; TDF Marketing
; TDF Design
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] Moving to
LibreOffice 8?
Hello,
On 06.04.23 22:12, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
>
> Great, what's the problem? Why should we be in a rush to get existing
> users to upgrade from 7.5 to 7.6?
Wel
Hi everyone,
After reading all the messages in this topic, and learning how experienced marketing experts are in the team, I have the following humble
thoughts.
1.
I am a techie person who is far from being a marketing expert. Therefore, take
my opinion with a grain of salt.
2.
For most
Hi y'all,
Mike Saunders wrote:
> Well, one argument is that we have very limited resources to support two
> branches. LibreOffice 7.5 won't be around forever, so at some point we'll
> need to push people to update to 7.6/8.0, as the previous version won't be
> maintained and could potentially
Hello,
On 06.04.23 22:12, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
Great, what's the problem? Why should we be in a rush to get existing
users to upgrade from 7.5 to 7.6?
Well, one argument is that we have very limited resources to support two
branches. LibreOffice 7.5 won't be around forever, so at some
r suspect that most users never read them.
> >>>
> >>> The discussion of the different motivators for development and
> marketing
> >>> people is very interesting. When I was a developer neither I nor
> anybody in
> >>> my teams was ever let anywh
avo Buzzatti Pacheco
*Sent:* 05 April 2023 22:05
*To:* TDF Devs ; TDF Marketing <
market...@global.libreoffice.org>; TDF Design <
des...@global.libreoffice.org>
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] Moving
to LibreOffice 8?
Hi Eyal, all!
I also respec
ice suite: LibreOffice Website
>> <https://www.libreoffice.org/> *
>> * Respects your privacy, and gives you back control over your data*
>> ----------
>> *From:* Gustavo Buzzatti Pacheco
>> *Sent:* 05 April 2023 22:05
>> *To:* TDF Devs ;
* Gustavo Buzzatti Pacheco
> *Sent:* 05 April 2023 22:05
> *To:* TDF Devs ; TDF Marketing <
> market...@global.libreoffice.org>; TDF Design <
> des...@global.libreoffice.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] Moving to
> LibreOffice 8?
>
> H
To put last thing first: I'm not staunchly opposed to bumping the
version number to 8. So think of this as a theoretical discussion.
Anyway...
Noting Italo's explanation that:
> 80% (and probably more) of what we communicate is targeted to
"normal" software users, and not to community members
tps://www.libreoffice.org/>
Respects your privacy, and gives you back control over your data
From: Gustavo Buzzatti Pacheco
Sent: 05 April 2023 22:05
To: TDF Devs ; TDF Marketing
; TDF Design
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] Moving to
LibreOffice
you might reason that since humans behave like herd animals, so that
when some run, all run. The stimulus evoking action must be the most
convincing, hence
the facts can be distorted.
For Libre office number eight it might suffice to claim the usual "the
changes will assure your improved
On 06/04/23 10:08, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
That is exactly what I'm opposing. Let's assume that the real situation
is "boring" (I'm not sure that's the case, but still) and that, indeed,
the changes since 7 are not fundamental enough to merit a version bump
on their own (and I realize this is
Gustavo, it seems that what you're saying is that the _reality_ is a bit
"boring" - a long sequence of minor releases without a
fundamental/breakthrough change; and there is a desire to make it more
interesting/exciting using a major version bump.
That is exactly what I'm opposing. Let's
from my IBM Selectric Typewriter
-Original Message-
From: Gustavo Buzzatti Pacheco
To: TDF Devs ; TDF Marketing
; TDF Design
Sent: Wed, Apr 5, 2023 5:05 pm
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] Moving
Hi Eyal, all!
I also respectfully disagree with you on some points. ;D
I like the idea to move to 8, even with no big technical innovation (if we
have, for sure it will be better).
IMHO, long sequences of minor releases (7.6, in the current case) are
getting boring and not important for the
Gentlemen & Gentlewomen...
It's easy to assume a passive role, sit, watch and criticize...
All LibreOffice contributors have been doing more than an extraordinary
job. Lets not cloud our minds with trivial issues. Let's continue moving
forward.
All the best to all...
--
Jorge E. Restrepo
On
I totally understand Italo's frustration. I also hate when I am expected to make a decision and people, who were absolutely silent and
indifferent before, suddenly start to verbalise their opinion, which "happens to be" different from mine.
Regarding the version number, I think people who liked
I have been asked to provide my opinion by developers, who seem to think that
the change of version has to be a marketing decision. As I have said quite
clearly, I am pissed off by the current situation, where I am asked to take a
decision and then I am blamed because I take one. I leave the
Sirs (& ladies?),
As an ironical kick in the soft underbelly of commercial progams one
might emphasise that there also are trivial changes warranting a
numerical advance.
ExampleS: say that Libre office text now starts with Capitalis
Quadrata(in the shape of Times new roman) rather than
I respectfully disagree with Italo.
First, about the "frame of reference". In my opinion, decisions such as
major version number bumping are not, first and foremost, marketing
decisions. That is a _consideration_, since the version number is
declarative than technical. But - such an action
20 matches
Mail list logo
