patch libxml2/libxml2-long-path.patch libxml2/makefile.mk

external_deps.lst |4 +-- libxml2/libxml2-c99.patch | 48 libxml2/libxml2-configure.patch | 12 +- libxml2/libxml2-long-path.patch |4 +-- libxml2/makefile.mk |7 +++-- 5 files changed, 62 insertions

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 5.2 sdk patch - java extensions makefile bug sdk/classes/settings/std.mk

Got there - packaged as a first patch, ready for review: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/28317/ On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:40:57PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 08/18/2016 03:51 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > >Got stuck needing a simple fix, for the following bug: > > >

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - external_deps.lst libxslt/libxslt-configure.patch libxslt/libxslt-CVE-2015-7995.patch libxslt/libxslt-internal-symbols.patch libxslt/libxsltversion

external_deps.lst |4 - libxslt/libxslt-CVE-2015-7995.patch| 24 -- libxslt/libxslt-configure.patch| 74 + libxslt/libxslt-internal-symbols.patch | 18 libxslt/libxslt-win_manifest.patch |6

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - graphite/graphite-2.3.1.patch

graphite/graphite-2.3.1.patch | 12 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) New commits: commit 5b6c4bddf6134f377a61446d8bcf1be2f096aad1 Author: Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> Date: Fri Aug 5 05:49:46 2016 + Fix --enable-debug build with clang as the compiler.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100836] [PATCH] Proposed update for " Starting the LibreOffice Software With Parameters" help page

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100836 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #126495|0 |1

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100836] [PATCH] Proposed update for " Starting the LibreOffice Software With Parameters" help page

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100836 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #126150|0 |1

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101186] [patch] Build failure in ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ ftploaderthread.cxx: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to ' CURL* {aka Curl_easy*}'

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101186 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101186] New: [patch] Build failure in ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ ftploaderthread.cxx: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to ' CURL* {aka Curl_easy*}'

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101186 Bug ID: 101186 Summary: [patch] Build failure in ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ftploaderthread.cxx: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'CURL* {aka Curl_easy*}' Product

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - curl/curl-7.19.7.patch curl/curl-7.19.7_win.patch curl/curl-7.49.1_win.patch curl/makefile.mk curl/prj external_deps.lst LICENSE

LICENSE| 11 +-- curl/curl-7.19.7.patch | 148 - curl/curl-7.19.7_win.patch | 19 - curl/curl-7.49.1_win.patch | 35 ++ curl/makefile.mk | 16 ++-- curl/prj/d.lst |4

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100836] [PATCH] Proposed update for " Starting the LibreOffice Software With Parameters" help page

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100836 Adolfo Jayme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100836] New: [PATCH] Proposed update for " Starting the LibreOffice Software With Parameters" help page

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100836 Bug ID: 100836 Summary: [PATCH] Proposed update for "Starting the LibreOffice Software With Parameters" help page Product: LibreOffice Version: u

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - 3 commits - boost/boost_1_55_0.patch

boost/boost_1_55_0.patch | 225 +++ 1 file changed, 170 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) New commits: commit 34aa1d4ae4620182702659d3461739d666d2d63d Author: Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> Date: Mon Jun 6 14:32:23 2016 + #i126888#: b

Patch Review

Hello all! I'm in a confusion if my submitted patch is somehow wrong, https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/23661/ , or the developers are busy because it's been about 5 days and there is neither any review nor any comment. I don't know if it's wrong because I tested it myself and the transition

Re: Firebird 2.5 Patch to compile with Visual Studio 2015

I have updated the patch https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/23738 with mod_loader changes for vc14 https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird/commit/d520ac3fcdd48fa62155f02453aa8a6865e1cd72 removed external/firebird/firebird-vs2013.patch.1 is not needed anymore in 2.5.5 (applied upstream) On Fri

Re: Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

Hi, On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:45:28PM +0300, marius adrian popa wrote: > FB3 has no ICU sources in the tree anymore so is using system-icu by > default or the ones downloaded with libo tree (that is why it was removed > from the configure flags --with-system-icu) > > I will try now a libo build

Re: [Firebird-devel] Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:48:00PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:07:41PM +0300, marius adrian popa wrote: > > I started refactoring firebird 3.0 patch for libreoffice (updated to rc2) > > > https://gist.github.com/mariuz/bc

Re: Firebird 2.5 Patch to compile with Visual Studio 2015

al Firebird 2.5 Patch to compile with Visual Studio 2015 is now > merged , > > https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird/pull/12 > > Great! > > > I will add a gerrit for libreoffice also > > > https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/FirebirdSQL/fireb

Re: Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

Good news : Firebird 3.0 builds and works now with libreoffice I have updated the patch and now it compiles fine on ubuntu 15.10 x64 https://gist.github.com/mariuz/bcde7f783b657b2465e5 Submited new gerrit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/23737 On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:22 PM, marius adrian popa

