Hi Mike,
On 29.12.2019 13:38, Kaganski Mike wrote:
Given that there was no further discussion on this topic (AFAICT), do
you have plans to go on and integrate in in the near future please?
I'll put this on my TODO list. But let's do it on the master branch
only, not to the 6.4 branch just
Hi Kohei,
On 2019-12-14 1:38, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Alright, since now one person is raising objection on hastily
> integrating this piece, I should hold on to integrating this piece for
> now, and let the discussion continue.
If I understand correctly, there was no objections on integrating
On Friday 13 of December 2019, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On 13.12.2019 05:43, Luboš Luňák wrote:
> Sure, but that's just as much of a speculation as my own interpretation.
> To be fair, it is possible that you are right, and I am wrong. But I
> did provide my own interpretations of those numbers
On 13.12.2019 08:06, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 13.12.2019 03:32, Michael Meeks wrote:
Given the large wins, what would you think of the idea of pushing to
get this released early ? ;-)
Sure, I'm onboard with that. :-) I just need to tie a few loose ends,
but once that's
On 13.12.2019 05:43, Luboš Luňák wrote:
On Friday 13 of December 2019, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I just finished my benchmark testing on mdds::multi_type_vector, and
summarized my results in this blog post:
http://kohei.us/2019/12/12/benchmark-results-on-mdds-multi_type_vector/
Hopefully my
On Friday 13 of December 2019, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I just finished my benchmark testing on mdds::multi_type_vector, and
> summarized my results in this blog post:
>
> http://kohei.us/2019/12/12/benchmark-results-on-mdds-multi_type_vector/
>
> Hopefully my findings and intepre
Hi Michael,
On 13.12.2019 03:32, Michael Meeks wrote:
Given the large wins, what would you think of the idea of pushing to
get this released early ? ;-)
Sure, I'm onboard with that. :-) I just need to tie a few loose ends,
but once that's done, I can release a new version with this
Hi Kohei,
On 13/12/2019 03:01, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I just finished my benchmark testing on mdds::multi_type_vector, and
> summarized my results in this blog post:
>
> http://kohei.us/2019/12/12/benchmark-results-on-mdds-multi_type_vector/
Wow - that's wonderful work =)
I just finished my benchmark testing on mdds::multi_type_vector, and
summarized my results in this blog post:
http://kohei.us/2019/12/12/benchmark-results-on-mdds-multi_type_vector/
Hopefully my findings and intepretations make sense. In short, the
numbers look great. The overhead of block
