On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 16:25 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> In the 3.5 biblio.odb, they are only hidden from view. Right click on
> any column header (title), choose "show columns" then "all". If we
> want this to be the default, save that odb and commit it to git.
Doh, done, thanks.
C.
_
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:22:38PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 06:56 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:15:10PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>>> a) oddly base doesn't show the same fields that the bibliography
>>>widget does, possibly a bug
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 06:56 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:15:10PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > a) oddly base doesn't show the same fields that the bibliography
> >widget does, possibly a bug worth fixing ?
>
> Cannot immediately reproduce. Which field is vi
> > b) oddly base doesn't seem to "PACK" the dbase III files after
> >editing, so deleted records still take up space in the file,
> >possibly a bug worth fixing ?
>
> Do you have an idea of how to "PACK" a dbase III file? Is is already
> implemented in our code and we just need to add the
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:15:10PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Aha, now I understand the problem. Looking a bit closer, our biblio.odb
> *doesn't* embed the database inside the .odb, this is one of the .odbs
> which point to an external data source/sink. In this case it points to
> ~/.libreoff
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 11:24 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> On 3/8/12 9:44 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> > Yeah it seems to still consist of OOo and StarOffice entries. Italio
> > could you have another go at this. i.e. attaching a biblio.odb which has
> > LibreOffice entries in it. I'd like to get
On 3/8/12 9:44 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Yeah it seems to still consist of OOo and StarOffice entries. Italio
> could you have another go at this. i.e. attaching a biblio.odb which has
> LibreOffice entries in it. I'd like to get this low-hanging fruit out of
> the way.
I have the proper docum
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 22:15 +0100, Rob Snelders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you sure this is the correct file? When I open the file I only see
> OpenOffice and StarOffice entries. Maybe someone else can check what
> he/she sees.
Yeah it seems to still consist of OOo and StarOffice entries. Italio
coul
Hi Italo,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:27:26PM +0100, Italo Vignoli
wrote:
> I have patched the biblio.odb document with LibreOffice entries (got rid
> of the old OOo entries). The patch is below to be checked, but I do not
> understand if I have to attach the patched document as well. Please
> he
Hi,
Are you sure this is the correct file? When I open the file I only see
OpenOffice and StarOffice entries. Maybe someone else can check what
he/she sees.
Greetings,
Rob Snelders
On 13-02-12 22:06, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 2/13/12 9:44 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
If you can attach the file
On 2/13/12 9:44 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> If you can attach the file, that would be most helpful. I am unable to
> reasonably extract the patch from the message - sorry for that, but the
> way that works for me flawlessly for text-only patches failed on this
> binary one :-(
No problem. You kn
Hi Italo,
Italo Vignoli píše v Po 13. 02. 2012 v 12:27 +0100:
> I have patched the biblio.odb document with LibreOffice entries (got rid
> of the old OOo entries). The patch is below to be checked, but I do not
> understand if I have to attach the patched document as well. Please
> help.
If you
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:27:26 +0100, Italo Vignoli
wrote:
I have patched the biblio.odb document with LibreOffice entries (got rid
of the old OOo entries). The patch is below to be checked, but I do not
understand if I have to attach the patched document as well. Please
help. Thanks, Italo
I have patched the biblio.odb document with LibreOffice entries (got rid
of the old OOo entries). The patch is below to be checked, but I do not
understand if I have to attach the patched document as well. Please
help. Thanks, Italo
---
extras/source/database/biblio.odb | Bin 2796 -> 2723 bytes
14 matches
Mail list logo
