Hi,
The problem I was trying to fix was that if a custom animation list item
was part shown at the bottom of the list, then moving the item above it
down one item would leave it part visible, when I felt that when an item
was moved, it should stay fully visible. Please see attached image to see
Hi,
The problem I was trying to fix was that if a custom animation list item
was part shown at the bottom of the list, then moving the item above it
down one item would leave it part visible, when I felt that when an item
was moved, it should stay fully visible. Please see attached image to see
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 22:55 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
this patch reverts commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=16c9d63da67897e51960f3684d8d05b06f2c8f81
Quote:
This ensures that we don't get a half visible entry at the bottom of
the view.
I think Luke did
On 09.05.2012 15:06, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 22:55 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
this patch reverts commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=16c9d63da67897e51960f3684d8d05b06f2c8f81
Quote:
This ensures that we don't get a half visible entry at the bottom
Hi,
Le 09/05/2012 13:52, Ivan Timofeev a écrit :
[...]
Opinions from the UX point of view? :) Do we really need to shrink a
listbox so that it does not show a partially visible item at the
bottom,[...]?
A partially visible item at the bottom of a listbox, shows clearly that
there is
