Hello
A great and beautiful work has been done, thank you for that.
I hope my poor English will not betray my goal which is trying to improve
this feature. I would like to continue to discuss it constructively...
My message will be a bit long because it is necessary to detail the steps,
sorry
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:29:20AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:35:57AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Nobody interested to test and answer?
I think it is rather that most in QA already have their share of critical bugs
to care about.
Hi Bjoern,
Thank you very much for your kind words.
I think that this story shows that we need more discussion between
developers, QA-team and power users.
Later I will try to make constructive propositions to improve our
collaboration, for the moment I am building the master to test the
patches
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:29:20AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:35:57AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Nobody interested to test and answer?
I think it is rather that most in QA already have their share of critical bugs
to care about.
Hi Bjoern,
Thank you very much for your kind words.
I think that this story shows that we need more discussion between
developers, QA-team and power users.
Later I will try to make constructive propositions to improve our
collaboration, for the moment I am building the master to test the
patches
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:29:20AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:35:57AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Nobody interested to test and answer?
I think it is rather that most in QA already have their share of critical bugs
to care about.
Hi Bjoern,
Thank you very much for your kind words.
I think that this story shows that we need more discussion between
developers, QA-team and power users.
Later I will try to make constructive propositions to improve our
collaboration, for the moment I am building the master to test the
patches
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:35:57AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Nobody interested to test and answer?
I think it is rather that most in QA already have their share of critical bugs
to care about.
Well, it is clear that QA peoples are not welcome in this area of the
Hi there,
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 06:35 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Nobody interested to test and answer?
Sigh - people are busy; in particular Markus - whose baby this is has
just put in a great chunk of bug-fixing work for 3.6.2 / 3.6.3 to
improve lots of conditional formatting
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
If nothing is possible, I think the better thing to do is to remove the
button Edit from the Manage dialog.
I think this is the best thing to do in this case - there is even a
bug because of this edit button. If
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:35:57AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Nobody interested to test and answer?
I think it is rather that most in QA already have their share of critical bugs
to care about.
Well, it is clear that QA peoples are not welcome in this area of the
Hi there,
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 06:35 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Nobody interested to test and answer?
Sigh - people are busy; in particular Markus - whose baby this is has
just put in a great chunk of bug-fixing work for 3.6.2 / 3.6.3 to
improve lots of conditional formatting
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org wrote:
If nothing is possible, I think the better thing to do is to remove the
button Edit from the Manage dialog.
I think this is the best thing to do in this case - there is even a
bug because of this edit button. If
Hi all,
Now, the bottleneck fdo#54498 has been fixed for LO 3.6.2, it is a great
step toward making LO 3.6 usable for production !
So I think it's time for developers to consider the severe UX issue we
have with the Edit dialog from manage screen in Format - Conditional
Formatting - Manage.
The
Hi,
Nobody interested to test and answer?
Well, it is clear that QA peoples are not welcome in this area of the
code. :-(
JBF
Le 25/09/2012 06:58, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
Hi all,
Now, the bottleneck fdo#54498 has been fixed for LO 3.6.2, it is a great
step toward making LO 3.6 usable
Hi all,
Now, the bottleneck fdo#54498 has been fixed for LO 3.6.2, it is a great
step toward making LO 3.6 usable for production !
So I think it's time for developers to consider the severe UX issue we
have with the Edit dialog from manage screen in Format - Conditional
Formatting - Manage.
The
Hi all,
Now, the bottleneck fdo#54498 has been fixed for LO 3.6.2, it is a great
step toward making LO 3.6 usable for production !
So I think it's time for developers to consider the severe UX issue we
have with the Edit dialog from manage screen in Format - Conditional
Formatting - Manage.
The
17 matches
Mail list logo
