On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:57:10AM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
What exactly do you mean with review here? I don't think we should spend
too much time on that during the ESC call, but I'd be ok with some does
anyone see a bug on this list that shouldn't belong there topic.
Yes, the latter is
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:57:10AM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
What exactly do you mean with review here? I don't think we should spend
too much time on that during the ESC call, but I'd be ok with some does
anyone see a bug on this list that shouldn't belong there topic.
Yes, the latter is
Hi Bjoern,
On Monday, 2015-06-29 11:28:02 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
- create a query that show all priority: highest bugs that have been touched
in the last 25 hours (daily), 8 days (weekly)[1]
- have a bot send these summaries daily or weekly to the dev-list
- drop the MABs are
Hi Bjoern,
On Monday, 2015-06-29 11:28:02 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
- create a query that show all priority: highest bugs that have been touched
in the last 25 hours (daily), 8 days (weekly)[1]
- have a bot send these summaries daily or weekly to the dev-list
- drop the MABs are
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
This is for the ESC to both be aware of newly marked important bugs -- and
also
to weed out one or another wrongly marked high priority bug. Also, this should
help us keep the total number of high priority bugs both under
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This
Hi,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
I'd like to suggest to add this query as a reocurring item for the Robinson and
the rest of
Hi,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
I'd like to suggest to add this query as a reocurring item for the Robinson and
the rest of
On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
I'd like to suggest to add this query as
On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
I'd like to suggest to add this query as
On Sun, 31 May 2015 22:14:54 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All!
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
I will miss MABs... expecially the fact there were different
Hi All!
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
What this mean:
1) If you notice that you lack privileges then just email me and I'll
add you to the list (add your bugzilla email account)[1][2]
2)
Hi All!
So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking
out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*.
What this mean:
1) If you notice that you lack privileges then just email me and I'll
add you to the list (add your bugzilla email account)[1][2]
2)
Hi,
Maybe after update the flowchart, the link could go beside Importance
selection.
So an easy access is given for everybody.
Miguel Ángel.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/MAB-Priority-and-Severity-tp4150125p4150135.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
