Re: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

057> and <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/146063> "Remove support for AIX": As discussed in the mailing list thread starting at <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-January/089808.html> "Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge impleme

Re: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

Hi Stephan! On 1/24/23 14:33, Stephan Bergmann wrote: diff --git a/bridges/Library_cpp_uno.mk b/bridges/Library_cpp_uno.mk index 5dc92c23cdbb..44130ad69732 100644 --- a/bridges/Library_cpp_uno.mk +++ b/bridges/Library_cpp_uno.mk @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ bridge_exception_objects := except else ifeq

Re: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

On 24/01/2023 14:08, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On Jan 24, 2023, at 1:43 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: * "Remove Solaris 32-bit SPARC and x86 C++ UNO bridge implementations": Those were the only bridge implementations for Solaris, but the

Re: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

mplementation for AIX, which implies that support for the AIX platform as a >> whole is dead and should thus be removed. > > * <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/146058> "Remove support for 32-bit > S390": > >> As discussed in the mailing list threa

Re: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

;: As discussed in the mailing list thread starting at <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-January/089808.html> "Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)", the bridge implementation at bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_aix

Re: [External] : Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

p.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-January/089808.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!KXU_z2MpxVAcDc3mFSv6lVajUOw57x8kXdOz-kYNh_H6qrbrbJ_-oDGDaMyqhLSViKqpztTIkBHLPjYe5On88XvjV14vXA$ > "Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)"). I don't know if there are any other S

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

tps://www.openindiana.org/2022/12/04/openindiana-hipster-2022-10-is-here/>) in CC, maybe he can shed some light on this. (Andreas, my full original email starting this thread is at <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-January/089808.html> "Plan to remove dead

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

enindiana-hipster-2022-10-is-here/>) in CC, maybe he can shed some light on this. (Andreas, my full original email starting this thread is at <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-January/089808.html> "Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (brid

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

Hi Stephan! On 1/11/23 08:21, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 10/01/2023 19:57, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: (5) Presumably dead: * gcc3_linux_alpha => https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice=alpha Thanks for those pointers. Just to make sure, the latest line there being

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

On 10/01/2023 19:57, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: (5) Presumably dead: * gcc3_linux_alpha => https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice=alpha Thanks for those pointers. Just to make sure, the latest line there being 1:6.4.5-1 (sid) Buildd exposure stats alpha

Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))

Hi Stephan! There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO bridge implementations at bridges/source/cpp_uno/, some of which are presumably dead by now. And my recent "Rudimentary support for dynamic_cast

Re: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

Hi, Am 10.01.23 um 17:31 schrieb Stephan Bergmann: Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I know are built for Fedora releases; they go into category 2. Also in Debian Next, there are 2 additional implementations that I presume are built for Debian releases (Rene, correct me if

Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)

There are currently 27 different, per-platform C++ UNO bridge implementations at bridges/source/cpp_uno/, some of which are presumably dead by now. And my recent "Rudimentary support for dynamic_cast on UNO