On 02/22/2013 04:51 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 21:50 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
The issue is purely academic, but if it _has_ to be resolved then yes
a compatibility mode has a much better value that creating an
'alternate' function.
True - though clearly there
I'm sorry, I didn't know about that discussion.
You're right, it's pointless to do the same here, so it's better just to
stop the discussion.
Please accept my apologies
Xisco
2013/2/22 Tor Lillqvist
> > I've seen this was implemented in Apache Openoffice recently. Probably we
> > can just merg
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 21:50 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> The issue is purely academic, but if it _has_ to be resolved then yes
> a compatibility mode has a much better value that creating an
> 'alternate' function.
True - though clearly there is some residual benefit in importing ODF
> I've seen this was implemented in Apache Openoffice recently. Probably we
> can just merge it into Libreoffice.
And you did not notice the flood of useless discussion that ensued on
the AOO list, with one contributor (partially) leaving AOO?
PLEASE STOP THIS DISCUSSION NOW! ;)
--tml
__
Hello,
I've seen this was implemented in Apache Openoffice recently. Probably we
can just merge it into Libreoffice.
Commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=aoo/trunk&id=908088f614cda46d9c996e40579611df27276394
Regards,
Xisco
___
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
wrote:
>
> The alternate suggestion was to add a "compatibility mode".
The issue is purely academic, but if it _has_ to be resolved then yes
a compatibility mode has a much better value that creating an
'alternate' function.
1/ a compatibil
I was recently involved in a conversation related Calc and Excel
compatibility. At issue is the fact that LO returns POWER(0,0) = 1 and
Excel returns an error.
I have seen two primary means of dealing with this suggested. The first
is to create a compatibility function for POWER(x,y) to matc
