Hi Tor,
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 19:23 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
In the feature/android branch I have added the fw[eiklm], sfx, sb, svt
and tk libraries to libmerged. Working on verifying that the last
addition didn't break anything; I found a nice direct reference to the
name tk in
Hi Matus,
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 01:05 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote:
It's going quite well. With tml's patch [1] we can add more.
He is doing great job, mostly in the android branch as he already said.
Cool :-) yep, I saw.
Current tail_build blocker is connectivity/. Peter was working on
On 14 February 2012 19:23, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
I also merged sal and sal_textenc (in the --enable-mergelibs case).
Hmm, I experimented with this but apparently didn't commit and then
did a git reset and lost the changes, or something. Will have a look
again if I still have the
On 15 February 2012 13:35, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 14 February 2012 19:23, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
I also merged sal and sal_textenc (in the --enable-mergelibs case).
Hmm, I experimented with this but apparently didn't commit and then
did a git reset and lost the
It was something more than this: ?
Umm, no, that was it. Now I am confused, why don't I see that in my
master checkout after merging the branch to master? Git is a mystery.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On 02/14/2012 06:23 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I also merged sal and sal_textenc (in the --enable-mergelibs case).
I'm not sure this is not counter-productive. For Android and iOS it
might be vital to get sal_textenc merged, to reduce the overall number
of dynamic libraries. But for other
On 02/15/2012 03:11 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I'm not sure this is not counter-productive. For Android and iOS it might
be vital to get sal_textenc merged,
Well, --enable-mergelibs is probably actually intended for Android
only, I think?
I wasn't sure about the status of --enable-mergelibs,
I wasn't sure about the status of --enable-mergelibs, whether it is only
something Android-specific or whether it is also used to enable that general
merge/LTO endeavor.
I don't know either, really. But anyway, I will make the
sal_textenc+sal merge Android-specific and not mergelibs-specific;)
On 02/13/2012 11:21 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
On 12 February 2012 23:51, Matúš Kukanmatus.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
Do not push them without improvement, make check fails for me.
Attached diff solves one problem but still there is something wrong.
Well, I was fooled by
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 23:21 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote:
I'd like to push attached patch. Hopefully it will work also for
others and there is nothing wrong with removing TestExtension.rdb from
TestExtension.oxt.
Nice ;-) I was wondering - how are we doing wrt. getting more of the
I was wondering - how are we doing wrt. getting more of the
libraries into tail_build and libmerged ?
In the feature/android branch I have added the fw[eiklm], sfx, sb, svt
and tk libraries to libmerged. Working on verifying that the last
addition didn't break anything; I found a nice direct
On 14 February 2012 18:12, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
Nice ;-) I was wondering - how are we doing wrt. getting more of the
libraries into tail_build and libmerged ? :-) I wonder could we get
'basic' into that ? svtools ? some of the 'helper' libraries ? :-)
It's going
On 12 February 2012 23:51, Matúš Kukan matus.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
Do not push them without improvement, make check fails for me.
Attached diff solves one problem but still there is something wrong.
Well, I was fooled by smoketest/com/sun/star/comp/smoketest/makefile.mk
There is javamaker
13 matches
Mail list logo