Re: Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

False alarm it was the comments that i forgot in download.lst (I forgot to comment 2.5.5 and enable 3.0) I have updated the patch and now it compiles fine on ubuntu 15.10 x64 https://gist.github.com/mariuz/bcde7f783b657b2465e5 -# FIREBIRD_MD5SUM := b259c2d1c60a03bd104108405ae990a7 -# export

Re: Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

marius adrian popa wrote: > > > I started refactoring firebird 3.0 patch for libreoffice (updated to rc2) > > > > > https://gist.github.com/mariuz/bcde7f783b657b2465e5 > > > > > and there are few issues with icu linking > > > > > > > htt

Re: Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

-icu --with-system-icu-for-build=yes On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane <lio...@mamane.lu> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:07:41PM +0300, marius adrian popa wrote: > > I started refactoring firebird 3.0 patch for libreoffice (updated to rc2) > > > https:

Re: Firebird 2.5 Patch to compile with Visual Studio 2015

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:04:30PM +0300, marius adrian popa wrote: > Final Firebird 2.5 Patch to compile with Visual Studio 2015 is now merged , > https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird/pull/12 Great! > I will add a gerrit for libreoffice also > https://patch-diff.githubusercon

Re: Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:07:41PM +0300, marius adrian popa wrote: > I started refactoring firebird 3.0 patch for libreoffice (updated to rc2) > https://gist.github.com/mariuz/bcde7f783b657b2465e5 > and there are few issues with icu linking > https://gist.githu

Re: [Firebird-devel] Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

On 31/03/2016 16:07, marius adrian popa wrote: > I started refactoring firebird 3.0 patch for libreoffice (updated to rc2) > > https://gist.github.com/mariuz/bcde7f783b657b2465e5 > > and there are few issues with icu linking > > https://gist.github.com/mariuz/68588eabb4f

Icu error with Firebird 3.0 patch

I started refactoring firebird 3.0 patch for libreoffice (updated to rc2) https://gist.github.com/mariuz/bcde7f783b657b2465e5 and there are few issues with icu linking https://gist.github.com/mariuz/68588eabb4f40c8aa008a601eade91e2 https://gist.github.com/mariuz

Firebird 2.5 Patch to compile with Visual Studio 2015

Final Firebird 2.5 Patch to compile with Visual Studio 2015 is now merged , https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird/pull/12 I will add a gerrit for libreoffice also https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/FirebirdSQL/firebird/pull/12.patch ps: in Firebird tree i will send a pull request

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'aoo/trunk' - 6 commits - extensions.lst external_deps.lst graphite/graphite-2.3.1-CVE-2016-1521.patch graphite/makefile.mk sal/inc sdext/source set_soenv.in

extensions.lst | 60 ++-- external_deps.lst |5 +- graphite/graphite-2.3.1-CVE-2016-1521.patch | 20 + graphite/makefile.mk|2 sal/inc/rtl/string.hxx

A couple of gerrit patch for personalizations (e.g. personas)

Hi all, I posted a couple of gerrit patch: <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/23327/1> <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/23328/1> together they fix the personalization search and set the search url back to mozilla/org. -- Kind Regards, Giuseppe Castagno aka beppec56 Ac

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97772] Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0

|dtar...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from David Tardon <dtar...@redhat.com> --- $ patch --fuzz=0 -p0 < ../external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0 patching file src/lib/Makefile.in Hunk #1 succeeded at 540 (offset 77 lines). $ patch --version GNU patch 2.7.5 -- You are receiving th

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97772] Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 Maxim Monastirsky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97772] Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 --- Comment #2 from c...@gmx.com --- I don't really want to join another ML, and once I finish the build, I probably won't build LO again until 2020. It's been 14 hours now and still not finished. I have a somewhat old environment, so I

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97772] Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 Joel Madero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97772] Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 --- Comment #4 from c...@gmx.com --- I use LFS. GNU patch version 2.5.9. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97772] Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 Joel Madero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97772] Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 Joel Madero changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97772] New: Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bundled-soname.patch.0

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 Bug ID: 97772 Summary: Patch FAILED: libreoffice-5.1.0.3/external/libetonyek/libetonyek-bun dled-soname.patch.0 Product: LibreOffice Version: 5.1.0.3

Re: [PATCH] libvisio: Fix tests without tools

Could you send it as "git format-patch" or submit to gerrit, so that I can credit you properly? Cheers F. On 07/02/16 15:28, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > I'd like to submit an easy patch that fixes the tests when libvisio is built > without tools (in that case it was missing l

[PATCH] libvisio: Fix tests without tools

I'd like to submit an easy patch that fixes the tests when libvisio is built without tools (in that case it was missing librevenge-stream reference). Regards, Andreas Sturmlechner--- a/configure.ac 2015-07-25 09:29:53.0 +0200 +++ b/configure.ac 2016-02-07 00:19:30.534383076 +0100

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >